Home / Blogs

Update on Assigning 32-bit ASNs

As mentioned in Assigning 32-bit ASNs published one year ago, 16-bit Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) are becoming a scarce resource just like 32-bit IP addresses. In 2007, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) addressed this scarcity by developing a new format: 32-bit AS Numbers (RFC 4893), which increased the supply of ASNs to four billion. The RIPE NCC started assigning 32-bit ASNs (or 4-byte ASNs as they are also called) in January 2007 by default. Upon request, however, the RIPE NCC still assigns 16-bit ASNs.

In Figure 1 below, you can see how the RIPE NCC has distributed 16-bit and 32-bit ASNs since 2007 (note: numbers for 2012 only include January-June).

Figure 1: 16-bit (blue) compared to 32-bit (red) ASN assignments by the RIPE NCC

You can see that the percentage of 32-bit ASNs has been growing steadily since 2009.

In Figure 2, you can see that the RIPE NCC assigned 53% of all 32-bit ASNs. The number of 32-bit ASNs assigned by APNIC has gone up significantly since last year, however only a small percentage of these are visible in the global routing table (yet).

Figure 2: Global 32-bit ASN Distribution by RIR

Figure 3 shows advertised versus unadvertised 32-bit ASNs in the RIPE NCC service region only.

Figure 3: Distribution of advertised vs. unadvertised 32-bit ASNs in the RIPE NCC service region

Out of 2, 310 assigned 32-bit ASNs, 73% are visible in the global routing table. The remaining 620 are (not yet) visible. This is now comparable to 16-bit ASN visibility, which is an improvement compared to last year’s figures.

If operators are using up-to-date equipment and software and their upstream provider supports 32-ASNs, they should not experience any problems. The RIPE NCC itself started using 32-bit ASNs in 2007 and has not experienced any problems.

For more information and additional statistics, please see the background article on RIPE Labs.

Filed Under

Comments

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Related

Topics

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global