Home / Blogs

Latin American and Caribbean TLD Association Politely Smacks ICANN Over Meeting Relocation

Earlier this week the Latin American and Caribbean TLD Association (LACTLD) put out a statement about ICANN meetings.

The statement, which is available in both Spanish and English, while very polite and diplomatic, expresses the organisation’s concerns with ICANN moving meetings out of Latin America due to health concerns.

So far this year the meeting scheduled for Panama (ICANN 56) has been relocated to Helsinki. ICANN 57 is currently scheduled to be held in San Juan, but there have been serious doubts raised as to whether it is viable for the organisation to hold a meeting there. While no firm decision has been taken by ICANN on the location of ICANN 57, there is a fairly strong chance that it will be relocated, possibly to Las Vegas, or another city outside the region.

From LACTLD’s perspective, they don’t see why ICANN should relocate the meetings. They state that the threat of Zika hasn’t impacted activities in the region, while moving the meeting, would impact participants from the region. They go on to note that disruption to the planned schedule of ICANN meetings will also have a negative impact on LACTLD’s planned events.

Whether you agree with them or not, they do raise some interesting points around how ICANN decides to move a meeting (or not):

“We also share the concern for the health and safety of all participants in the events scheduled in our region. Notwithstanding that, we consider appropriate for ICANN to do a permanent reassessment of the conditions justifying possible future suspension of other meetings, such as the necessary consultation to all potential affected by such decisions.”

I was involved (to a degree) in the organisation and hosting of the ICANN meeting in Dublin last year and it is a big operation (just look at some of the logistics involved). What is causing headaches for a lot of people is a nasty combination of timing and politics. ICANN as an organisation wants to maintain its custom of rotating meetings across the various regions, but has had to move several meetings in the past due to a variety of health concerns and conflicts. The Marrakech meeting, for example, was postponed by a year. The meeting planned for Jordan (ICANN 41) was relocated to Singapore. Switching location isn’t a decision to be taken lightly, but if the longer they leave things without taking that decision the nastier the overall impact of changes will be on all parties concerned.

By Michele Neylon, MD of Blacknight Solutions

Filed Under

Comments

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Related

Topics

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global