Home / Blogs

Internet Wars

A couple of days ago the BBC reported that a document called the Information Operations Roadmap (PDF) had been declassified and that it contained some pretty interesting stuff.

The American dominance over the Internet, recently manifested by its unwillingness to hand over some of the critical control to UN-organizations, may have another side to it. Usually, the American model of openness is said to be the main reason for the American reluctance. But, reading the Roadmap, it is not very difficult to find some less appealing ulterior motives.

The document blatantly speaks about the Internet as an enemy weapons system, and that US forces should try to gain and maintain control over the entire electro-magnetic spectrum and that the US must be able to "disrupt or destroy the full spectrum of globally emerging communications systems, sensors, and weapons systems dependent on the electromagnetic spectrum"

This is most definitely the military response of what, a decade ago, as called netwars - a concept, and particular type of information warfare, that the RAND Corporation published a report about, called Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy (PDF available).

Also, another RAND report published in collaboration with the National Defense Research Institute U. S. and the Office of the Secretary of Defense, in 1999 was entitled The Emergence of Noopolitik: Toward an American Information Strategy (PDF available). It analyses the soft power potential of the Internet and how it should be used to "get everybody in the world hooked on the dreams made in Hollywood".

The growth of Noopolitik, they say, is a paradigmatic shift:

While realpolitik tends to empower states, noopolitik will likely empower networks of state and nonstate actors. Realpolitik pits one state against another, but noopolitik encourages states to cooperate in coalitions and other mutual frameworks.

Written by Jonathan Lundqvist. Visit the blog maintained by Jonathan Lundqvist here.

Related topics: Internet Governance, Security

Get a weekly summary of postings to CircleID:

 Master Feed (more feeds)      Twitter      Mobile
Bookmark / Email This Post

Comments

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

What are TLDs Good For?

Who Needs More TLDs?

Green Dam is Breached… Now What?

Sharing ICANN Can Be Win-Win for the United States

More Questions About WSJ Claims of Iran DPI

Related News

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Latest Brandjacking Index Examines How Fraudsters Abuse Financial Brands

MarkMonitor at 2009 Trademark, Anti-Counterfeiting and Grey Market Fraud Mitigation Summit

NeuStar Addresses DNS Vulnerability with Cache Defender, a Secure DNS Authentication System

A Seemingly Overwhelming Number of Important Documents Released by ICANN

.ORG First Open Top-Level Domain to be Signed with DNSSEC

DNSSEC Industry Coalition Symposium is Announced

SPIL GAMES Chooses MarkMonitor for Global Domain Management

Facebook Selects MarkMonitor Antifraud Solutions to Combat Malware

Flawed Economic Analysis of New gTLDs

MarkMonitor AntiFraud Solutions, Combining Proven Antiphishing and Expert Antimalware Capabilities

DNSstuff.com Offers Trusteer Rapport Product to Help Users Boost Their Defenses Against Online Fraud

MarkMonitor AntiFraud Solutions Combine Proven Antiphishing and Expert Antimalware Capabalities

DNSSEC Industry Coalition Meets with Vint Cerf and Dan Kaminsky

COCC Partners with MarkMonitor for Anti-Phishing Services

ICANN Mexico City Meeting Brings a Significant Shift in Direction for Brand Rights Holder Issues

MarkMonitor Year-in-Review Report Finds Online Abuse of Major Brands Was a Growth Industry for Fraud

DNSSEC FUD Buster: DNSSEC Slows the Internet?

A United Front to Stop Cybercrime

Committed to Keeping the Internet a Safe Place

NeuStar's UltraDNS to Power NASDAQ Dubai