ICANN has announced that it is seeking input and feedback on the topic of domain tasting. (See their announcement for full details)
Interestingly enough Michael Gilmour published an article a couple of days ago covering the same topic - "Why domain tasting is great!", which will probably raise a few hackles!
One point that in particular caught my eye:
Domains that are picked up in tasting that have TradeMark problems are already covered by relevant "give me back my domains" processes, either in or out of court. It's the domain owners risk to keep TM domains.
While that may be fine for big corporates, it's hardly palatable for smaller businesses that cannot afford to pay UDRP / WIPO fees plus the legal teams needed to prepare their cases.
If the copyright lobby can't catch up to their TM domains shifting every few days then this process can be solved by the registry stepping in to "lock" domains at the registry rather than the registrar where most domain tasting is taking place.
Err what now?
Registries can't really do that, which is why they rely on WIPO / UDRP for most of the gtlds.
If everyone benefits who is screaming about domain tasting? The copyright/intellectual property lawyers are having real problems with domain tasting. By the time they manage to get their C&Ds and cases together the domain is no longer registered. It's a moving target and no one to sue!
That might be the case if the domains in question aren't getting any traffic, but if they are then they're not going to be deleted by the registrar…
Traffic = revenue, which is why the tasters do it, or did I miss something?
Don't get me wrong, he does raise some very valid points and he think he's trying to provoke a reaction and debate more than anything else.
Originally posted on Michele Neylon's weblog.
|Data Center||Policy & Regulation|
|DNS Security||Regional Registries|
|Domain Names||Registry Services|
|Intellectual Property||Top-Level Domains|
|Internet of Things||Web|
|Internet Protocol||White Space|
Afilias - Mobile & Web Services