Home / News

Court OKs Private Seizure of Domain Names That Allegedly Sold Counterfeit Goods

Luxury brand Chanel has engaged in a fierce campaign against counterfeit websites in federal court in Nevada. It has seized approximately six hundred domain names in the last few months, reports Venkat Balasubramani. "I'm sympathetic to the "whack-a-mole" problem rights owners face, but this relief is just extraordinarily broad and is on shaky procedural grounds."

Related topics: Cybersquatting, Domain Names, Law

 
   
WEEKLY WRAP — Get CircleID's Weekly Summary Report by Email:

Comments

Horribly wrong Paul Keating  –  Dec 01, 2011 2:40 AM PDT

This is a horrible decision which is not based upon the law but rather upon a court being subjected to the arguments and allegations of one side - the plaintiff.  That the other side did not show up is a shame but given the economic value of an individual domain (not to mention the location of the registrants in many cases) vs the costs of litigation in the US, it is unfortunately understandable.

The taking of the domain names is a remedy but not at the injunction stage.  There is no statute that provides support for such a pre-emptive solution, particularly with an intangible right as represented by a a domain name.  The process does allow for a plaintiff to obtain a judgment (requiring proof) and then to levy on that judgment if not satisfied.

I understand the "wack-a-mole" problem.  But how is this different in any manner than a flea market or E-bay issue?  One would not expect a court to order, at a preliminary injunction stage, that the plaintiff was entitled to the flea market location or the E-bay account.  Plaintiffs are quick to argue that the domain name problem is unique because anyone can set up a domain name.  How is that different than anything else?

I could park my car by the road, put up a sign for "cheap bags" and sell knock-offs.  Does this allow the plaintiff to the title to my car?  The factories that pump out knock-offs are largely those producing the real McCoy.  They are able to sell them anywhere they can obtain a buyer.  Will seizing domains at a preliminary injunction stage stop this?  No.  Those that wish to will simply get another domain, advertise to obtain traffic and continue to sell.  As said, this is no different from any other example.  There is no logical or legal basis for creating new rules just because it is "....the Internet!...".  The same rules adopted in the "real world" should apply for the simple reason that they are there to prevent abuse by the plaintiff - they protect the minority and just as the rules applicable to the criminal system may be over-expansive in terms of protection of the defendant, so to are the rules applicable to the civil realm.  This is how it should be. 

The plaintiffs would no doubt argue that this will increase their costs.  Lets not forget that this entire exercise was to protect a government granted monopoly.  Having received the benefits of the monopoly, the TM holder should bear the burden of the costs.

The preclusion on the use of the domain name is something that could be ordered by the court.  The order can simply direct the registry NOT to allocate the domain name for registration.  Of course, this would require that the domain name itself be infringing - a situation not presented by the court action described above - where most of the domains were akin to "cheaphandbags.com" and were allegedly selling knock-offs.

Paul Keating

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Explore Topics

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Radix Launches Startup League at TechCrunch

Celebrating One Year of .online

LogicBoxes Launches the New Elite Reseller Program

Effective Strategies to Build Your Reseller Channel (Webinar)

Facilitating a Trusted Web Space for Financial Service Professionals

.STORE Grosses Over $1 Million Before the Close of Day 1

News.Markets: A Rising Star in the World of Financial Trading and New TLDs

Verisign Announces .コム Domain Names Are Now Available for Anyone to Register

NBA & NFL Teams Drive .store Sunrise Score to 647

New TLD .STORE Crosses 500+ Sunrise Applications

Meet Boston Ivy, Home to Some of the Most Specialized TLDs in the Financial Services Sector

Move Beyond Defensive Domain Name Registrations, Towards Strategic Thinking

Verisign Launches New gTLDs for the Korean Market, .닷컴 and .닷넷

Verisign Opens Landrush Program Period for .コム Domain Names

Domain Management Handbook from MarkMonitor

Afilias Announces Relaunch of .GREEN TLD

New .PROMO Domain Sunrise Period Begins Today

US Court Grants DCA Trust's Motion for Preliminary Injunction on .Africa gTLD

Minds + Machines Group Announces Outsourcing Agreements, Web Address Change

.STORE Opens its Doors to Brands

Sponsored Topics

Afilias

DNS Security

Sponsored by
Afilias
Port25

Email

Sponsored by
Port25
Afilias - Mobile & Web Services

Mobile

Sponsored by
Afilias - Mobile & Web Services
Verisign

Security

Sponsored by
Verisign