Home / Blogs

Warner Brothers Loses DaisyDukes.com Complaint

Warner Brothers Entertainment, which owns the rights to The Dukes of Hazzard and related characters, including DAISY DUKE, failed in its UDRP case against the registrant of the domain name DaisyDukes.com.

The Panelist determined that although WB had common law rights in the DAISY DUKE mark and the registrant lacked rights and legitimate interests in the DaisyDukes.com domain name, WB failed to demonstrate that the registrant had registered and used the domain name in bad faith.

"Respondent submits that his use of the term "daisy dukes" is not in bad faith because the term has become accepted vernacular for women's cut-off shorts and this term has been used in that connotation to attract people to this pornographic web site. The best evidence submitted by Respondent in support of that position is his submission in evidence of the lyrics of a 1992 song "Dazzey Duks" by rap artist Duice. The song repeatedly uses this term to refer to cut-off shorts and makes no reference to the Dukes of Hazzard television series. Complainant does not address this evidence in its Additional Submission and presents no counter-arguments regarding its significance. The Panel finds that this piece of unrefuted evidence slightly tips the balance in favor of Respondent."

The Panelist overlooked the fact that the meaning of of the term "daisy dukes" is taken directly from the clothing (or lack thereof) worn by and popularized by the DAISY DUKE character in the television series.

This case is probably headed to federal court.

Written by Patrick L. Jones

Related topics: DNS, Domain Names, Law

Get a weekly summary of postings to CircleID:

 Master Feed (more feeds)      Twitter      Mobile
Bookmark / Email This Post

Comments

Re: Warner Brothers Loses DaisyDukes.com Complaint Daniel R. Tobias  –  Feb 09, 2006 9:24 AM PST

A word or phrase could originate from a trademark (registered or common-law), but that does not necessarily stop it from acquiring a generic sense that the trademark owner can't legally control. For instance, "SPAM" is a trademark for a meat product, but its generic sense of "junk e-mail" is out of the control of Hormel, much as they probably dislike being associated with such a thing.

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Other Topics

Access Providers Broadband Censorship Cloud Computing Cyberattack Cybercrime Cybersquatting Data Center DNS DNSSEC Domain Names Domain Registries Email Enum ICANN Internet Governance Internet Protocol IP Addressing IPTV IPv6 Law Malware Mobile Multilinguism Net Neutrality P2P Policy & Regulation Privacy Regional Registries Security Spam Telecom Top-Level Domains VoIP Web White Space Whois Wireless



Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

ICANN and Cybersecurity: Hot Topics at The First Ever .ORG Forum

Using .ORG Directory to Find Haiti Relief Organizations

Neustar Releases UltraDNS Report Center

Afilias Releases .INFO Domain 2009 Annual Report

Expressions of Interest a Requirement for New gTLDs?

Neustar Implements DNS Security Extensions in the .US Registry

Paid Search Ads Can Lead to Fake Goods

Neustar Launches Initiative to Enhance DNS With Faster, More Secure Updates

Registry Stakeholder Group Comments on Latest ICANN Policies

Open Phishing Season

dotMobi Is Now a Member of The LACTLD

Nominum Announces "DNSSEC Made Easy" Solutions

Afilias Announces Winners of the 2009 .INFO Awards

Vote for the Best .INFO Web Site Of 2009

.ORG Highlighted for Success in Fighting Phishing

Afilias' Matt Pounsett Elected Director-at-Large for DNS-OARC

.ORG Wins WebAward for Website Redesign and Selected as a Finalist for the NonProfit PR Awards

Afilias Announces 2009 .INFO Award Judges Panel

.ORG Meets the SedoPro Partner Forum

dotMobi Announces Unique Mobile Domain and Keyword Bundle for Chinese Brands and Businesses