<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>

	<title>CircleID</title>
	<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
	<description>Latest posts featured on CircleID</description>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
	<dc:date>2008-05-14T16:31:00-08:00</dc:date>

	


	<item>
		<title>White Space for Internet Use Interfering with Wireless Patient Devices?</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/95145_white_space_interfering_patient_devices/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/95145_white_space_interfering_patient_devices/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a germ of truth (perhaps a prion-sized germ or maybe just an amino acid) in the idea that transmitters in <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/13/business/NA-FIN-US-TV-vs-Internet-Medical-Devices.php">"white spaces" in the TV band *might* disrupt patient monitoring equipment</a> if designed by a lunatic who believes in sending massive pulses of energy in a whitespace in the TV band (perhaps amplified by a large parabolic dish antenna the size of a trashcan lid or larger, aimed at the patient monitor system. But that risk is completely shared with zillions of other potential radiators of energy in the entire electromagnetic spectrum... GE, of course, owns NBC. There is a MAJOR conflict of interest at the corporate level of GE... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/95145_white_space_interfering_patient_devices/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-14T16:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>wireless</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Do We Need Two Internets?</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/do_we_need_two_internets/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/do_we_need_two_internets/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan Zittrain's recent book, <em>The Future of the Internet -- And How to Stop It</em>, has spurred a lot of discussion both online and offline, with blog posts lauding his insights or criticising his over-apocalyptic imagination. The book itself makes fascinating reading for those who have watched the network grow from its roots in the research community into today's global channel for communications, commerce and cultural expression... One of the reasons that Zittrain puts forward for the growing popularity of closed or, as he prefers 'tethered', devices, is that they are less vulnerable to hacking, security flaws, malware and all the other perils that face any internet-enabled system. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/do_we_need_two_internets/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-14T13:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>cyberattack</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>mobile</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>security</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Spammers Handed Record $230 Million Anti&#45;Spam Judgment</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/spammers_fined_230_million/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/spammers_fined_230_million/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge in Los Angeles has awarded MySpace close to $230 million in its lawsuit against "Spam King" Sanford Wallace and his business partner Walter Rines. Judge Audrey B. Collins of United States District Court in the Central District of California ruled in MySpace's favor on Monday after the two men failed to show up in court, according to MySpace... While many spammers have been designated "Spam King," Wallace earned the title back in the late 1990s as a result of spam messages sent by his company Cyber Promotions. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/spammers_fined_230_million/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-14T12:52:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>law</category><category>spam</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>ICANN Preparing for Mass Introduction of Top&#45;Level Domains?</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_new_top_level_domains/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_new_top_level_domains/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[At the request of ICANN, <a href="http://hissa.nist.gov/~black/">Paul E. Black</a>, a computer scientist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (<a href="http://www.nist.gov/">NIST</a>) has developed an algorithm that may guide applicants in proposing new Top-Level Domains (TLDs). As new TLDs are added to the familiar .com, .info, and .net, the algorithm checks whether the newly proposed name is confusingly similar to existing ones by looking for visual likenesses in its appearance. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_new_top_level_domains/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-14T12:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>CEO&#8217;s Advised to Wake Up to Cyberthreats</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ceos_advised_cyberthreats/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ceos_advised_cyberthreats/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Twomey, chief executive of ICANN and member of the British-North American Committee, advises chief executives of the risks to business from cyber-espionage and how to deal with them... "There are reports of cyber-espionage against the US defense industry and the UK by China," said Twomey on Wednesday. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ceos_advised_cyberthreats/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-14T12:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>cyberattack</category><category>security</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Google Officially Announces Introduction of IPv6</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/851411_google_announces_ipv6/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/851411_google_announces_ipv6/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Google search is available over IPv6 at <a href="http://ipv6.google.com/">ipv6.google.com</a> (you'll need an IPv6 connection to view it)... From the official blog: "We hope that by allowing every computer and mobile device on the network to talk to each other directly -- an idea known as the "end-to-end principle" that was crucial to the original design of the Internet -- IPv6 will allow the continued growth of the Internet and enable new applications yet to be invented." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/851411_google_announces_ipv6/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-14T10:13:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>NATO Nations Sign Agreement on Cyber Defense Center</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/nato_nations_cyber_defense_center/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/nato_nations_cyber_defense_center/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven NATO nations gave their backing on Wednesday to a new cyber defense centre in Estonia, the ex-Soviet state which last year faced weeks of attacks on its Internet structure after a row with Russia. Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and Spain agreed to help fund and staff the centre in the Estonian capital Tallinn. The United States will initially send an observer to the project, aimed at boosting defenses against such attacks. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/nato_nations_cyber_defense_center/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-14T09:15:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>cyberattack</category><category>security</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Are Botnets Run by Spy Agencies?