Home / Blogs

NEW CEO, Trademark Clearinghouse, URS and RAA Take Center Stage at ICANN 45 in Toronto

Elisa Cooper

At his first meeting as CEO of ICANN, Fadi Chehade showed up ready to work AND to listen. ICANN's new CEO described his objectives for the organization which included 1) affirmation of purpose, 2) operational excellence, 3) internationalization, and 4) evolution of the multi-stakeholder model on which ICANN is built. He also described significant organizational changes to ICANN leadership and staff to support public engagement, technical functions, registry and registrar services, contractual compliance, communications, and stakeholder and governance support. Generally speaking, attendees at the ICANN meeting were encouraged by what they heard from the new CEO.

In addition to the excitement surrounding the new CEO, a number of other issues also took center stage at the Toronto meeting including the Prioritization Draw, the Trademark Clearinghouse, the URS (Uniform Rapid Suspension), the RAA (Registrar Accreditation Agreement) Negotiations and Whois.

Prioritization Draw for New gTLD Applications

Just prior to meeting, ICANN published a plan for the prioritizing of new gTLD applications through the steps leading to delegation. This new plan describes the assignment of priorities through the use of a Draw or Drawing — the priority assigned to each application will be used to schedule the release of initial evaluation results, pre-delegation testing, and contract execution. To participate in the Draw, applicants will be required to purchase a ticket for $100. The Draw is tentatively scheduled for early December 2012. With this new proposal, internationalized top-level domains will be given preference and the first set of initial evaluation results is scheduled for release towards end of March 2013, with the first new gTLDs being delegated in Q2 of next year.

Trademark Clearinghouse

Attendees at the ICANN Meeting were given a sneak peek into the Trademark Clearinghouse. While the bulk of the development work has been completed, it appears that some refinements are still required before submissions can be accepted. There are also some questions regarding how data within the Trademark Clearinghouse will be accessed, and there are two different models being proposed — a decentralized model where each registry would receive a copy of the Trademark Clearinghouse database, and a centralized model where registries would access data directly from the Trademark Clearinghouse. At this point, the Trademark Clearinghouse is expected to begin accepting submissions in Q1 of 2013. (MarkMonitor will be providing Trademark Clearinghouse submission services.)

URS (Uniform Rapid Suspension)

The (URS) was meant to provide low cost alternative to UDRP for the suspension of clearly infringing domains. According to ICANN, URS fees were originally targeted at $300 – $500, however there were no providers willing offer the service at this price point. As a result, ICANN issued an RFI in September of this year to identify additional providers. Some in the community have asked ICANN to underwrite the URS for a period of time.

RAA (Registrar Accreditation Agreement) Negotiations

ICANN and Accredited Registrars (with input from Government and Law Enforcement) continue to work towards amendments to the RAA. Significant progress has been made on areas related to Whois verification and data retention, though certain key issues remain open. According to ICANN, a draft of the RAA will be posted for public comment by the end of December and a new version will be finalized by March of next year.

Whois

Earlier this year, the Whois Policy Review Team published their final report containing 16 recommendations including making Whois a strategic priority, defining a single policy, implementation of Proxy / Privacy Accreditation program, adopting new standards to support IDNs, etc. Some had expected the recommendations to simply be implemented by ICANN staff, but the ICANN Board asked the policy-making group within ICANN to assist in determining whether to proceed with implementation of the recommendations or whether a full Policy Development Process should be initiated instead.

By Elisa Cooper, VP Product Marketing at MarkMonitor. Elisa Cooper also contributes to the MarkMonitor weblog located here.

Related topics: Domain Names, ICANN, Internet Governance, Policy & Regulation, Top-Level Domains, Whois

WEEKLY WRAP — Get CircleID's Weekly Summary Report by Email:

Comments

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Topics

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

.nyc Goes Public to Brand the Big Apple

pink.host: Breast Cancer Awareness by Bluehost

Introducing Our Special Edition Managed DNS Service for Top-Level Domain Operators

Afilias Director Wins ICANN's 2014 Leadership Award

Radix Announces the Addition of .tech to Its Portfolio

Infographic: Where in the World Do Chinese People Live?

Public Interest Registry Seeks Leaders to Serve on its NGO Community Advisory Council

Auctions Update: MMX Wins .law and .vip

LogicBoxes Partners with I-Content to Implement Vertical Integration for .RICH and .ONL

General Availability Kicks Off for .Website, .Press and .Host

New .ORGANIC Top-Level Domain Welcomes Leading Brands As .ORGANIC Pioneers

Dot Chinese Online and Dot Chinese Website Featured in EURid's World Report on IDNs 2014

New .ORGANIC Top-Level Domain Opens to Serve the Organic Community

DotConnectAfrica Contributes at the 9th IGF in Istanbul, Turkey

Independent Endorsement of Dot Chinese Online & Dot Chinese Website by by FiarWinds Partners

New gTLDs and Best Practices for Domain Management Policies (Video)

.Host Announces Top Global Players As Pioneer Partners

Public Interest Registry Releases Bi-Annual Report, .Org Domain Registrations Pass 10.4 Million

Public Interest Registry to Speak About Upcoming Launch of .ngo and .ong Domains for NPOs

Landrush Opens for .Website, .Press and .Host

Sponsored Topics