Home / Blogs

Netflix Has Buyer's Remorse Over Its Paid Peering Deal With Comcast

Rob Frieden

Soon after capitulating to Comcast's surcharge demand for improved treatment of its traffic, Netflix got better downstream delivery speeds. Apparently Comcast did not have to undertake a major bandwidth expansion program. Much to the immediate relief of Netflix, Comcast merely needed to allocate more ports for Netflix traffic. So with a reallocation of available bandwidth, Comcast solved Netflix's quality of service dilemma apparently without degrading service to anyone else, upstream or downstream.

Rather than make Netflix satisfied with its surcharge payment, Comcast has triggered buyer's remorse. Netflix CEO Reed Hastings now rails against the deal he cut as payment of a unfair toll; see
Internet Tolls And The Case For Strong Net Neutrality.

Haven't we heard this scrip before? Yes. Level 3 used words like toll bridge and surcharge when Comcast hit that company up for more compensation.

Comcast surely can exploit a bottleneck in the sense that it exclusively controls the "last mile" link to its sizeable share of broadband subscribers. Acquiring Time Warner Cable would increase Comcast's market share, and most consumers don't have a faster, cheaper, or better alternative.

Comcast has won the game of chicken, because Netflix and content providers have to fix the problem of subpar download delivery speeds as soon as they occur, or risk inconveniencing their subscribers. Comcast and retail ISPs have greater leverage, because Netflix has to ensure high quality of service across the entire link to its subscribers. Comcast can deliberately degrade service by refusing to allocate sufficient ports, but Netflix subscribers don't care who has caused the deterioration. Netflix has to "fix the problem" immediately even if Comcast has leveraged inferior delivery to force a return to the status quo in terms of downstream service quality.

Upstream content providers and carriers appear to have declining leverage in forcing retail ISPs to accommodate any and all increases in downstream demand. Arguably Comcast could have hit its subscribers with higher rates, but the company has embarked on a strategy designed to maximize payments from upstream content providers and carriers, but also from downstream retail subscribers. Netflix, Level 3 and Content Delivery Networks get hit with surcharge demands, but at the same time Comcast and other retail ISPs can raise retail rates across the broad, or create more tiers of service resulting in higher rates for large volume subscribers.

Going forward I believe it will be quite a stretch for content providers to wrap themselves around a network neutrality banner when a downstream carrier manipulates the allocation of ports and bandwidth for maximum leverage. This "network management" function does not constitute deliberate blocking of packets. Similarly Comcast will reframe the issue as one of commercial negotiations about access to property rather than discrimination and an unfair trade practice.

By Rob Frieden, Pioneers Chair and Professor of Telecommunications and Law. More blog posts from Rob Frieden can also be read here.

Related topics: Access Providers, Net Neutrality

WEEKLY WRAP — Get CircleID's Weekly Summary Report by Email:

Comments

Conclusion Michael Elling  –  Mar 25, 2014 3:27 PM PDT

So what is the conclusion or point of this article.  Don't we already know what last mile access providers will do?  Haven't they been moving the goalposts inwards and upwards from their layer 1 edge access monopolies for the past 100 years?

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Beyond Neutrality - Enabling a World of Connected Things

Some Observations from NANOG 62

The Velocity of Change at SCTE

Internet Regulation: Section 706 vs Title II

How Big Is That Network?

Related News

Topics

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

DotConnectAfrica Delegates Attend the Kenya Internet Governance Forum

DotConnectAfrica Attends Transform Africa 2013 Summit in Rwanda

Dyn Research: CDN Adoption Across Our Customer Base

Neustar Expands Professional Services Offerings for Communications Service Providers

Reducing the Risks of BYOD with Nominum's Security Solution

Nominum and IBM Partner Around Big Data

Virgin Media Selects Nominum to Support London Underground WiFi Roll-out

How Secure is Your Mobile Network? And Does It Even Matter? (Webinar)

Nominum Survey of World's Leading ISPs Shows Nearly 60% of ISPs Plan to Roll-Out IPv6 by End of 2012

Nominum Launches Comprehensive Suite of DNS-Based Security Solutions for Russian Service Providers

Nominum Sets New Record for Network Speed and Efficiency

Implementing a Cyber-Security Code of Conduct: Real-Life Lessons From Australia (Webinar)

Australian ISP iiNet selects ARI Registry Services to Help It Apply for and Operate .iinet TLD

Nominum Launches World's First Purpose-Built Suite of DNSā€Based Solutions for Mobile Operators

Verisign to Award New Infrastructure Research Grants

Breaking the DNS: Another Look at How SOPA Could Be Destructive

eComm 2009: Discussions on Restructuring Global Telecoms

Nominum CEO: Commercial vs. Open Source - Let Customers Choose

Ben Scott and Free Press in the Network Age

Supernova Interview: David Isenberg

Sponsored Topics