Related News
ICANN Highlights DNS Vulnerability, Releases Domain Testing Tool
- Aug 07, 2008
- Comments: 0
Day 30: Kaminsky DNS Bug Disclosure
- Aug 06, 2008
- Comments: 3
Apple Finally Patches DNS Flaw
- Aug 01, 2008
- Comments: 3
U.S. Intends to Remain in Full Control of Internet Root Zone, Says Letter from NTIA
- Jul 31, 2008
- Comments: 0
DNS Attack Creator Becomes a Victim of His Own Creation
- Jul 30, 2008
- Comments: 2
Related Blogs
Will .cn Become the New .com?
- Aug 20, 2008
- Comments: 0
ICANN's Allocation Method for New TLDs
- Aug 15, 2008
- Comments: 0
A Secure Recursive Caching DNS Server
- Aug 12, 2008
- Comments: 0
ICANN Paints Itself Into a Corner
- Aug 11, 2008
- Comments: 1
ICANN to Auction New Generic Top Level Domains
- Aug 09, 2008
- Comments: 2
Industry Updates
Did We Miss ICANN's Reply?
- By PIR
- Views: 26
dotMobi Builds on Breakthough DeviceAtlas Mobile Development Tool
- By dotMobi
- Views: 71
Hostway Announces "The .Pro Red Carpet VIP Affair" Domain Reservation Period
- By RegistryPro
- Views: 66
On the Pressing Need for a Signed Root
- By PIR
- Views: 228
dotMobi Premium Domain Name Now Supports Independent and Established Music Acts
- By dotMobi
- Views: 145
It would help if more of the ccTLDs provided some form of CLIbased whois or at least a DAS check.
For those of us who use command-line interfaced, the "jwhois" package is a nice transparaent interface to all of the whois services. See the jwhois page for more info.
Unfortunately jwhois does not work with a lot of the ccTLDs - I've been trying it :)
I haven't had that problem. I'm sure that the person at <help-jwhois@gnu.org> would appreciate knowing which TLDs are not working.
(Trying that again...)
I haven’t had that problem. I’m sure that the person at help-jwhois@gnu.org would appreciate knowing which TLDs are not working.