Home / Blogs

"ICANN Urged to Rule on .LLP 'Breach'"

Jeanette Heller

There is probably no worldwide community without at least one member located in the US. But does this qualify the closing of a community to only US based members and, by extension, to exclude all other eligible entities from around the world solely because of arbitrary geographical circumstances based upon company whims?

As affected by the article in the WIPR (PDF), published on 31st October 2013, InterNetX, the parent company of the mentioned myLLP applicant for .LLP, would like to clarify some issues on its own behalf.

The mission of myLLP's new gTLD application for the .LLP Top Level Domain is to provide a namespace on the internet where businesses may establish meaningful and trusted identities to promote their companies. As the Government Advisory Committee (GAC) has outlined in its Beijing Communiqué, within the corporate identifier namespace this cannot be accomplished in an unregulated TLD.

As requested by the GAC earlier in the application process, we have submitted Public Interest Commitments (PIC) for several of our Corporate Identifier applications in order to mitigate these concerns. Furthermore, the remedies suggested by ICANN and recently published by the NGPC to comply with the GAC advice of the Beijing Communiqué, point out that our PICs are consistent with their advice. We are more than willing to apply our detailed PICs to each of our submitted applications.

Any TLD application for a corporate identifier that does not allow all eligible companies within countries where the respective legal forms exist to register domains in these TLDs, are likely to discriminate some users.

The issue raised in the WIPR article, that an applicant could breach the rules by restricting the TLD only to customers from the US, does not occur solely in the case of .LLP, but also for .LLC and additional corporate identifier applications (.INC, etc).
Restricting eligible registrants in these TLDs to certain countries is contrary to the general rules of openness and non-discrimination requested by the GAC, ICANN and the Applicant Guidebook and therefore it can certainly not be the basis for a successful community status validation.

By Jeanette Heller, Domain Registry Services - InterNetX GmbH
Follow CircleID on

If you are pressed for time ...

... this is for you. More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Vinton Cerf, Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Share your comments

Like Jeanette Heller and InterNetX, Afilias would John Kane  –  Nov 18, 2013 2:27 PM PDT

Like Jeanette Heller and InterNetX, Afilias would prefer to have corporate identifier TLDs that are available in all countries where such terms are legally used and recognized, and will be welcomed as relevant to local businesses, regardless of geography. Further, the applicants for these TLDs that claim to represent these corporate communities narrowly define eligible registrants along geographic lines; they have clearly ignored the global scope of these TLDs. Attempts to limit the availability of corporate identifier domains by geography is discrimination and will likely have the effect of stifling Internet innovation, the opposite of the intention of ICANN’s New gTLD Program.

To post comments, please login or create an account.



IP Addressing

Sponsored byAvenue4 LLC

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias


Sponsored byThreat Intelligence Platform

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias


Sponsored byWhoisXML API


Sponsored byVerisign