</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/botnets_spy_agencies/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/botnets_spy_agencies/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent story today about discussions for an <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/05/air-force-col-w.html">official defense Botnet</a> in the USA prompted me to post a question I've been asking for the last year. Are some of the world's botnets secretly run by intelligence agencies, and if not, why not? Some estimates suggest that up to 1/3 of PCs are secretly part of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/botnet">botnet</a>. The main use of botnets is sending spam, but they are also used for DDOS extortion attacks and presumably other nasty things like identity theft. But consider this... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/botnets_spy_agencies/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-13T09:58:01-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>cyberattack</category><category>privacy</category><category>security</category><category>spam</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Serious Gmail Flaw: Security Group Demonstrates Sending Unlimited Spam Using Google&#8217;s Own Servers</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85120_serious_gmail_flaw_security/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85120_serious_gmail_flaw_security/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers at Information Security Research Team (INSERT) have dissevered a serious flaw in Google's Gmail service. The group demonstrates how anyone with no special Internet access privileges other than being able to connect to SMTP (TCP port 25) and HTTP (TCP port 80) servers is able to exploit a single Gmail account in order to be granted nearly unrestricted access to Google's massive whitelisted SMTP relay infrastructure. Read more from the report... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85120_serious_gmail_flaw_security/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-12T08:51:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>security</category><category>spam</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Fees for .org Top&#45;Level Domain to Increase by 10%</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/fees_org_domain_increase/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/fees_org_domain_increase/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Public Interest Registry, the organization in charge of ".org" top-level domains, disclosed a planned fee increase in a May 1 <a href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/raad-to-twomey-01may08.pdf">letter to ICANN</a> [PDF]. The fee increase does not require the ICANN's approval. PIR did not cite a reason in its letter. Earlier this year, VeriSign Inc., the company in charge of managing ".com" and ".net," <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_price_jump_moores_law/">also announced</a> price increases. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/fees_org_domain_increase/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-11T10:27:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>The New Clearwire</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85107_the_new_clearwire/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85107_the_new_clearwire/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Clearwire could be game-changing, but the rules of the game may not be quite as Clearwire presents them. I have been wondering <a href="http://scrawford.net/blog/wimax-google-sprint-clearwire/968/">since last July</a> whether something significant would happen in the Google/Sprint world. The deal announcement earlier this weekseems to be that key development... In a nutshell, <a href="http://www.sprint.com/companyinfo/history/">Sprint</a> will contribute its substantial spectrum licenses in the 2.5 GHz range and its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX">WiMAX</a>-related assets and intellectual property. Google, Intel, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Bright House Networks will invest a total of $3.2 billion. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85107_the_new_clearwire/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-10T16:55:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>mobile</category><category>wireless</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>NGN is Not the Internet, and Never Will</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ngn_not_the_internet/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ngn_not_the_internet/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I see and hear a lot of confusion about next generation networks (NGN). In most cases people are using the term roughly as the <a href="http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com13/ngn2004/working_definition.html">ITU-T defines it</a>: "A Next Generation Network (NGN) is a packet-based network able to provide services including Telecommunication Services and able to make use of multiple broadband, QoS-enabled transport technologies and in which service-related functions are independent from underlying transport-related technologies." but many people don't realize how little this has to do with the Internet... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ngn_not_the_internet/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-10T06:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>IPv4 Shortage and Trading Concerns as Hot Marketable Goods</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[With IPv4 addresses in short supply, they could become increasingly interesting and marketable goods. This is a concern for Regional Internet Registries (RIR) that are in charge of managing IP address allocations. Heise Online reports: "If they officially permit transfers or sales in the future, they will be implicitly accepting commercialization and privatization. Any attempt to insist on the return of addresses to the RIRs could drive trading, which is probably inevitable, underground..." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-09T06:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>A Patent for SiteFinder&#45;Like Resolution</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw an interesting news item that broke Monday courtesy of DomainNameNews and SlashDot that hasn't been broadly covered yet. I'm surprised no one has posted on this yet on CircleID, so here goes. Apparently VeriSign has been awarded a patent for the resolution of mis-typed domain names. This was at the heart of the controversy back in 2003 around their SiteFinder Service. Amidst a storm of criticism ICANN insisted VeriSign shut down the service, and the company eventually agreed. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85760_verisign_patent_sitefinder_resolution/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-07T16:52:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Coders, Crackers and Bots, Oh My!</title>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/coders_crackers_bots/</guid>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/coders_crackers_bots/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There are more than just blue, black and white hat hackers. There are a few more types of folks out there that don't fit into the above categories. This article is taken from <a href="http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/cyberwarfare_101_black_hats_white_hats_crackers_and_bots">Stratfor</a> with some commentary by myself... Many of the hackers described in my <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/black_hats_white_hats_crackers_bots/">previous post</a> are also coders, or "writers," who create viruses, worms, Trojans, bot protocols and other destructive "malware" tools used by hackers... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/coders_crackers_bots/">More...</a>]]></description>
		<dc:date>2008-05-07T08:11:00-08:00</dc:date>
		<category>internet</category><category>security</category><category>spam</category>
	</item>


	</channel>
</rss>