Home / Blogs

New gTLD Round 2 Update – Where Are We Really At?

Many industry onlookers and potential future applicants may be aware of the significant step the New gTLD Round 2 Program took recently when ICANN's policy body, the GNSO Council, unanimously approved the recommendations put forward in the final report from the community-led Subsequent Procedures Working Group and sent it to the ICANN Board for approval.

But what does that really mean?

Is it finally time for those interested in applying for a new gTLD to mobilize and get excited? Or should they continue to sit patiently whilst this near-decade-long process continues its snail-paced journey?

Here's an attempt to explain what this really means in 'non-policy' speak - and what you should be doing about it if you're thinking about applying in the second round of New gTLDs.

The Good News

Firstly, a situation such as this where the GNSO Council approves a report unanimously and sends it to the ICANN Board is a very significant step forward as it moves the process all the way to the final decision-makers.

Yes, it's true that the community-driven Subsequent Procedures Working Group took five years to finalize the report. And yes, it's also true to say that after all that time and hundreds of conference calls, there really wasn't a huge number of changes that were recommended in the report.

However, despite being relatively few in number, the proposed changes that were recommended were significant and absolutely needed to overcome some horrible situations and/or delays in the 2012 round.

Key changes that will impact future applicants from the report include the formalization of a specific process for .brand TLDs and a long overdue 'pre-approval' for backend operators to speed up technical testing and ensure that the review processes can be as quick as possible. More to come on that in another article soon.

Next, let's look at history.

Over my 14 years in the industry, I can't recall the GNSO unanimously approving things this quickly unless they are mission-critical or based upon a change of international law. Equally rare would be a situation where something like this would pass through without multiple revisions or iterations.

Given that this has taken ten years, it's reasonable to say the new gTLD program isn't mission-critical, so it's more likely that this swift approval represents a big tick for the consensus-driven content of the Working Group's report and for their efforts in meeting the needs of the individual constituencies along the way.

Personally, I think the unspoken element here is perception, and if I'm right, the GNSO deserves a big pat on the back.

When we in the community consider our collective role to the internet using public, it is embarrassing that it will be over ten years between rounds. The new recommendations that are being proposed to the Board will aim to ensure this never happens again by not only recommending that the ICANN Board formally agree to opening up future rounds after this next one, but also recommending that whenever the Board approve a round, they must also approve a timeline for the round subsequent.

So, with all of that said… has the same level of 'shopping the report around' been undertaken with the Board to facilitate another prompt approval, and similarly, does the Board share the embarrassment that I mention above and wish to minimize future delays?

Or will the Board take their time and deliberate over this for an extended period of time?

The Balancing Argument

It's important to remember that despite the GNSO's prompt approval, the Board's decision to approve the recommendations and open up the program is significantly more complex one.

Whereas the GNSO was simply agreeing to the policy, the Board needs to firstly consider a range of factors around when the program should go ahead, the price for an application, the suitability of auctions to handle contention in applications, and then consider all of the operational elements and financial allocations that a Board approval will trigger.

So, what does that mean in reality?

On the assumption that the Board approves the recommendations to open the second round, a number of high-level key elements need to be undertaken, including:

  • Directing the CEO to implement the program — including allocating the necessary resources
  • Generating a new Applicant Guidebook that implements the new recommendations
  • Updating the baseline Registry Agreement
  • Building the technical systems to support the application process (the Round 1 systems are end of life)
  • Engaging the necessary third-party dispute resolution organizations
  • Building a communications program

Each of these has been done before in some way, so it's reasonable to assume that things should move with some level of speed. But there are many elements to the steps described above, and it's reasonable to assume this could take 12 months or so to implement.

Did this wake up the naysayers?

Outside of this Board approval process is the 'hidden' challenges that exist in this multi-stakeholder community and plagued the first round.

For those with good memories, you may recall the numerous last-minute delays that happened in the first round that were caused by all sorts of scaremongering and 'fake news' campaigns that took years to resolve and dampened the appetites of many possible applicants in the process. Rest assured, these groups still exist, and it will be interesting to see their tactics as they appear from the woodwork after this recent announcement.

Put simply, the ICANN Board needs to demonstrate a much higher level of strength this time around and avoid allowing those with commercial interests that are not aligned with the new gTLD Program to derail the process. It's vital that ICANN restore its integrity and regain much of the respect lost as a result of the 2012 program in this next round through a consistent application process and a predictable review period for applicants.

What's next?

The ICANN Board will begin to consume the 400-page report over the coming weeks and involve the community as necessary through Public Comment processes.

But when will they actually approve it? For now, that's anyone's guess, but you can rest assured we're talking more like months than weeks.

For future applicants, it seems like now might be a good time to start the internal conversations on the feasibility of a new gTLD for your organization and we're certainly starting to see more folks come to us and ask them to help them on that journey over the last few months.

We generally advise folks on an 18-24 month preparation prior to submitting their application — with the longer times generally recommended for governments, or large international companies with a complex approval process.

In our next series of blog posts, we'll outline for you how to kickstart your internal preparations, but for now, the second round has moved forward in a major way, so it's exciting to start sharing this with the community.

For more information about how GoDaddy Registry can help your organisation with an application for a top-level domain in the next round, email [email protected] or visit www.registry.godaddy.

By Tony Kirsch, Head of Professional Services at GoDaddy Registry

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet


 Be the first to post a comment!

Add Your Comments

 To post your comments, please login or create an account.



Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Domain Management

Sponsored byMarkMonitor

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppdetex

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPXO

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign


Sponsored byVerisign