Home / Blogs

A Thought About Not-Quite-ASCII Top Level Domains

John Levine

ICANN has opened their new fast track process for "countries and territories that use languages based on scripts other than Latin" to get domain names that identify the country or territory in its own language. It's not clear to me what the policy is supposed to be for countries whose languages use extended Latin with accents and other marks that aren't in the ASCII set.

Any country that uses an extended Latin character set can use extended characters in 2LDs right now, and I can't offhand think of any whose current unaccented two-letter ccTLD isn't an adequate mnemonic for their name. But let's say that Serbia feels that .RS is kind of lame, so they apply for and get .Србија which is perfectly reasonable, since that's the Cyrillic character set.

Then Romania decides that .RO is too generic, so they ask for .România with the circumflex over the â, as it is properly spelled in Romanian. That's an IDN, so how can they say no?

Hey, say the Hungarians, they got their country names, we want .Magyar. Oh, no, that's ASCII, that will be $185,000 and a highly uncertain multi-year process. Really?

By John Levine, Author, Consultant & Speaker. More blog posts from John Levine can also be read here.

Related topics: Domain Names, ICANN, Multilinguism, Top-Level Domains

 
   

Don't miss a thing – get the Weekly Wrap delivered to your inbox.

Comments

Somewhere, In The Aegean Sea... John Berryhill  –  Nov 19, 2009 11:07 AM PDT

Be careful.  ICM Registry may take over an Aegean island, declare independence from Greece, and found the Republic of XXX (Greek chi chi chi - not ascii XXX)

I don't follow all of ICANN's policy Kim Davies  –  Nov 19, 2009 11:23 AM PDT

I don't follow all of ICANN's policy discussions closely so I may be wrong, but I understand that there is work ongoing, including during the Seoul meeting, to ensure that country names (including all translations of them) are prohibited as gTLDs pending the conclusion of the ccNSO's IDN ccTLD policy development process, that will likely classify ".magyar" etc. as ccTLDs.

As for a ".românia", the fast track IDN ccTLD process is limited to non-Latin character sets precisely because the programme's raison d'etre is that it is unreasonably burdensome for users of Chinese, Arabic etc. to use Latin characters in part of their domain name. For users of Latin-based scripts, including those that might use diacritical marks, that argumentation does not apply so are not eligible to apply under fast-track.

Unreasonably burdensome John Levine  –  Nov 19, 2009 11:37 AM PDT

I didn't pick Serbia at random.  Although their preferred character set is Cyrillic, Serbian is nearly identical to Croatian which is written in Roman characters, and everyone in Serbia can read them without difficulty.  (For example, the Serbian edition of my Internet for Dummies is in Roman characters.) Since they're not burdened by using Roman letters, would ICANN turn down their application for a Cyrillic ccTLD?  And if not, how could they turn down the Romanians who are equally unburdened?  I understand the theory, but I cannot see how it could possibly stand up if any country challenged it.

Cutting and pasting from the procedure, here Kim Davies  –  Nov 19, 2009 11:55 AM PDT

Cutting and pasting from the procedure, here is the eligibility for country's to get a fast-track IDN ccTLD string assigned. As with any line in the sand, there could be corner cases where some may judge there should be a different outcome, but this was the definitional compromise that seemed appropriate and well supported during the development of the fast-track process:

"The language must be an official language in the corresponding country or territory, and have legal status in the country or territory, or serve as a language of administration.

The language requirement is considered verified as follows:

1) If the language is listed for the relevant country or territory as an ISO 639 language in Part Three of the Technical Reference Manual for the standardization of Geographical Names, United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (“UNGEGN Manual”); or

2) If the language is listed as an administrative language for the relevant country or territory in the ISO 3166-1 standard under column 9 or 10; or

3) If the relevant public authority in the country or territory confirms that the language is used or served as follows, (either by letter or link to the relevant government constitution or other online documentation from an official government website):
a. used in official communications of the relevant public authority; and
b. serves as a language of administration."

Yes indeed John Levine  –  Nov 19, 2009 2:01 PM PDT

Each of the three languages is the ISO 639 national language for the country in question, so it looks like they're all eligible to me.

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Explore Topics

Dig Deeper

DNS Security

Sponsored by Afilias

IP Addressing

Sponsored by Avenue4 LLC

Cybersecurity

Sponsored by Verisign

Mobile Internet

Sponsored by Afilias Mobile & Web Services

Promoted Posts

Buying or Selling IPv4 Addresses?

Watch this video to discover how ACCELR/8, a transformative trading platform developed by industry veterans Marc Lindsey and Janine Goodman, enables organizations to buy or sell IPv4 blocks as small as /20s. more»

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Radix's .TECH, .STORE, .ONLINE and .FUN Get Approval from the Chinese Government

Join Neustar's Town Hall Meeting and Help Shape the Future Of .US

Domain Registrations Reach 331.9 Million, 6.7 Million Growth Year over Year

.brands Spotlight: Banking and Finance Industries

Google Buys Business.Site Domain for 'Google My Business'

Radix Announces Global Web Design Contest, F3.space

Global Domain Name Registrations Reach 330.6 Million, 1.3 Million Growth in First Quarter of 2017

.TECH Gets Its Big Hollywood Break

Why the Record Number of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking UDRP Filings in 2016?

UDRP: Better Late than Never - ICA Applauds WIPO for Removing Misguided 'Retroactive Bad Faith'

The Rise and Fall of the UDRP Theory of 'Retroactive Bad Faith'

.PRESS Supports Press Freedom Day for 3rd Consecutive Year

5 Afilias Top Level Domains Now Licensed for Sale in China

Radix Announces Largest New gTLD Sale with Casino.Online

2016 Year in Review: The Trending Keywords in .COM and .NET Domain Registrations

Global Domain Name Registrations Reach 329.3 Million, 2.3 Million Growth in Last Quarter of 2016

A Look at How the New .SPACE TLD Has Performed Over the Past 2 Years

Neustar to be Acquired by Private Investment Group Led by Golden Gate Capital

Startup League Reports from WebSummit, Lisbon

.SPACE Becomes the Choice of the First Ever Space Nation Asgardia