Home / Blogs

Time to Regulate Google?

Should Google's provision of information services be regulated? Yes, if the decision is based on Google's own standards for determining whether to regulate tele-information companies.

In recent comments to the FCC, Google described "broadband openness" rules, aka net neutrality, as a "fundamental necessity." Without such rules, the search engine giant, aka Big Search, fears that broadband providers would "promote only their own pecuniary interests over the far broader interests of Internet users..."

As the Wall Street Journal noted last year, however, Google engages in the same type of discriminatory service practices they want the federal government to prohibit other companies from engaging in. Google Voice is a call forwarding service that allows users to have a single phone number that can reach all of their handsets (work, home, mobile, etc.). Instead of operating in an open, neutral manner, the WSJ explains that Google "is systematically blocking calls to phone numbers in some rural areas" that cost more to connect. Telcos are required by the FCC to complete those rural calls. Apparently Google has no objections to using discriminatory telecom practices to promote their own pecuniary interests.

The question of whether to regulate Google is not new. As SearchEngineLand.com reported, the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council has already raised the question as to whether net neutrality regulations should be applied to Google.

Google told the Commission that "broadband is far too important...to leave it solely to a failed market..." The unanswered question is what market failure? As The Economist explains, market failure occurs when "a market left to itself does not allocate resources efficiently. Interventionist politicians usually allege market failure to justify their interventions." Google has made no demonstration that broadband resources are not efficiently allocated. To the contrary, the company's rent-seeking activities to maximize their shareholder value could well result in a less efficient allocation of bandwidth.

Should Google be regulated? Only by their own standards. By the standards of Executive Order 12866, the FCC has no basis for subjecting any company to new Title II/net neutrality regulation.

By Bruce Levinson, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Intervention

Related topics: Broadband, Net Neutrality, Policy & Regulation, Telecom

WEEKLY WRAP — Get CircleID's Weekly Summary Report by Email:

Comments

Google's pecuniary interests? Really? Alex Geroulaitis  –  Jun 22, 2010 5:12 PM PDT

Are "pecuniary interests" applicable to a free service such as Google Voice?  How does one regulate free services?

On what basis can one compare monopolistic and often unreasonably priced services by local telcos, to a free service such as Google Voice?

Does the concept of Net Neutrality (where transmission of an IP packet has fixed costs regardless of the destination) apply to telco services where call connection costs vary greatly depending on the destination?

Is it time yet to regulate Bruce Levinson's blog posts where they fail to mention facts crucial to understanding the topic? :)

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Topics

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Implementing a Cyber-Security Code of Conduct: Real-Life Lessons From Australia (Webinar)

Internet Governance Update: Battle Royale Is Here

DotConnectAfrica Participates at ICANN 43 In Costa Rica, the "Rich Coast"

Neustar and University of Illinois Launch the Neustar Innovation Center

Sedari Seeking Certainty in the ICANN TLD Process

Nominum Launches World's First Purpose-Built Suite of DNS‐Based Solutions for Mobile Operators

MarkMonitor to Exhibit at Internet Tech Policy Exhibition and Reception to be Held on Capitol Hill

Afilias Says "No" to SOPA

Breaking the DNS: Another Look at How SOPA Could Be Destructive

An Interview with DotConnectAfrica's Executive Director, Sophia Bekele

Neustar Names Joe Pasqua to Head Neustar Labs

ICANN's COI plus the EBERO: A Recipe to Create Failed Domain Name Registries

Interactive Investor Interviews Antony Van Couvering and Peter Dengate Thrush

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Singapore

President Obama Names Neustar President and CEO Lisa Hook to NSTAC

Digital Hollywood Taps Domain Name Expert Ben Crawford for Insight on New Internet Policy

Verisign CEO to Serve on President Obama's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee

Brussels and the Month Afterwards: Celebrations, New gTLD and Security and Stability Issues Ahead

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Brussels

A Summary and Analysis of ICANN's Public Comment Period on Dot-XXX

Hot Topics

Afilias

DNS Security

Sponsored by
Afilias
dotMobi

Mobile

Sponsored by
dotMobi
Verisign

Security

Sponsored by
Verisign
Nominum

IPv6

Sponsored by
Nominum
Neustar UltraDNS

DNS

Sponsored by
Neustar UltraDNS
Minds + Machines

Top-Level Domains

Sponsored by
Minds + Machines