Home / Blogs

The Broadband Adoption Rate

Susan Crawford

Yesterday's FCC report [PDF] estimates that at least 80 million Americans don't have high-speed Internet access — defined as download speeds of at least 4 Mbps and upload 1 Mbps — at home. (Soon the Commission will release another report comparing these results to those in other countries.)

This service is completely unavailable to at least 14 million Americans — the FCC estimates that "1,024 out of 3,230 counties in the United States and its territories are unserved by broadband[, and t]hese unserved areas are home to 24 million Americans living in 8.9 million households." Particularly for Americans in poorer areas, more rural counties, and tribal lands, adequate connectivity isn't even a possibility currently. The Commission has now said that those Americans will not gain such access in the near future absent changes in policy.

While not downplaying what the carriers in America have already done, the FCC is making clear that much more needs to happen. In a heavily footnoted report, the Commission is saying what most Americans already know: "Given the ever-growing importance of broadband to our society, we are unable to conclude that broadband is being reasonably and timely deployed to all Americans in this situation."

By Susan Crawford, Professor, Cardozo Law School in New York City. Visit the blog maintained by Susan Crawford here.

Related topics: Access Providers, Broadband, Policy & Regulation, Telecom

WEEKLY WRAP — Get CircleID's Weekly Summary Report by Email:

Comments

Sidelining Joly MacFie  –  Jul 21, 2010 1:18 PM PST

Implicit in the figures above is that there are 56 million Americans to whom service is available but who, for one reason or another, choose not to subscribe.

Indeed Bloomberg quotes Commissioner McDowell as saying “The majority is sidelining the deployment figure of 95 percent in favor of a seemingly smaller subscribership number”.

This itself sidelines the truth, as this report to the FCC found, that both high prices and poor service are major impediments to adoption in low-income areas.

Adoption vs. Deployment Richard Bennett  –  Jul 22, 2010 12:32 PM PST

The FCC report obscures the important distinction between broadband availability and use. As Commissioner McDowell said, it's *available* to 95% of Americans even if you don't count satellite and 3G as broadband options; the FCC report doesn't count them. The problem we have with broadband in America is that 25% of the people who could use it choose not to, for one reason or another. Price is not the issue, as the US has some of the lowest prices in the world for basic broadband service of the 1.5 Mbps variety (which the FCC no longer considers "real broadband."

The problem is that most of the people who don't subscribe don't own a computer or see any reason to get one. See the ITIF comments on the FCC report for a better picture.

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Topics

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

MarkMonitor to Exhibit at Internet Tech Policy Exhibition and Reception to be Held on Capitol Hill

Verisign to Award New Infrastructure Research Grants

Afilias Says "No" to SOPA

Breaking the DNS: Another Look at How SOPA Could Be Destructive

An Interview with DotConnectAfrica's Executive Director, Sophia Bekele

Neustar Names Joe Pasqua to Head Neustar Labs

ICANN's COI plus the EBERO: A Recipe to Create Failed Domain Name Registries

Interactive Investor Interviews Antony Van Couvering and Peter Dengate Thrush

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Singapore

President Obama Names Neustar President and CEO Lisa Hook to NSTAC

Digital Hollywood Taps Domain Name Expert Ben Crawford for Insight on New Internet Policy

Verisign CEO to Serve on President Obama's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee

Brussels and the Month Afterwards: Celebrations, New gTLD and Security and Stability Issues Ahead

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Brussels

A Summary and Analysis of ICANN's Public Comment Period on Dot-XXX

Our Response to ICANN Re: The Dot-XXX Top-Level Domain

ICANN and Accountability: Time to Walk the Walk

72 Confirmed Talks - If You're Attending, Now is the Time to Register

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Nairobi

ICANN and Cybersecurity: Hot Topics at The First Ever .ORG Forum

Hot Topics

Verisign

Security

Sponsored by
Verisign
Neustar UltraDNS

DNS

Sponsored by
Neustar UltraDNS
dotMobi

Mobile

Sponsored by
dotMobi
Afilias

DNSSEC

Sponsored by
Afilias
Minds + Machines

Top-Level Domains

Sponsored by
Minds + Machines