Home / Blogs

IPv6 "Ripeness": The Hard Numbers on ISPs and Deployment Rates

Daniel Karrenberg

RIPE Labs graph looks at IPv6 ripeness rate of all countries in the RIPE NCC service region as measured in July 2010. (Click to Enlarge)As the unallocated IPv4 address pool runs out, are Internet Service Providers (ISPs) actually deploying IPv6?

This graph, the first in a series from RIPE Labs, looks at the IPv6 "ripeness" of all ISPs registered as RIPE NCC members. We created a rating system that gives ISPs up to four "stars" for IPv6 services that they provide, based on the following criteria:

• The ISP has an IPv6 allocation
• The address prefix is actually routed on the Internet
• A route6 object is registered in the RIPE Database
• Reverse DNS has been set up

The graph illustrates countries in the RIPE NCC service region (Europe, the Middle East and parts of Asia) that have at least five ISPs; each one gets a rating ranging from zero stars to four stars. The graph indicates the level of IPv6 deployment in a specific country and in the region as a whole.

Some key findings show that:

• 27% of all ISPs in the RIPE NCC service region have at least one IPv6 allocation
• 8% have achieved four-star IPv6 ripeness
• Slovenia has the highest IPv6 deployment: 67% of all ISPs in Slovenia have at least one star and nearly 25% have four stars!

Slovenia is doing exceptionally well, undoubtedly due to a very active and persuasive IPv6 community. Of course, in a relative scoring system like this, smaller countries have a slight advantage. However, it's worth noting that the runners-up include larger economies such as Portugal, the Netherlands and Germany.

The bad news is that nearly 73% of all ISPs have not even requested IPv6 space yet (indicated by the white bars on the graph). It's surprising that so many ISPs have yet to feel the urgency to deliver their services on IPv6 to enable their business to grow, especially when only a little more than 6% of IPv4 address space remains.

The deployment rate of IPv6 is certainly lagging far behind what technical experts consider desirable, but there is clearly a positive trend. We will bring you more hard numbers on IPv6 deployment in this series.

What next?

We are considering extending our rating with a fifth star based on reachability over IPv6. We have several ideas, but we are curious to hear from you — what do you think is a good way to measure IPv6 reachability?

Read more about the methodology to collate this data on the RIPE Labs site.

By Daniel Karrenberg, Chief Scientist at the RIPE NCC
Follow CircleID on

If you are pressed for time ...

... this is for you. More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Vinton Cerf, Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Share your comments

Reachability by site/domain Paul Wilson  –  Jul 20, 2010 3:32 PM PST

Very interesting work, thanks Daniel.  Congratulations.

Mark Prior has been running a similar but different survey for some time, reporting service reachability via IPv6 for a large collection of domain names:

- http://www.mrp.net/IPv6_Survey.html

You can also check service availability for your own favourite domain name here:

- http://www.mrp.net/cgi-bin/ipv6-status.cgi

Paul Wilson

IPv6 "Content" Daniel Karrenberg  –  Jul 21, 2010 1:01 AM PST

Thanks Paul. We are trying to look at IPv6 readiness from the ISP side here. You are right that the content side is also important. Mike Leber from HE has a nice summary of that too:



To post comments, please login or create an account.



New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias


Sponsored byThreat Intelligence Platform

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias

IP Addressing

Sponsored byAvenue4 LLC


Sponsored byVerisign

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppDetex