Home / Blogs

Warner Brothers Loses DaisyDukes.com Complaint

Warner Brothers Entertainment, which owns the rights to The Dukes of Hazzard and related characters, including DAISY DUKE, failed in its UDRP case against the registrant of the domain name DaisyDukes.com.

The Panelist determined that although WB had common law rights in the DAISY DUKE mark and the registrant lacked rights and legitimate interests in the DaisyDukes.com domain name, WB failed to demonstrate that the registrant had registered and used the domain name in bad faith.

"Respondent submits that his use of the term "daisy dukes" is not in bad faith because the term has become accepted vernacular for women's cut-off shorts and this term has been used in that connotation to attract people to this pornographic web site. The best evidence submitted by Respondent in support of that position is his submission in evidence of the lyrics of a 1992 song "Dazzey Duks" by rap artist Duice. The song repeatedly uses this term to refer to cut-off shorts and makes no reference to the Dukes of Hazzard television series. Complainant does not address this evidence in its Additional Submission and presents no counter-arguments regarding its significance. The Panel finds that this piece of unrefuted evidence slightly tips the balance in favor of Respondent."

The Panelist overlooked the fact that the meaning of of the term "daisy dukes" is taken directly from the clothing (or lack thereof) worn by and popularized by the DAISY DUKE character in the television series.

This case is probably headed to federal court.

Written by Patrick L. Jones

Related topics: DNS, Domain Names, Law

Get a weekly summary of postings to CircleID:

 Master Feed (more feeds)      Twitter      Mobile
Bookmark / Email This Post

Comments

Re: Warner Brothers Loses DaisyDukes.com Complaint Daniel R. Tobias  –  Feb 09, 2006 10:24 AM PDT

A word or phrase could originate from a trademark (registered or common-law), but that does not necessarily stop it from acquiring a generic sense that the trademark owner can't legally control. For instance, "SPAM" is a trademark for a meat product, but its generic sense of "junk e-mail" is out of the control of Hormel, much as they probably dislike being associated with such a thing.

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Latest Brandjacking Index Examines How Fraudsters Abuse Financial Brands

MarkMonitor at 2009 Trademark, Anti-Counterfeiting and Grey Market Fraud Mitigation Summit

NeuStar Addresses DNS Vulnerability with Cache Defender, a Secure DNS Authentication System

NeuStar Celebrates 10 Years of UltraDNS Managed DNS Service

A Seemingly Overwhelming Number of Important Documents Released by ICANN

.ORG First Open Top-Level Domain to be Signed with DNSSEC

Expanding Internet Access Driving Software Piracy, Study Says

DNSSEC Industry Coalition Symposium is Announced

dotMobi Names AutoTrader.mobi as Millionth Site Tested by Acclaimed mobiReady Tool

NeuStar's UltraDNS to Power Growth of NDTV Convergence

SPIL GAMES Chooses MarkMonitor for Global Domain Management

Mobile Banking Benchmarks Now Available

Facebook Selects MarkMonitor Antifraud Solutions to Combat Malware

Perspectives from a Nonprofit Domain Name Registry on Navigating the Social Media Frontier

Flawed Economic Analysis of New gTLDs

Benchmarks that Measure Five Critical Dimensions of Success for Mobile Websites

IP Rights in Digital Environment Key Element of Proposed Treaty

MarkMonitor AntiFraud Solutions, Combining Proven Antiphishing and Expert Antimalware Capabilities

Go Daddy Launches Instant Mobilizer from dotMobi

New Study of Mobile Web Trends Demonstrates Strong Growth of Mobile Content Availability