Home / Blogs

Do Not Enter - It’s XXX

There soon will be a central place for Web surfers to dwell in a forbidden cyber land of adult fantasies, sex, dark rituals and total taboos. Finally, ICANN has given in to the pressure and has tossed a big rock across the turbulent e-commerce ocean. It has approved a new suffix, .xxx, for adult-only porn sites, creating ripples and debates in ever so confusing global cyber branding times when cyber global domain name challenges are being fought in the complex earthly trademark realities.

Three things are bound to happen.

Segregation and Polarization

The most profitable sector of the Internet is still adult Web sites. Though XXX offers a great branding opportunity to most adult sites, it still raises some serious questions and it demands some viewing strategies. Most sites will go through a frenzy to secure their already existing names with the new suffix, and also there will be a series of new names ending with .xxx. This suffix has a great appeal for adult content.

Most adult Web sites will use this new suffix while keeping all the other existing suffixes, including .com. This has happened each time a new suffix has been introduced, though it has fizzled down very quickly as the public at large has had no time to figure out the new suffixes, being as it is so overwhelmed with the commonality of the .com suffix.

Blocking and Access

For the first time, adult sites will have a visible and a clearly identifiable component to the very specific nature of the site, unlike .com, which is so general in nature. This would mean various search engines, portals and individuals would be able to sort and select by this suffix, to either allow or block such sites and e-mails. 

Monetizing and Marketing

This will bring added revenue and create some sparks for the registrars. The registration will become a money-making process of millions of new registrations, changes, modifications, squatting and legal disputes. The domain management industry will be humming for a while. In the coming days and beyond, once the dust settles down, there will be three key questions:

Enforcement? Is it possible that there will be a requirement by law to move all adult stuff to .xxx? This would require a more serious debate on the definition of what is an adult site, is it for selling guns, discussing philosophy, Alzheimer, sexual diseases, or just raw sex? If it is just raw sex, then why not introduce a new suffix of .sex? The issue of freedom of speech will be right at the center of the discussion, and there is no easy way for this to be legislated. It would become a Pandora’s box. 

Privacy? The exposure of the .xxx would take away users’ privacy as they might be reluctant to be seen with such a highly visible identity. Today most adult sites are nicely camouflaged into name brands like PersianKitty.com or BlueRiver.net, etc. The same names with .xxx will make it too obvious.

Squatters? Squatters and other players might find a moneymaking angle by creating embarrassment and exploiting legitimate business site names by registering them in the .xxx domain. This would be embarrassing to a legitimate business, which would have to explain that it has nothing to do with such a site, such as www.Disney.xxx, www.dell.xxx, www.lg.xxx or www.sony.xxx.

Only properly structured and clearly legit and globally strong trademark holders would be able to protect themselves; the rest with generic business names based on dictionary words, geographic names or general type surnames would have little protection. ICANN has always moved in a very unpredictable manner since inception, and randomly creating additional top level domain (TLD) suffixes doesn’t help. Each time a new category is added, it opens a wide debate.

Basically, a clear policy is needed on whether ICANN will open certain TLDs or not and under what situations. It can either work with only current suffixes and close the book, or have a system like the yellow pages. It could introduce suffixes for each industry, like hotels, airlines, libraries, marketing, real estate, doctors, and dentists, employed and unemployed, etc., adding some 5,000 such international categories.

Open to Anyone

Two problems. First, as long as there are no requirements for any proof or identification for a particular business or activity, anybody could use any suffix and simply jump into any category of choice. Second, searching would fail, as there will be no way to know who is whom. Under the present registration set up, this process of identity and control can’t be policed.

The cost of registration and domain name management would become a nightmare, as most would like to cover all the bases and have as many registrations in as many different suffixes as possible. The end user would be seriously frustrated to remember if it should type a hospital, doctor or medical suffix to find help.

By Naseem Javed, Expert: Global Naming Complexities, Corporate Nomenclature, Image & Branding

He is the founder of ABC Namebank, author of ‘Domination: The GTLD Name Game’, syndicated columnist, keynote speaker and specialist on global naming complexities.

Visit Page

Filed Under

Comments

Uma Murali  –  Jun 18, 2005 1:29 AM

Naseem,
Interesting article.

>The end user would be seriously frustrated to remember if it should type a hospital, doctor or medical suffix to find help.

These days, most end users depend on search engines like Google to find domain names.  Analysis of traffic to our own domain registrar site (http://www.namesbeyond.com) shows a large percentage of visits coming from Search Engines.

> First, as long as there are no requirements for any proof or identification for a particular business or activity, anybody could use any suffix and simply jump into any category of choice.

I had not read the .XXX ICANN application before, but after your post, I did go and read it.  The registry is saying they will perform serious proof and identification for adult-site activity.

Uma Murali
NamesBeyond.com

Jim L  –  Jun 21, 2005 6:21 PM

” The registry is saying they will perform serious proof and identification for adult-site activity.”

We have all heard that before - didn’t they promise that with .pro??

It’s all a mess - they should stop adding new suffixes and let the market absorb what is already out there in names.

Jim
www.choppers.com

Sebastian Ricciardi  –  Jun 22, 2005 6:42 PM

Dear Naseem,

I belevie that there is a confusion in granting privacy to pornography websites and allow them to “hide” into domains such as kitten.com or something similar. Privacy is a legitimate concern   that has strong support along the internet communitty. On the other hand, the practice of hiding in domain names that are confusing or induce mistrepresentations is one that can?t be supportted or protected, at least not as in privacy issues.

ICANN?s plans for .XXX does not incude enforcements. It?s simply out of ICANN?s scope to address such an issue. I do beleive that the creation of strong incentives by the registry side could granted the domain success, but that?s another discussion.

About your comments on trademarks, it might be logical to ask ourselves if a little ammendment to the UDRP would solve the kind of problems you accurately pointed out.

Sincerely,

Sebastian Ricciardi

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Related

Topics

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC