Home / Blogs

2020's New Internet Success

CircleID has taken the rare exception to publish this essay anonymously at the request of the author. The reason for anonymity is not to avoid personal or professional harm, says the author, but to drive a point regarding the critical subject matter discussed.


Chinese technology policy is now more effective even than their naval posture in the South China Sea, and both are playing out in full sunshine. This success is not about the hardware pillar of Chinese tech policy, though: its focus is the structural approach China and, increasingly, other stakeholders are taking to global Internet Governance.

Place and Timing

Late in the Year of the Pig just gone, China's offer of a New Internet Protocol was chewed over in senior-level advisory groups of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) after which the formal consensus-building process of that UN organization considered the matter in March and again in July of this year. There were a few briefings and workshops to explain the merits of the system in between times, particularly in Africa, where the ground for novelty and inclusion is fertile. From these briefings, it is clear that a timeframe for rolling out an alternative internet protocol is still notional, but that proponents are aiming at 2024. In the meantime, Huawei, at least, is attracting significant interest around the opportunity by announcing that certain features of New IP will be embedded in their networks within the next 10 years, offering all stakeholders time to evaluate and appreciate the new approach.1

Many Benefits

The "top-down" New IP system will provide a universally-accessible alternative to the current TCP/IP model that has dominated until now. New IP is proving attractive to governments particularly because it assigns each user of the Internet a unique token for naming and addressing that marks all their activity in cyberspace: an obvious but effective way to limit excessive user privacy and eliminate the wet anonymity that has been characteristic of modern creatives from the authors of the Federalist Papers to JK Rowling. New IP will enable central national authorities to manage the authentication process directly, so that under-resourced governments will now be able totally to deliver on the promise of meting out security among their citizens and anyone they interact with online. In this way, freedom of expression is preserved while creating accountability for that expression to any government that believes it should be punished. As importantly, under this approach e-commerce can also be more effectively surveilled, and web-based innovations or content that build on the work of others can be tracked to their sources and addressed in the way the government of that creator's country deems the most expedient, or effective, or quickest. And finally, there will be a rebalancing of charges within eCommerce as well. With embedded "kill-switch" functionalities the New IP will become a practical tool to enforce new protective tariffs on digital services and for extracting appropriate revenue from multinationals, in time to help answer the call of many governments that are already trying hard to ensure the WTO Moratorium on Electronic Transmission does not get extended.

Growing Consensus

The robust proposals of New IP have currency from more than just the Central Kingdom; in Europe, they enjoy support from Telecom Italia and in Africa by at least eleven governments: Burundi, Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, South Sudan, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe. There is every reason to expect — there's no case being made to the contrary, so consensus can only build — that other European entities and governments, those that enjoy strong partnerships with proponents of New IP, will join their voices to this initiative. The United States, which can be sceptical about Chinese initiatives, is today not engaged here, and it is possible to read from this that the U.S. stakeholders are unconcerned, agree, or just take less interest in Internet Governance.

Root Success

In parallel, Huawei is successfully using its diplomatic and commercial influence to generate further governmental support for the initiative. They have helpfully offered trials of the New IP-enabled applications that are filling actual gaps in many countries: those connected to agriculture, remote education, and artificial intelligence. It is unlikely that such large trials will see a reversion back to use of the old root zone, and so many important industries in the developing world should now become zealous champions of New IP, not just for themselves but in a way that gives them a stake in universalizing the use of the new protocols worldwide.

Give it Time

Over the long run, beneficiaries of the Internet economy may become interested in the possibility of increased compliance costs associated with operating with more than one network. But there'll be time enough to consider the validity of such concerns since any costs will become clear once there are two systems in full operation worldwide. Here too, quiet observation and cautious but patient restraint by those most affected will provide the space necessary for China to demonstrate the benefits of competition in matters of Internet protocols and to allow them to flourish — a thousand such may yet bloom — out in the bright sunshine.

Anonymous, TCP/IP.

  1. https://support.huawei.com/enterprise/en/doc/EDOC1000173015/d782a631/segment-routing-mpls 

By CircleID Reporter – CircleID's internal staff reporting on news tips and developing stories. Do you have information the professional Internet community should be aware of? Contact us. Visit Page

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Comments

Your concern is reasonable... By Karl Auerbach  –  Jul 28, 2020 6:05 pm PDT

I, also, have been watching these new proposals, but not in depth.  Your note suggests that I (and others) learn more.

Before I forget, I do want to remind myself, and others, that displacing the well established IPv4 world will be hard.  ISO/OSI tried.  IPv6 is trying (but after 25+ years it still is far from overcoming IPv4.)

And I want to mention that much of our modern life - the width of railroad cars, automobiles, and even to a degree, aircraft, owes its ancestry to the width of the Roman horse pulling a wagon.  Past infrastructures don't vanish; they exert strong constraints on the present and future.

We also need to remember that "valid identity" is hard on today's internet without recourse to a mutually trusted third party intermediary.  That lack, and the understandable resistance to what would, in effect be "a lord of identities" (as well as a "kill switch"), has been source of trouble and dispute for years in things ranging from certificate authorities to domain name registrations.

China is smart.  They have been pushing infrastructure via their Silk Road project, 5G, transport in S. America to allow them to buy agricultural products at prices the US can't match.

Some regions would resist the kind of control that these new proposals envision.  This could, in turn, trigger the kind of "island and bridge" internet of internets that I envisioned in my 2016 article Internet: Quo Vadis (Where are you going?)

The internet is rapidly evolving - it is not really a *computer* network any more; it is a network of applications.  Those, particularly, autonomous pieces of apps, may have a hard time fitting into a top-down framework of identities (or they may not be able to afford the cost of participating in such a system.) And present day uses of the net are putting pressure on some of its weaker aspects, particularly broadcast/multicast notions of group addressing.  I have not seen any answers to that in the New IP stuff.

Is this for real? By Alban Kwan  –  Aug 02, 2020 8:59 pm PDT

I find this article very interesting, but not sure how much of it is real, at least for the moment.  I recall this New IP issue were reported in the media a couple of months ago, which triggered a discussion within the Internet industry WeChat group I was in.  The group was quite surprised to understand why there were all the fuse.  The conclusion expressed at the time was that the New IP is merely a vision expressed in the ITU's Internet 2030 initiatives, which also talks about Holographic Avatars, Instantaneous Teleportation System, and others.  While I don't have any insights beyond what's discussed at the time, this article seems to suggest that the New IP is actually developed and has been embedded in current gen Huawei network equipment.  I found this quite amusing, and very different from what I have heard.

Do you have any reference?

Add Your Comments

 To post your comments, please login or create an account.

Related

Topics

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Whois

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Cybercrime

Sponsored byThreat Intelligence Platform

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias

IP Addressing

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppdetex

New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign