Home / Blogs

Is it Time for a Registration Operations Industry Association? (Part 1)

Since 2001 there have been occasional conversations on technical mailing lists exploring the concept of creating an independent industry association or consortium of domain registration operators. My recent experiences with the evolution of extensions to the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) have convinced me to look at these suggestions more closely, and I’m now convinced that this is an idea worth exploring.

“Registration Operations” refers to the technical tasks, such as the development, deployment, and ongoing systems administration of EPP, performed by registries and registrars to provide registration services. While EPP is used to provide domain name registration and management services, registration operations also include the tasks performed by Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) to provide address registration and systems administration services.

While there is no shortage of dialogue on the policy aspects of registering domain names, there is no forum for the discussion of the technical aspects of registering and managing domain names using EPP. The Internet Engineering Task Force’s (IETF’s) Provisioning Registry Protocol (provreg) working group completed its work and was closed in April 2004. The current Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensions (eppext) working group was chartered to develop procedures for the registration of protocol extensions, but the more general concept of registration operations is out of scope. In the meantime a need has been identified to coordinate the technical aspects of the development and deployment of EPP extensions and there’s no forum in which operators are currently discussing this and other operational matters. Add in the impending publication of IETF standards for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP, a potential WHOIS replacement) and there will be additional needs for technical coordination of our deployment and operational efforts.

Over the last few months I’ve been talking to many different gTLD and ccTLD registry and registrar representatives to see if there’s interest in the topic of developing a forum to discuss technical coordination. I’ve learned that there is a lot of support for the concept, measured with some concern for adding expensive meeting and travel commitments beyond those we all already have. Is it time to put some real effort into finding a way to get these conversations going? I think it is, and I’ll lay out some possible ways to accomplish this task in a future blog post.

By Scott Hollenbeck, Fellow at Verisign

Filed Under

Comments

Comment Title:

  Notify me of follow-up comments

We encourage you to post comments and engage in discussions that advance this post through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can report it using the link at the end of each comment. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of CircleID. For more information on our comment policy, see Codes of Conduct.

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

VINTON CERF
Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet

Related

Topics

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Cybersecurity

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byCSC

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPv4.Global

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

New TLDs

Sponsored byRadix

DNS

Sponsored byDNIB.com