• Karl Auerbach
  • Send Message | Company | Website | Blog
  • Member Since: Jun 14, 2003
  • Featured Posts: 29
  • Comments: 82

About: Karl Auerbach, is a former member of the Board of Directors of Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). He was the elected “at-large” representative for Bermuda, Canada, Greenland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, and the United States to the Board of Directors of ICANN. Mr. Auerbach is also the founder of a new company developing tools to detect and repair network problems and assisting protocol Implementers. He was formerly a senior researcher in the Advanced Internet Architecture group in the Office of the Chief Strategy Officer at Cisco Systems. In addition to his technical work, Mr. Auerbach has been an attorney in California since 1978, a member of the Intellectual Property Section of he California State Bar, and was named Yuen Fellow of Law and Technology at the California Institute of Technology and Loyola of Los Angeles Law School.

Displaying recent 5 of 29 posts | View All Featured Posts — by Karl Auerbach 

DNS, Domain Names, Domain Registries, Security, Top-Level Domains / blogs / Jul 09, 2007 8:51 PM PST

Google Buys VeriSign (not really)

No that's not really happening, Google is not buying VeriSign. But given Google's ravenous appetite for data, it might find VeriSign quite attractive. VeriSign has both root domain name servers and servers for the .com and .net top level domains (TLDs). VeriSign could data mine the queries coming into those servers and produce an very valuable real-time stream of what users on the net are doing... Google just bought Postini -- and one would have to be fairly naive to believe that Google does not intend to dredge through all... ›››

By Karl Auerbach | Comments: 4 | Views: 3666

DNS, Domain Names, Domain Registries, Top-Level Domains / blogs / Apr 03, 2007 8:41 AM PST

Putting Some Circuit Breakers Into DNS to Protect The Net

There are a lot of bad, but smart, people out there on the net. They are quick to find and capitalize on vulnerabilities, particularly those vulnerabilities in mass market software. These bad folks are quite creative when it comes to making it hard to locate and shutdown the computers involved. For example, a virus that takes over a victim's computer might communicate with its control point, or send its captured/stolen information, by looking up a domain name. Normally domain names are somewhat static - the addresses they map to don't change very frequently - typically changes occur over periods measured in months or longer. ›››

By Karl Auerbach | Comments: 6 | Views: 5492

Internet Protocol, IPv6, Security, VoIP / blogs / Mar 09, 2007 12:47 PM PST

Are We Slowly Losing Control of the Internet?

I have long been intrigued by the question of how do we turn the internet into a lifeline grade infrastructure... My hope that this will occur soon or even within decades is diminishing. Most of us observe, almost daily, how even well established infrastructures tend to crumble when stressed, even slightly... I was at the O'Reilly Etel conference last week. The content was impressive and the people there were frequently the primary actors in the creation and deployment of VOIP. However, not once during the three days did I hear a serious discussion by a speaker or in the hallways about how this evolving system would be managed, monitored, diagnosed, or repaired. ›››

By Karl Auerbach | Comments: 2 | Views: 3546

DNS, Domain Names, Domain Registries, IP Addressing, Top-Level Domains / blogs / Jan 08, 2007 9:54 AM PST

Internet Zombies

Today on Dave Farber's IP list, someone revived the ancient argument that ICANN imposes limits on the number of top level domains (TLDs) because to have more than a few will cause DNS to wobble and cause the internet to collapse. Although long discredited, that argument hangs around like a zombie. ICANN has never been able to adduce a shred of proof that there is anything to support that assertion... ›››

By Karl Auerbach | Comments: 3 | Views: 4074

Internet Protocol, Net Neutrality, VoIP / blogs / Feb 10, 2006 12:04 PM PST

Questioning “Net Neutrality”

I'm kinda foxed by the some of the discussion going on about "Net Neutrality". The internet was designed from the outset not to be content neutral. Even before there was an IP protocol there were precedence flags in the NCP packet headers. And the IP (the Internet Protocol) has always had 8 bits that are there for the sole purpose of marking the precedence and type-of-service of each packet. It has been well known since the 1970's that certain classes of traffic -- particularly voice (and yes, there was voice on the internet even during the 1970's) -- need special handling... ›››

By Karl Auerbach | Comments: 3 | Views: 4639
More...