Home / Blogs

Towards a More Fully Accountable and Transparent ICANN

Paul Diaz

ICANN held its second international meeting of 2012 last week in Prague, Czech Republic. While the agenda focused heavily on issues related to new gTLDs and on welcoming incoming CEO Fadi Chehade, ICANN also conducted a community consultation on its accountability and transparency reviews. That session's transcript and presentations are available here.

For the past 18 months, ICANN has been working towards implementing the recommendations of the Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT). This select group of 15 industry, community and government representatives was charged, under the September 2009 Affirmation of Commitments between ICANN and the U.S. government, with assessing ICANN's commitment "to maintain and improve robust mechanisms for public input, accountability, and transparency." In late December 2010, the ATRT published, and the ICANN Board of Directors shortly thereafter accepted, 27 recommendations related to the governance and performance of the Board; the role and effectiveness of the Governmental Advisory Committee; public input and policy processes; and review mechanisms for Board decisions.

While a lot of work has been done, and the ICANN Board and staff are to be commended, it's clear that implementation of the ATRT recommendations remains a work-in-progress. In fact, ICANN staff report that only about half of the recommendations have been implemented to date. Further, on issues like use of reply comment periods and ensuring that public inputs are fully considered in decision-making, community feedback suggests that additional effort is warranted. Perhaps more importantly, unresolved key issues continue to complicate ICANN processes and negatively impact both the community and the corporation. In particular, the vital issue of clarifying the distinction between policy work that requires public input versus "executive function" issues that ICANN staff can independently develop and execute (Recommendation #6) remains unsettled.

It appears unlikely that ICANN will finish implementing all of the remaining recommendations before the end of 2012. This deadline is important because the Affirmation of Commitments requires a follow-on ATRT to assess how fully ICANN has made the original recommendations an integral part of its corporate culture. Such an assessment would be nonsensical, however, if many of the recommendations weren't even applied. While the repercussions of failing to meet the timeline are unclear, it should be obvious that missing yet another deadline will not help ICANN burnish an already bruised image.

We all welcomed Mr. Chehade's Prague pledge to be "extra transparent" as he underscored the importance of decision-making in the public interest. In fact, it looks like he intends to set the bar very high. Truly, the qualitative aspects of the recommendations are as important as implementing them in a timely manner. ICANN's current leadership team should take these commitments to heart — now. At the least, they should be more transparent about who is ultimately accountable for the implementation of the full set of ATRT recommendations — and ensure that such "ownership" produces timely results.

By Paul Diaz, Vice President of Policy, Public Interest Registry
Follow CircleID on
Related topics: ICANN, Internet Governance
SHARE THIS POST

If you are pressed for time ...

... this is for you. More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Vinton Cerf, Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Share your comments

Where does the buck stop? Michael Roberts  –  Jul 02, 2012 8:27 PM PDT

It's simply amazing that at this late date, someone would ask the question of where accountability for ICANN actions rests.

Organizations have Boards with Chairmen, and management teams with Chief Executive Officers. ICANN has a new and very experienced CEO who knows exactly where the buck stops - with him.

Bucks stop with the Board of Directors not the President Karl Auerbach  –  Jul 03, 2012 11:20 AM PDT

The President of ICANN is not where the buck stops.

Rather, it is the Board of Directors which has the ultimate responsibility for, and is ultimately accountable for, everything that ICANN does.

By-the-way, the proper job title for Fadi Chehade's role is "President".  That is the word used in ICANN's bylaws.  Under ICANN's bylaws term "CEO" describes merely one function that is to be performed by ICANN's "President".

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related

Topics

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias

Cybercrime

Sponsored byThreat Intelligence Platform

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

IP Addressing

Sponsored byAvenue4 LLC

New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias

Whois

Sponsored byWhoisXML API