Home / News

Rising Concerns Over UN Anti-Cyberattack Plan: Could End Internet Anonymity

Recent reports suggest that the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a United Nations agency, is "quietly drafting technical standards, proposed by the Chinese government," aimed at preventing Internet attacks which could also put an end to anonymity on the Internet.

At an up coming ITU meeting in Geneva next week, telecommunication experts will be discussing draft recommendation of "IP Traceback" use case and requirements, looking at ways to identify the source of packets sent across IP (Internet Protocol) networks.

Also posted on Dave Farber's public mailing list, Declan McCullagh has shared some additional findings as a result of speaking to various people involved at ITU and while preparing to write his article:

  • The ITU's Q6/17 group is meeting next week in Geneva with an eye to having a final document finished sometime in 2009 (though one editor told me it might take longer). The proceedings are not open to the public—I applied to attend and was rejected—and relatively few documents are public.
  • China's proposal submitted in April says the "IP traceback mechanism is required to be adapted to various network environments, such as different addressing (IPv4 and IPv6), different access methods (wire and wireless) and different access technologies (ADSL, cable, Ethernet) and etc." It adds: "To ensure traceability, essential information of the originator should be logged."
  • An ITU network security meeting a few years ago concluded that anonymity should not be permitted. The summary said: "Anonymity was considered as an important problem on the Internet (may lead to criminality). Privacy is required but we should make sure that it is provided by pseudonymity rather than anonymity."
  • An ITU presentation in July from Korea said that groups such as the IETF should be "required to develop standards or guidelines" that could "facilitate tracing the source of an attacker including IP-level traceback, application-level traceback, user-level traceback." Another Korean proposal—which has not been made public—says all Internet providers "should have procedures to assist in the lawful traceback of security incidents."

Read full story: CNET News

Related topics: Cyberattack, Cybercrime, Internet Governance, Privacy

Get a weekly summary of postings to CircleID:

 Master Feed (more feeds)      Twitter      Mobile
Bookmark / Email This Post

Comments

My Computer != Me Chris Snyder  –  Sep 15, 2008 5:39 AM PDT

You can (and sometimes should) trace bad actions to a source computer, but that doesn't actually prove anything. Given the sophistication of virus and botnet authors, and the relative weakness of consumer operating systems and application platforms to attack, people can't actually be held accountable for what happens on the computers they own or use.

You and your computer are separate entities. Even your cellphone, once thought to be as personal a computer as you can get, is a full-fledged consumer OS running third-party applications downloaded from the 'net.

Any actual policy or law based on removing anonymity from the Internet has to address the fact that there is no way, beyond circumstantial evidence, to "trace back" the actions of a computer to a particular human operator. Anything can be scripted, and no operator has perfect knowledge of what's happening in software.

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Other Topics

Access Providers Broadband Censorship Cloud Computing Cyberattack Cybercrime Cybersquatting Data Center DNS DNSSEC Domain Names Domain Registries Email Enum ICANN Internet Governance Internet Protocol IP Addressing IPTV IPv6 Law Malware Mobile Multilinguism Net Neutrality P2P Policy & Regulation Privacy Regional Registries Security Spam Telecom Top-Level Domains VoIP Web White Space Whois Wireless

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

MarkMonitor Year in Review Report: How Escalating Online Brand Abuse is Used to Monetize Web Traffic

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Nairobi

MarkMonitor Sets New Standard in Brand Protection with Site Staydown Service

ICANN and Cybersecurity: Hot Topics at The First Ever .ORG Forum

Registry Stakeholder Group Comments on Latest ICANN Policies

Open Phishing Season

.ORG Highlighted for Success in Fighting Phishing

Afilias' Matt Pounsett Elected Director-at-Large for DNS-OARC

SPECIAL: Updates from the ICANN Meetings in Seoul

SEO Poisoning: A Persistent Malware Threat Targeting High-Profile Brands

Vertical Integration: A View from the Bottom Up

Afilias Statement on ICANN Affirmation of Committments with US Department of Commerce

Pharmaceutical Brandjacking for Popular Drug Brands on the Rise

Growing Global Adoption of Nominum's Intelligent DNS Spells Obsolescence for Legacy DNS Systems

Nominum's Intelligent DNS Gives Service Providers Commanding Advantage Against Internet Threats

MarkMonitor to Host New Webinar Series with Noted Trademark Law Authority Anne Gilson LaLonde

Nominum Delivers Service Provider Compliance Solution For Blocking Child Exploitation Sites Online

.ORG, The Public Interest Registry Advances and Makes Strides With Domain Name Security Extensions

Comments on ICANN's IRT Final Report

New ICANN Chief on gTLDs