Stay informed about the acquisition of Public Interest Registry

by Ethos Capital

Home / Blogs

Singular and Plural TLDs: A Rather Strange Decision

Jean Guillon

ICANN stated recently that it will allow similar (i.e. singular and plural) versions of the same string to co-exist for new Top-Level Domains (TLDs). This surprising decision immediately begs the question:

"Will ICANN give holders of a string first refusal on the (singular or plural) version that they do not already hold during the next round of applications where only one version (singular or plural) of a string has been awarded?"

ICANN would be well-advised to answer this question very swiftly — and to do so in the affirmative. In so doing, ICANN would ensure the fair treatment of those who demonstrated their trust in it by acting first and taking all the associated risks.

By Jean Guillon, New gTLDs "only".
Follow CircleID on
Related topics: ICANN, New TLDs

If you are pressed for time ...

... this is for you. More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Vinton Cerf, Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Share your comments

Really? John Levine  –  Jul 10, 2013 12:22 PM PDT

Do you think the applicant for DUNS should automatically have DUN, and the applicant for BLUE should automatically have BLUES?

First come first served in Round 2? Jean Guillon  –  Jul 11, 2013 10:03 AM PDT

Not automatically but first applicant should have his word to say.

I already imagine a second round following a "first come first served" rule…

JeanWhile I agree that the decision is Michele Neylon  –  Jul 10, 2013 12:27 PM PDT


While I agree that the decision is a bit strange, I'm not sure I follow what you're asking them to do.

And I also think that looking at this from the perspective of an applicant / registry operator is fundamentally flawed.

Any issues around singulars vs plurals should be looked at from the perspective of a prospective registrant (or even a registrar)


How about ... John Levine  –  Jul 10, 2013 12:29 PM PDT

Looking at them from the point of view of the poor users who are expected to make sense of all these names, rather than the handful of people who want to profit from them?

JohnExactly.And I would include "registrars" in there, Michele Neylon  –  Jul 10, 2013 12:33 PM PDT

And I would include "registrars" in there, as I honestly can't see how on earth my staff would be able to understand the difference between two strings like that. And if they can't understand them then I can just see headaches :)


Registrants = I agree Jean Guillon  –  Jul 11, 2013 9:57 AM PDT

I think this question is crucial for round 2 and it should be discussed.
Decision about singulars and plurals should certainly not have been taken recently but written black on white in the applicant guidebook.

One question here: why would Registrars have their word to say here?

To post comments, please login or create an account.



New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias


Sponsored byVerisign

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias

IP Addressing

Sponsored byAvenue4 LLC


Sponsored byWhoisXML API


Sponsored byThreat Intelligence Platform

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppdetex

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign