CircleID

Comments

ISOC-NY Panel: The Future of WHOIS Policy (Webcast)

• Comment posted Nov 16, 2006 2:50 am PST — by Brandon CS Sanders
  At the last two ICANN meetings I've heard optimistic folks (including board members) suggesting that WHOIS would be resolved before the next ICANN.  Doesn't seem to have happened yet.  What was the sense among the panelists for how close to…

Consensus Polling: ALAC Shows the Way

• Comment posted Nov 14, 2006 11:43 pm PST — by Brandon CS Sanders
  ICANNWiki has posted the final ALAC self review document at ALAC:Self_Assessment_and_Next_Steps. We've also initiated the first test of Consensus Polling in the wider ICANN community.  Please feel warmly welcomed to join in to help coalesce consensus around the New gTLDs…

• Comment posted Nov 06, 2006 9:44 pm PST — by Brandon CS Sanders
  Sorry Dave, I meant to address my previous comment to you rather than to Dan. Karl, Everyone knows that you are not "in" to the current structure of ICANN.  I'm asking:  Are you and other ICANN curmudgeons in for a…

• Comment posted Nov 06, 2006 9:08 pm PST — by Brandon CS Sanders
  I’m not sure I can positively agree that “what works for ALAC will work for ICANN” Dan, Sorry for my delay in replying ... I've been on safari in Tanzania with my family during the last week. ALAC is a…

Is ICANN Producing Jewels?

• Comment posted Oct 27, 2006 7:59 am PDT — by Brandon CS Sanders
  Thanks for the validation Ted and John.  I just submitted the followup piece.  I hope the mining metaphor is not too dopey :-)

ALAC Meets the ICANN Board

• Comment posted Dec 07, 2005 12:55 am PST — by Brandon CS Sanders
  Wendy, I'm curious what sort of restructuring you propose?  It seems to me that what you need is a concrete proposal for the restructuring that has wide buyin across the constituencies of ICANN (both officially recognized and not).  Seems like…