<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>CircleID: Cybersquatting</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Latest Cybersquatting related postings on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-12-04T09:46:00-08:00</dc:date>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Microsoft Files New Cybersquatting Lawsuit</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/microsoft_files_new_cybersquatting_lawsuit/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/microsoft_files_new_cybersquatting_lawsuit/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A Florida company has been charged with cybersquatting in a new lawsuit filed Wednesday. Twenty three domain names have been listed in the suit containing Microsoft's trademarks or misspellings of the names. The domain names which are registered to an entity called Domain Investments, include <em>windoesmobile.com</em>, <em>wwwhotmajl.com</em>, <em>microsoft-games.com</em> and <em>zunedrivers.com</em>. Many of the websites under the domains listed include advertising for various products and services. The suit is one of several typosquatting and cybersquatting suits filed by Microsoft. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/microsoft_files_new_cybersquatting_lawsuit/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-27T07:09:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>In Response to CADNA: Cybersquatting is Not Criminal But a Civil Matter</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081106_cybersquatting_not_criminal_but_civil/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081106_cybersquatting_not_criminal_but_civil/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse (CADNA) recently released a statement that implied that cybersquatting is a criminal activity. It said, "CADNA has been working diligently to further international and national policies that combat the practice of cybersquatting... As brands continue to learn about the prevalence and practice of online criminal activities..." While, Internet Commerce Association (ICA) vigorously opposes cybersquatting, it is important to note that cybersquatting is a civil matter, not a criminal one. There is a good reason that cybersquatting is a civil matter... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081106_cybersquatting_not_criminal_but_civil/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-06T15:44:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Expansion of Top&#45;Level Domain Names: Why Current Brand Protection Procedures Will Be Impractical</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081029_tld_expansion_brand_protection/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081029_tld_expansion_brand_protection/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As ICANN introduces new generic top level domains (gTLDs) and separates itself from US oversight, it has the opportunity to distance itself from the taint of cybersquatting, brand abuse, and criminal activity involving domains... To underscore the scope of the issue, consider this research on just 30 top Interbrand-ranked global brands. The most recent MarkMonitor Brandjacking Index found cybersquatting incidents increased over 40% in the last year for the brands that were studied; these leading brands suffered as many as 15,000 incidents <em>per brand</em>... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081029_tld_expansion_brand_protection/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-29T10:14:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Did Navigation Catalyst Systems Get Off Easy in Verizon&apos;s $100 Million Plus Lawsuit?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_navigation_catalyst_systems_verizon_lawsuit/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_navigation_catalyst_systems_verizon_lawsuit/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Navigation Catalyst Systems (NCS) has settled the well publicized cybersquatting lawsuit brought against it by Verizon. The terms of the settlement are simple and straight forward, amounting to little more than an agreement by NCS to no longer register domains similar to Verizon's trademarks again. No money was apparently paid by NCS as part of the resolution. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_navigation_catalyst_systems_verizon_lawsuit/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-28T12:10:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Continued Controversy Over Google Ads on Typosquatted Domains</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/controversy_google_ads_typosquatting/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/controversy_google_ads_typosquatting/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Regular readers of this site would be familiar with the ongoing legal battles involving the practice of typosquatting; the registration of misspelled domain names of well know brands with the intention of making a profit. Taking advantage of the fact that millions of online users mistype addresses of websites they intend to visit, typosquatters register common misspelled versions of popular sites and make money by displaying ads. Google's <a href="http://www.google.com/domainpark/">AdSense for Domains</a> (AFD) program, often used for displaying such ads, has been particularly targeted by trademark owners which according to McAfee's SiteAdvisor, serves ads on more than 80% of typosquatting sites recently uncovered. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/controversy_google_ads_typosquatting/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-14T11:53:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>How Can ICANN Improve Institutional Confidence?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081003_icann_improve_institutional_confidence/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081003_icann_improve_institutional_confidence/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This week ICANN held a public consultation in Washington, D.C., where ICANN's President's Strategy Committee (PSC) solicited remarks from a packed audience of intellectual property (IP) lawyers, domain name registrars and other Internet stakeholders on how the organization can improve institutional confidence. No surprise, ICANN's decision to add new generic top-level domains (gTLDs) to the Internet was on many participants' minds. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081003_icann_improve_institutional_confidence/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-03T08:50:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>law</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Recent Bank Merger Names Already Cybersquatted</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/bank_merger_names_cybersquatted/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/bank_merger_names_cybersquatted/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Domain names related to recent bank mergers are already being hoarded and sold online reports BBC News. "Domain names for the merged Bank of America/Merrill Lynch as well as for Lloyds TSB/HBOS have been snapped up. As reports of Lehman Brothers' intent to sell itself first surfaced last Friday, cybersquatters had already spotted Barclay's, HSBC and Bank of America as potential buyers... Accordingly, barclayslehman.com, hsbclehman.com, hsbclehmanbrothers.com and bofalehman.com had been acquired." