Home / Blogs

Soon in a Mail Box Near You: Internationalized Email Addresses

Patrick Vande Walle

The EAI working group of the IETF has finished (part of) its work on the interationalization of email addresses. This, together with Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) will make it possible to send email messages to non-7 bit ASCII addresses e.g. måtte@københavn.dk or 中国@中国.中国 .

There are 3 RFCs, covering changes to the SMTP protocol, e-mail message format and delivery Status Notifications.

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5335.txt
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5336.txt
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5337.txt

They still have the "Experimental" status, meaning they are not yet a standard. How long this will take to see them in actual products is difficult to guess. Software vendors tend to look at market demand before implementing new features . Hence, it is time to pressure your favourite e-mail client vendor. Tell them you need that. For Microsoft Outlook, you could try here. For Apple Mail, there. For Mozilla Thunderbird, still somewhere else.

Written by Patrick Vande Walle, CTO (Chief Travelling Officer) for .sport. Visit the blog maintained by Patrick Vande Walle here.

Related topics: Multilinguism

Get a weekly summary of postings to CircleID:

 Master Feed (more feeds)      Twitter      Mobile
Bookmark / Email This Post

Comments

Experimental status is underwhelming The Famous Brett Watson  –  Sep 08, 2008 7:50 PM PDT

"Experimental" status means that the RFCs aren't even being proposed as a standard—they are not on the standards track. That's not to say that they shouldn't be implemented, but let's not misrepresent their status with the the suggestion that they are on track to becoming standards. This is more like running them up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes.

This is more like running them up Patrick Vande Walle  –  Sep 08, 2008 11:52 PM PDT

This is more like running them up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes.

You are correct these are not standards yet. This is why I suggest to pressure software vendors. When they will realize that most of their markets do not use 7-bit ASCII and that there is a proposed specification, they will have no excuse anymore. It's up to them to start working on the specs and ask for these specifications to be put on the standards track.

While the basic ideas are sound some Kio Boskden  –  Sep 09, 2008 12:59 PM PDT

While the basic ideas are sound some of the details are going to cause problems.

[RFC5335]
> the use of normalization form NFC is RECOMMENDED

I'd really love to know the reason for this brilliant idea. This should be MUST instead of RECOMMENDED. The most obvious problem are hash computations and string indexing - both basic building blocks of most anti-spam systems.

If there are only 4 instances of say ö there are 2^4=16 possible MD5 hashs for the "same" header text…

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Identify Infringing Domains to Optimize Online Search Marketing Spend

Consider Planning Now for Internationalized Top-Level Domains

Public Interest Registry Opens Call for Nominations for Its Advisory Council

Did We Miss ICANN's Reply?

.ORG & NCUC Joint Letter to ICANN on Internationalized Domain Names

All-Star Lineup Headlines DOMAINfest Global Agenda

Second DOMAINfest Global Event Offers Information-Intensive Industry Agenda

Sedo Selected as "Entrepreneur of the Year 2007" in Germany by Ernst & Young

NeuStar Launches Korean Language Domain Names in .BIZ TLD

Public Interest Registry Names Alexa A. S. Raad as New CEO

NeuStar Launches Chinese and Japanese Language Domain Names in .BIZ TLD

Spanish .ORG IDNs Registrations Available March 3rd

Hong Kong Internet Expert Pindar Wong Joins Public Interest Registry Board

ICANN Opens 26th International Meeting in Marrakech, Morocco

PIR Welcomes New Worldwide Internet Leaders to the .ORG Advisory Council

Timetable for Testing IDNS in Top-Level Domains Announced

ICANN Publishes Latest Newsletter

Implementation of Internationalized Top-Level Domains