CircleID

Comments

Sender ID: A Tale of Open Standards and Corporate Greed? - Part I

• Comment posted Sep 02, 2004 3:15 pm PDT — by Yakov Shafranovich
  Another possible use for SPF/Sender-ID is in cojunction with reputation systems.

Sender ID: A Tale of Open Standards and Corporate Greed? - Part II

• Comment posted Sep 09, 2004 2:17 am PDT — by Yakov Shafranovich
  Looks like Sender-ID has been basically killed in its current form according to a post from MARID chairs. More coverage at InternetNews.com and GrokLaw.

• Comment posted Sep 07, 2004 5:39 pm PDT — by Yakov Shafranovich
  As suspected, Microsoft's Harry Katz confirmed that the PRA algorithm itself is what the IPR claims are on. The rest of Sender-ID is unencumbered by IPR claims.

Why DomainKeys is Broken

• Comment posted Oct 27, 2004 2:03 pm PDT — by Yakov Shafranovich
  This doesn't mean that the essential concept of DomainKeys is broken, rather that more work is needed to account for problems like the one described here.

Sender-ID Back from the Dead

• Comment posted Oct 28, 2004 4:01 pm PDT — by Yakov Shafranovich
  Daniel, You might be underestimating the OSS community here specifically because of their large influence over the Internet infrastructure. Majority of so called "MTA vendors" are actually open source products: Exim, Postfix, Qmail and Sendmail, of which only one, Sendmail,…

AOL Fires Across the Bow of Spam-Friendly ISPs

• Comment posted Nov 01, 2004 12:01 pm PST — by Yakov Shafranovich
  AOl has been very progressive of all the ISPs for a long time, and a lot of the stuff they are doing is very good. For example, AOL's postmater wrote a document on port 25 blocking and it seems that…

2004: The Year That Promised Email Authentication

• Comment posted Jan 13, 2005 7:10 am PST — by Yakov Shafranovich
  As pointed out at GrumpOps, I forgot to mention that Mark Lentzer was also an author of SPF, not just Meng Wong. Sorry for the oversight.

Hijacking of Panix.com: A Call for An Emergency Rollback Procedure

• Comment posted Jan 18, 2005 4:45 am PST — by Yakov Shafranovich
  One point I want to mention: the current ICANN rules call for taking down a domain with invalid WHOIS information, presumely because the domain owner needs to be reachable. Perhaps in a similar vain, a minimum response time for registrars…

ICANN Approves New Domain for Adult Sites

• Comment posted Jun 02, 2005 10:10 pm PDT — by Yakov Shafranovich
  Now might be a good time to review RFC 3675, which was published here once before.

AOL and Goodmail: Two Steps Back for Email

• Comment posted Feb 02, 2006 10:43 pm PST — by Yakov Shafranovich
  Well, if anything this will actually provide us with a first real world test of e-postage.