Stay informed about the acquisition of Public Interest Registry

by Ethos Capital

Home / Blogs

Driving DNSSEC: The Need for Integration of All the Functions Needed

Bruce Van Nice

DNSSEC continues to gain momentum as network operators and domain owners watch and learn from early adopters. The learning process is made easier by efforts such as the ongoing work conducted by researchers at Sandia labs to methodically identify and categorize the kinds of problems that are occurring.

The early experience has validated the need for integration of all the functions needed for DNSSEC. It's not realistic to expect DNS administrators to pull together all the piece parts that are needed. Automation is also essential, if technically astute organizations are tripped up by mandatory maintenance and intricate processes (like rolling over Key Signing Keys) then others will be too.

Evidence of the value of better tools can be found out in the marketplace. Comcast recently promoted their deployment of DNSSEC across their network of more than 18 million subscribers and signing of more than 5000 domains. They've demonstrated DNSSEC can be deployed at massive scale by taking advantage of better DNS software. Adoption of every new technology accelerates when a major player takes the lead, a large scale deployment validates what is possible and positions DNSSEC at the base of the power curve.

DNSSEC has also been on the agenda at the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC). In a recent speech Julius Genachowski, Chairman of the FCC, not only urged service providers to take voluntary action to deter the spread of botnets, he also urged them to adopt DNSSEC.

ISPs that adopt DNSSEC, Genachowski said, "can provide a real and tangible benefit to the consumers and businesses that rely on them." He pushed ISPs to implement it "as soon as possible."

Directly from his speech: "If they adopt DNSSEC, ISPs can provide a real and tangible benefit to the consumers and businesses that rely on them. DNSSEC is ready to be implemented. Indeed, at least one major U.S. ISP has already completed implementation of DNSSEC."

As security becomes a part of brand equity, service providers and domain owners everywhere will recognize the value of improving their stature. Leadership on the part of large ISPs demonstrate that with the right tools even complex technologies like DNSSEC can be deployed and deliver real benefits to end users. Better still, security also does not have to exist in isolation but can be part of a larger strategy that incorporates other business enhancing initiatives such as subscriber loyalty and business intelligence.

By Bruce Van Nice, Senior Product Marketing Manager at Akamai
Follow CircleID on
Related topics: Cybersecurity, DNS, DNS Security

If you are pressed for time ...

... this is for you. More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Vinton Cerf, Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Share your comments

I'm sorry David A. Ulevitch  –  Apr 18, 2012 8:39 PM PDT

Creating an echo chamber doesn't create security.  I'm sorry to be the contrarian here, but this is simply furthering false assumptions.  First, Genachowski is simply repeating already inaccurate rhetoric that he has been supplied. 

Automation is not security.  Automation for DNSSEC is not security. 

DNSSEC doesn't provide encryption (though, shockingly, many technologists I talk with believe it does!). 

DNSSEC centralizes points of failure and introduces brittleness into a robust system.  Key rollover has been a pain point for nearly everyone.  False signings has forced Comcast to short circuit DNSSEC validation (and therefore disabling DNSSEC!). 

The lack of application support makes the difference between an error and a DNSSEC validation equivalent to users which is a terrible user experience.

Lastly, mechanisms to provide trust and authenticity are better deployed in a distributed fashion like the EFF's project.

There is a big business around pushing DNSSEC, but I'm hard pressed to see how it will actually improve end-user security.

It's not an echo chamber Bruce Van Nice  –  Apr 20, 2012 10:49 AM PDT

Hi David:

Thanks for your comments.

Couple of things – first I am not suggesting automation equals security – but rather DNSSEC can be made more deployable, and some of the early problems can be addressed, with more automated tools.  I don’ think this is an especially controversial point. 

The lack of encryption in DNSSEC isn’t an oversight – it’s by design - so shouldn’t be “shocking”.  The authentication and data integrity services it provides can rightfully be called security. 

It’s not just Genachowski advocating for DNSSEC – as you well know there are a multitude of Internet and security experts who are behind it. 

The good news about our industry is it’s always open to better solutions – that’s the essence of the Internet – perhaps some will emerge in this area.
For now we’ve made a lot of progress with DNSSEC, and as the editorial suggests, with better tools we can make even more, that can only be for the good. 
There is a strong belief that the investment in DNSSEC will pay off when sensitive applications, such as banking or commerce, can truly trust the data they get from the DNS.

To post comments, please login or create an account.




Sponsored byThreat Intelligence Platform

IP Addressing

Sponsored byAvenue4 LLC

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias


Sponsored byVerisign

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppdetex

New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias