Despite being a respectable start, security experts call the report overheated and "clear as mud"… while many experts applaud this new focus as vital to protecting critical U.S. infrastructure and economic institutions, some analysts have noted that the report fails to answer many key questions, contains a number of inconsistencies and possible inaccuracies, and generally exaggerates the threat to the country.
"It's a plan for a plan," said O. Sami Saydjari, chairman of the Professionals for Cyber Defense. "Given how bureaucracies work, they tend not to come up with bold plans in 60 days. The hard problems have yet to be grappled with."
Read full story: External Source
Related topics: Cyberattack, Policy & Regulation, Security
To post comments, please login or create an account.
DNSSECSponsored byAfilias | |
MobileSponsored bydotMobi | |
Top-Level DomainsSponsored byMinds + Machines | |
DNSSponsored byNeustar UltraDNS | |
SecuritySponsored byVerisign |