Home / Blogs

Singular and Plural TLDs: A Rather Strange Decision

ICANN stated recently that it will allow similar (i.e. singular and plural) versions of the same string to co-exist for new Top-Level Domains (TLDs). This surprising decision immediately begs the question:

"Will ICANN give holders of a string first refusal on the (singular or plural) version that they do not already hold during the next round of applications where only one version (singular or plural) of a string has been awarded?"

ICANN would be well-advised to answer this question very swiftly — and to do so in the affirmative. In so doing, ICANN would ensure the fair treatment of those who demonstrated their trust in it by acting first and taking all the associated risks.

By Jean Guillon, New gTLDs "only".

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet


Really? By John Levine  –  Jul 10, 2013 12:22 pm PDT

Do you think the applicant for DUNS should automatically have DUN, and the applicant for BLUE should automatically have BLUES?

First come first served in Round 2? By Jean Guillon  –  Jul 11, 2013 10:03 am PDT

Not automatically but first applicant should have his word to say.

I already imagine a second round following a "first come first served" rule…

JeanWhile I agree that the decision is By Michele Neylon  –  Jul 10, 2013 12:27 pm PDT


While I agree that the decision is a bit strange, I'm not sure I follow what you're asking them to do.

And I also think that looking at this from the perspective of an applicant / registry operator is fundamentally flawed.

Any issues around singulars vs plurals should be looked at from the perspective of a prospective registrant (or even a registrar)


How about ... By John Levine  –  Jul 10, 2013 12:29 pm PDT

Looking at them from the point of view of the poor users who are expected to make sense of all these names, rather than the handful of people who want to profit from them?

JohnExactly.And I would include "registrars" in there, By Michele Neylon  –  Jul 10, 2013 12:33 pm PDT

And I would include "registrars" in there, as I honestly can't see how on earth my staff would be able to understand the difference between two strings like that. And if they can't understand them then I can just see headaches :)


Registrants = I agree By Jean Guillon  –  Jul 11, 2013 9:57 am PDT

I think this question is crucial for round 2 and it should be discussed.
Decision about singulars and plurals should certainly not have been taken recently but written black on white in the applicant guidebook.

One question here: why would Registrars have their word to say here?

Add Your Comments

 To post your comments, please login or create an account.




Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppdetex

Domain Management

Sponsored byMarkMonitor

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPXO

Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API