How do we make DNSSEC even more secure through the use of elliptic curve cryptography? What are the advantages of algorithms based on elliptic curves? And what steps need to happen to make this a reality? What challenges lie in the way?
Over the past few months we've been discussing these questions within the community of people implementing DNSSEC, with an aim of increasing both the security and performance of DNSSEC. Ondřej Surý of CZ.NIC Labs has been leading the way both with writing Internet drafts (draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-ed25519 and draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-ed448) and also in helping to organize sessions at various events.
Here's a brief view of where that discussion has and will be taking place:
Let me provide a quick overview of what happened at ICANN 55 and then explain a new Internet draft that came out of that experience.
ICANN 55 DNSSEC Workshop
At ICANN 55 in Marrakech, we had a panel that I moderated where we presented several different viewpoints about how we go about implementing new DNSSEC algorithms and what are the challenges. I started out with a presentation where I outlined some of the challenges in this set of slides:
I was then followed by four panelists (links are to the slide decks three of the four panelists had):
Geoff Huston started out giving an overview of what APNIC's research had found in the support of a current elliptic curve algorithm (ECDSA) in DNS resolvers (remembering that there are two sides to DNSSEC). Jim Galvin then provided a view of DNSSEC algorithms from a registry perspective. Olafur reported on the experience CloudFlare had rolling out ECDSA support and Ondřej wrapped up the session explaining the two new elliptic curve algorithms proposed for DNSSEC. There were a good number of questions asked and it was a healthy discussion.
Our Internet Draft on new deploying DNSSEC algorithms
After that ICANN 55 session, I went back and wrote up a summary of what we learned out of that discussion and then incorporated further input from Ondřej, Ólafur and Paul Wouters. The result was a new Internet-draft:
As I said in the abstract:
As new cryptographic algorithms are developed for use in DNSSEC signing and validation, this document captures the steps needed for new algorithms to be deployed and enter general usage. The intent is to ensure a common understanding of the typical deployment process and potentially identify opportunities for improvement of operations.
We are looking forward to further discussion — and welcome any and all feedback on the document.
The DNS-OARC panel on Friday, April 1
Which leads to a mention of the next discussion happening on this Friday, April 1, at the DNS-OARC 24th meeting happening in Buenos Aires right before IETF 95. The very last session from 1700-1745 ART (UTC-3) will be on "DNSSEC algorithm flexibility”. I'll be moderating the panel again and the focus this time will be on software implementations and what needs to be done there to support more encryption algorithms. The panelists will include:
I'm told there will be a live stream of the DNS-OARC session and it should be accessible from the DNS-OARC Google+ page.
Our goal with all of this work is to lay out a solid path forward to bringing strong elliptic curve algorithms to DNSSEC — and then making that plan a reality. The end goal is an even more secure DNSSEC infrastructure that brings about an even more trusted DNS.
We'd welcome your comments and assistance with this — please do send us comments on the Internet Draft (email addresses at the end) or comment here or on social media about any of this. We need many different people helping move this forward!
NOTE: An earlier version of this article appeared on the Internet Society Deploy360 blog.
By Dan York, Author and Speaker on Internet technologies - and on staff of Internet Society. Dan is employed as a Senior Content Strategist with the Internet Society but opinions posted on CircleID are entirely his own. Visit the blog maintained by Dan York here.
|Data Center||Policy & Regulation|
|DNS Security||Regional Registries|
|Domain Names||Registry Services|
|Intellectual Property||Top-Level Domains|
|Internet of Things||Web|
|Internet Protocol||White Space|
With a mission to make its top-level domains available to the broadest market possible, Boston Ivy has permanently reduced its registration, renewal and transfer prices for .Broker, .Forex, .Markets and .Trading. more»
Afilias - Mobile & Web Services