Home / Blogs

Testing IDNs

Susan Crawford

Internationalized (non-ascii) domain names (IDN) are a key issue for ICANN. Yesterday, the Board completed two days of workshop presentations about various matters (IANA, security, GAC relationships), and we were briefed on the IDN testing that is planned.

I thought it might be useful to make clear the distinction between the tests (which are testing mechanisms for IDNs) and the very difficult policy questions that confront ICANN. As several people explained to me yesterday, they're different.

The test (announced here) will be looking at two approaches: DNAME and NS-records. DNAME essentially (as I understand it) makes an alias designation for an entire domain possible. So, if you were testing the top level domain .test (an imaginary domain) with DNAME, you'd be mapping all of .test into an IDN equivalent of .test. From the end-user's perspective, whether you typed in susancrawford.test or [non-ascii script susancrawford].[IDN equivalent of .test], you'd go to the same place.

DNAME would make it possible for an existing TLD operator (for a real domain, not .test) to control registrations in other scripts.

The other approach, NS-records, permits the insertion of an IDN (encoded) into the root. So this means that a new non-ascii TLD using NS-records could be proposed. The test of NS-records would involve, e.g., seeing if different script versions of .test work when they are inserted into the root.

These are two mechanisms. The policy decisions—whether existing gTLDs or ccTLDs should control their script "equivalents" (and how to decide what an "equivalent" is) haven't been made, and won't be until the results of this test are known and can be evaluated.

And even once the tests are over, it doesn't seem as if a single uniform global decision (either DNAME or NS-records) will necessarily result. These two methods aren't mutually exclusive.

These are very difficult policy questions, but the test seems to me to be just that—a test of two mechanisms.

By Susan Crawford, Professor, University of Michigan Law School. Visit the blog maintained by Susan Crawford here.

Related topics: DNS, Domain Names, Domain Registries, ICANN, Multilinguism, Security, Top-Level Domains

Get a weekly summary of postings to CircleID:

 Master Feed (more feeds)      Twitter      Mobile
Bookmark / Email This Post

Comments

Re: Testing IDNs Ram Mohan  –  Apr 10, 2006 12:53 AM PDT

The policy and politics of IDNs far outweigh the scope of the technical tests.

One wrong notion being propagated in the community is that DNAMEs will continue the legacy of existing operators, while NS will allow new players in.  Therefore, some say, DNAME should be (or not be, depending on your point of view) used.

The technical tests will help establish what is feasible operationally; but they will not determine which paths to follow in multi-lingualizing the DNS.

-Ram

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Domain Registrars & Registries: Don't Say You Weren't Warned

EoWhy?

Perspectives on a DNS-CERT

"Thin Brand Line" Breaks as Canon Announces Plans for .CANON

EI, EI - NO!

Related News

Other Topics

Access Providers Broadband Censorship Cloud Computing Cyberattack Cybercrime Cybersquatting Data Center DNS DNSSEC Domain Names Domain Registries Email Enum ICANN Internet Governance Internet Protocol IP Addressing IPTV IPv6 Law Malware Mobile Multilinguism Net Neutrality P2P Policy & Regulation Privacy Regional Registries Security Spam Telecom Top-Level Domains VoIP Web White Space Whois Wireless

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

.ORG, The Public Interest Registry Celebrates Its 25th Year With 8 Million Registrations

MarkMonitor Year in Review Report: How Escalating Online Brand Abuse is Used to Monetize Web Traffic

.ORG: Introducing Fully Internationalized Domain Names

.ORG to Fully Deploy DNSSEC in June

The GLOBE Program Chooses Dyn Inc.'s Dynect Platform to Deploy DNSSEC per Federal OMB Mandate

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Nairobi

.ORG Registrations in 2009 Grew 8.4 Percent Over Previous Year

MarkMonitor Sets New Standard in Brand Protection with Site Staydown Service

Announcement: dotMobi Ownership

Afilias Limited Acquires .Mobi Domain Registry, Expands Market Leadership

ICANN and Cybersecurity: Hot Topics at The First Ever .ORG Forum

Using .ORG Directory to Find Haiti Relief Organizations

Neustar Releases UltraDNS Report Center

Afilias Releases .INFO Domain 2009 Annual Report

Expressions of Interest a Requirement for New gTLDs?

Neustar Implements DNS Security Extensions in the .US Registry

Neustar Launches Initiative to Enhance DNS With Faster, More Secure Updates

Registry Stakeholder Group Comments on Latest ICANN Policies

Open Phishing Season

dotMobi Is Now a Member of The LACTLD