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/bank_merger_names_cybersquatted/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-17T13:54:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>June Court Decision Detrimental to Domaining Practices</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88214_court_decision_detrimental_to_domaining/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88214_court_decision_detrimental_to_domaining/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In a June court ruling, domainer Navigation Catalyst and registrar Basic Fusion lost a cybersquatting lawsuit to Verizon... This is an extremely interesting and potentially precedent-setting case regarding domaining and domain name tasting. The court condemns both practices, leading to a preliminary injunction against the domainer and its registrar based on the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). As far as I can recall, this is the first time that a domainer has lost an ACPA lawsuit in court, and it provides an important data point confirming that domaining can be cybersquatting (a previously unresolved issue)... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88214_court_decision_detrimental_to_domaining/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-02T15:27:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Click Fraud, Botnets and Parked Domains &#45; All Inclusive</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87281_click_fraud_botnets_parked_domains/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87281_click_fraud_botnets_parked_domains/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It gets very ugly when someone owns both, the botnet, and the portfolio of parked domains actively participating in pay per click (PPC) advertising programs, where the junk content, or the typosquatted domain names are aiming to attract high value and expensive keywords in order for the scammer to earn higher on per click percentage. This is among the very latest tactics applied by those engaged in click fraud activites. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87281_click_fraud_botnets_parked_domains/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-28T10:30:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>CADNA Held London Online Brand Abuses and Internet Governance Education Forum</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/cadna_brand_abuses_internet_governance/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/cadna_brand_abuses_internet_governance/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse (CADNA) recently held its London Online Brand Abuses and Internet Governance Education Forum. The forum included companies from the US, UK, Belgium, Netherlands and Switzerland, with half of the attendees representing Global 500 companies. Forum attendees expressed concerns over issues such as online brand dilution and the often-ineffective governance of ICANN. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/cadna_brand_abuses_internet_governance/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-10T12:08:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>domain_names</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>New CIRA Whois Policy Strikes Balance Between Privacy and Access</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My weekly technology law column focuses this week on the new <a href="http://www.cira.ca/en/Whois/whois_intro.html">CIRA whois policy</a> that is scheduled to take effect on June 10, 2008. The whois issue has attracted little public attention, yet it has been the subject of heated debate within the domain name community for many years. It revolves around the whois database, a publicly accessible, searchable list of domain name registrant information (as in "who is" the registrant of a particular domain name). <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-02T09:54:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>privacy</category><category>spam</category><category>whois</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Brand Complementors: Implementing a Cooperative Domain&#45;Name Use</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/cooperative_domain_name_use/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/cooperative_domain_name_use/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The essay expands a <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/typosquatting_a_solution/">cooperative solution</a> to third-party use of brands in domain names. Like any approach that depends on cooperation, the solution will require both sides to change behavior but also allow both sides to take credit for the resulting benefits, i.e. a triangular solution. If not immediately addressed, the problem of third-party use can become a major threat to the industry. But we already know one thing: when it comes to this issue, legal action and bullying don't work. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/cooperative_domain_name_use/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-26T10:25:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>New Publication on Updating the Anti&#45;Cybersquatting Regime and Ad&#45;Based Cybersquatting</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/updating_anti_cybersquatting_regime/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/updating_anti_cybersquatting_regime/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<em>Sealing the cracks: a proposal to update the anti-cybersquatting regime to combat advertising-based cybersquatting</em> is the title of an article by Christopher Varas in the <a href="http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/3/4/246">April issue of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice</a>. In this article, the author labels "modern cybersquatting" the monetization of domain names through PPC advertisements, and says that brand owners lack effective tools to combat this practice... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/updating_anti_cybersquatting_regime/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-04T09:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>WIPO Reports Record Number of Domain Disputes in 2007</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/wipo_domain_disputes_2007/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/wipo_domain_disputes_2007/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[World Intellectual Property Organization (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Organization">WIPO</a>) has received 2,156 complaints alleging "abusive registration of trademarks on the Internet" in 2007, up 18 percent from 2006 and 48 percent more than the filings lodged in 2005. Most complaints came from the pharmaceutical, banking, telecommunications, retail and entertainment sectors. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/wipo_domain_disputes_2007/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-03-28T13:54:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ICA Posts Position Paper and Analysis of Snowe &quot;Anti&#45;Phishing&quot; Legislation</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/831125_ica_position_paper_anti_phishing_legislation/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/831125_ica_position_paper_anti_phishing_legislation/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Internet Commerce Association (<a href="http://www.internetcommerce.org/">ICA</a>) has posted a position paper and analysis of S. 2661, introduced on 2/25/08 in the US Senate. While we are firmly opposed to phishing and other criminal activities that may utilize domain names we are very concerned about the provisions of the proposal that appear to provide trademark owners with a means to avoid both UDRP and ACPA actions and alternatively bring private claims against domain names with a lower burden of proof and the potential for far higher monetary damages, without even requiring an allegation that the DN was in any way being utilized in a phishing scheme... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/831125_ica_position_paper_anti_phishing_legislation/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-03-01T13:14:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cybersquatting</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>law</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>privacy</category><category>security</category><category>whois</category>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>