Home / News I have a News Tip

Legal Attack on ARIN Dismissed in Court

The American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) has announced [PDF] that it has prevailed in a lawsuit that challenged ARIN's ability to allocate Internet Protocol (IP) number resources fairly. The lawsuit was brought by an individual - Gary Kremen - who sought to have a netblock of IP addresses transferred to him without agreeing to ARIN's standard terms and conditions.

"Today's victory is significant for consumers who rely on the Internet to operate efficiently and effectively," said ARIN President and CEO Raymond Plzak.

Read full story: ARIN

Related topics: Cyberattack, Cybercrime, Internet Protocol, IP Addressing, Regional Registries, Registry Services

 
   

Don't miss a thing – get the Weekly Wrap delivered to your inbox.

Comments

Re: Legal Attack on ARIN Dismissed in Court Karl Auerbach  –  Dec 28, 2006 8:07 PM PDT

I think one needs to be careful in describing who "won" and who "lost".

Yes, Gary Kremen did not prevail on anti-trust claims against ARIN.

But at the end of the day, Kremen will walk way with a substantial chunk of IPv4 address space.

The address dispute appeared to be over whether Kremen had to sign a contract with ARIN that was identical to what Kremen's predecessor (Cohen) had signed, or whether the agreement that Cohen had signed with ARIN would automagically shift from Cohen to Kremen.

To my mind that is a formality and I don't see why it had to be fought over in court - both sides seemed to agree that Cohen's terms applied to Kremen.

What I found interesting was the IP address treatment of "Block 2".  This is a chunk of space that was allocated in 1996 before ARIN came into existance and thus was outside of ARIN's control.

The court, sensibly, said that since it wasn't under ARIN's control, Block 2, couldn't be transferred in the context of a clarification between ARIN and Kremin.

But that leaves unanswered the question whether Kremen can no go to UUNET (or its successors) and have block 2 transferred there.

Which leaves me with a couple of observations and questions:

ARIN described its role in its filings as:

All U.S., Canadian and other IP resources (a portion of ARIN's geographical service area) are administered in a public trust by ARIN pursuant to a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. government. Because IP address space is finite and a public trust, IP resources are allocated to registrants subject to contractual terms and ARIN's policies. IP resources are allocated by ARIN pursuant to the terms of a services agreement, which obligates registrants to comply with ARIN's Internet Protocol address space allocation and assignment guidelines...IP resources may only be transferred from one entity to another pursuant to the terms of ARIN's Guidelines for Transferring Internet Protocol (IP) Space...and subject to ARIN's Transfer Policy...Among other things, the Guidelines provide that IP resources are non-transferable, may not be sold or assigned and may only be transferred upon ARIN's approval of a formal transfer request.

1. ARIN describes its role as if it were entire and complete across the US and Canadian allocations.  But from the decision, and ARIN's own statements, it is clear that there is IP address space in the US and Canada that is not under ARIN control.

2. From where did the authority come to establish the "public trust"?  The US government is neither monolithic nor empowered with unlimited authority.  In matters of delegation of authority it is necessary to ask with precision and specificity about the source of authority and how it was delegated.

To post comments, please login or create an account.

Related Blogs

Related News

Explore Topics

Dig Deeper

DNS Security

Sponsored by Afilias

IP Addressing

Sponsored by Avenue4 LLC

Mobile Internet

Sponsored by Afilias Mobile & Web Services

Cybersecurity

Sponsored by Verisign

Promoted Post

Buying or Selling IPv4 Addresses?

Watch this video to discover how ACCELR/8, a transformative trading platform developed by industry veterans Marc Lindsey and Janine Goodman, enables organizations to buy or sell IPv4 blocks as small as /20s. more»

Industry Updates – Sponsored Posts

Radix's .TECH, .STORE, .ONLINE and .FUN Get Approval from the Chinese Government

Join Neustar's Town Hall Meeting and Help Shape the Future Of .US

Avenue4 Helps IPv4 Sellers and Buyers Gain Market Access, Overcome Complexities

Introduction to ACCELR/8 - Fast Lane to the IPv4 Market

Avenue4 Launches ACCELR/8, Transforming the IPv4 Market with Automated Order-Driven Trading

Google Buys Business.Site Domain for 'Google My Business'

Radix Announces Global Web Design Contest, F3.space

Attacks Decrease by 23 Precent in 1st Quarter While Peak Attack Sizes Increase: DDoS Trends Report

5 Afilias Top Level Domains Now Licensed for Sale in China

Radix Announces Largest New gTLD Sale with Casino.Online

Verisign Releases Q4 2016 DDoS Trends Report: 167% Increase in Average Peak Attack from 2015 to 2016

Verisign Q3 2016 DDoS Trends Report: User Datagram Protocol (UDP) Flood Attacks Continue to Dominate

MarkMonitor Supports Brand Holders' Efforts Regarding .Feedback Registry

Don't Gamble With Your DNS

Defending Against Layer 7 DDoS Attacks

Understanding the Risks of the Dark Web

Radix Launches Startup League at TechCrunch

Celebrating One Year of .online

Verisign Releases Q2 2016 DDoS Trends Report - Layer 7 DDoS Attacks a Growing Trend

How Savvy DDoS Attackers Are Using DNSSEC Against Us