Home / Blogs

Is .SUCKS Pricing Model Gaining Traction With Other Registries?

Until the launch of the New gTLD Program, TLD launches were relatively straightforward. They generally consisted of a Sunrise Period, a Landrush Phase, and then General Availability. We would see the occasional Grandfather Phase or "Founders" program, but all in all, launches were pretty standard and straightforward.

Things started to change with the launch of the new gTLD program. Not only did the volume of launches increase, causing brand owners to make tough decisions about what and where to register, we were introduced to new launch phases, including Early Access Programs (EAP) and controversial pricing models. When the .SUCKS registry announced its pricing model earlier this year, most brand owners were upset and felt like they were being penalized by having to pay more to protect their brands.

While the .SUCKS pricing model has been quite controversial, we're starting to see other registries follow suit. One particular registry recently announced their "Brand Protection Premium Domains" and it's anticipated that most trademarks, brand names and company names will be on their Premium Domains list. Brand holders with brands/trademarks on this list that do not reserve their domain during the Sunrise Phase will have to pay more than double to register their domain during General Availability.

Another registry recently announced a similar program. Their "Protected Names" program, designed to further protect well-known entities, will consist of reserved high profile brands and names in music, sport, TV, film, celebrities, clubs, publishing and other sectors which may have fan bases. Brand holders with brands/trademarks on the Protected Names list that do not reserve their domain during the Sunrise Phase will have to pay additional fees to register their domain during General Availability.

How will brand owners react to these types of launches and inflated registration fees? Will we see even more registries implement this type of pricing model? Brand owners will have to continue making tough decisions about what, where, and when to register. For some brand owners, it may be more cost effective to register during the Sunrise period, where available. For others, they may want to wait to see if any infringement occurs and take action when necessary.

Stay tuned, I have a feeling this will continue to get very interesting.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet


You only establish a correlation based on By Alex Tajirian  –  Jun 26, 2015 12:33 am PST

You only establish a correlation based on few observations, i.e., no causality argument for the change in business models.  So, are you saying that some of the registries just woke up? Could there be a plausible logical reason for initially adopting a different pricing model? Is the new pricing change good or bad? I am a registry; I cannot “stay tuned.” What should I do?

The pubic interest in new gTLD domains By Christopher Wilkinson  –  Jul 07, 2015 10:26 am PST

Registries and Registrars should be charging Registrants the same fees for all new registrations, whether sunrise, land-rush or general availability. ICANN should police any abuses in this respect.

The 'rent' to a desirable name, if any, should accrue to the Registrant and final user.


ICANN and the pubic interest in new gTLD domains By John Poole  –  Jul 07, 2015 5:53 pm PST

Good point Christopher Wilkinson--If ICANN was really interested in the "public interest" and protecting consumers (domain name registrants), instead of being just a captured organization of the new gTLDs lobby, it would: (a) require the fees for domain name registrations be disclosed in every new gTLD Registry Agreement for the entire term of the RA, with no variances allowed for sunrise, landrush, GA, or otherwise, and no price increases allowed during the RA term; (b) open each new gTLD at the end of every RA term, for competing bids by other registry operator applicants, with award to the bidder with the lowest and best proposed registration fee schedule for the next term. Of course this will probably never happen as ICANN does not have a Registrants Stakeholder Group, unlike Registrars and Registry operators, and ICANN has no real interest in serving the public interest but only special interests like registered trademark lobbyists who have special standing within ICANN as witnessed in the dotSUCKS fiasco.

Add Your Comments

 To post your comments, please login or create an account.




Sponsored byWhoisXML API


Sponsored byThreat Intelligence Platform


Sponsored byVerisign

IP Addressing

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

DNS Security

Sponsored byAfilias

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppdetex

New TLDs

Sponsored byAfilias

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign