Home / Blogs

Can Mobile Operators Afford a Mobile-Only Strategy?

With 4G rollouts in many developed mobile markets reaching completion, it might be time to check the balance of the state of the mobile industry.

Looking at campaigns around the world it is clear that what you see are ‘me too’ strategies. The advertising campaigns and the marketing hyperbole around them might suggest that a particular operator has now done something unique or very special, but if one looks beyond the advertising blurb it is clear that the campaign is nothing new and/or that what is on offer can be very easily matched by their competitors in the market.

Voice and SMS revenue has been stagnant and in many situations has declined and is declining further. Certainly, extra revenues have been generated through mobile data, with more devices connected to the network; but in the end this is also a commodity product and increased competition will always make it difficult to increase the prices in this market.

Because of a lack of revenue growth we now see increased cost-cutting, which is leading to increased industry consolidation. This, of course, is aimed at limiting competition and would allow the remaining operators to use their dominant positions in the market to increase prices. As mentioned in last week’s analysis, regulators in both the USA and Europe have already stepped in and either rejected such mergers outright or placed very heavy conditions on such transactions, making it doubtful whether—under those conditions—such mergers would actually benefit the parties involved.

So is it time for mobile-only operators to start looking beyond the mobile market? Several operators—notably Vodafone—have already bought into fixed operators, but this has not yet created a significant shift in the industry. Most still limit their operation to mobile-only. Those operators that do operate in both markets on a larger scale simply keep the business separated in order to avoid cannibalisation. There is little or no activity around interesting innovations covering both networks. At best these operators offer a bit of bundling, which basically is price competition and does not lead to the innovations the market is interested in.

The over-the-top (OTT) players, as they are called, are far more innovative and are moving further and further into this market, adding true value to the basic mobile product. Developments here, of course, also include the utilisation of big data. Mobile operators could also move in this direction, using their services to attract wholesale customers interested in using the mobile networks to build different content-based mobile products around the telecoms elements of the service.

So far we have not seen any spectacular new initiatives from the mobile operators, and this seems to be the general trend in the industry. In the meantime others will build more interesting services around the mobile services and the operators will continue to complain that those operators are having a free-ride and so on.

It would be much better if the operators took the future into their own hands and started looking at their business models to see if they are still on the right track—rather than simply trying to protect their incumbent market they could look outside the box to see what else they can do with their valuable asset.

By Paul Budde, Managing Director of Paul Budde Communication

Paul is also a contributor of the Paul Budde Communication blog located here.

Visit Page

Filed Under

Comments

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Related

Topics

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global