Home / Blogs

ICANN Releases New gTLD Applicant Guidebook …Would Apple Need Permission from China for .MAC?

The much-anticipated New gTLD Draft Application Guidebook is out!

ICANN has released Version 3. Lots of changes, some minor, some large. All worth reading if you're a potential applicant or just interested in the promise of new Top-Level Domains (TLDs).

The public comment period clock started October 4, and runs until November 22 of this year.

I am still digesting the many volumes of changes but caught this one for example in Module 2 at (p. 14):

A string shall be considered to be a country or territory name if: (i) it is an alpha-3 code listed in the ISO 3166-1 standard

This means .GEO would have to get a letter of non-objection from the government of Georgia.

It also means that Apple would need a signature from the Chinese government or relevant authority in Macao to apply for .MAC.

An applied-for gTLD string that falls into any the above categories is considered to represent a geographical name. In the event of any doubt, it is in the applicant's interest to consult with relevant governments and public authorities and enlist their support or non-objection prior to submission of the application, in order to preclude possible objections and pre-address any ambiguities concerning the string and applicable requirements.

Congratulations, Apple!

By Jothan Frakes, Domain Name Industry Consultant

CircleID Newsletter The Weekly Wrap

More and more professionals are choosing to publish critical posts on CircleID from all corners of the Internet industry. If you find it hard to keep up daily, consider subscribing to our weekly digest. We will provide you a convenient summary report once a week sent directly to your inbox. It's a quick and easy read.

I make a point of reading CircleID. There is no getting around the utility of knowing what thoughtful people are thinking and saying about our industry.

Co-designer of the TCP/IP Protocols & the Architecture of the Internet


Don't forget about Estee Lauder By Antony Van Couvering  –  Oct 05, 2009 3:42 pm PDT

Estee Lauder has a very successful line of cosmetics called "Mac."

Caterpillar and HP are not so fortunate By Paul Tattersfield  –  Oct 05, 2009 3:57 pm PDT

Caterpillar and HP are not so fortunate as to be able to ask the Chinese Government for a letter of approval.

@Tattersfield Clarifying... By Jothan Frakes  –  Oct 05, 2009 5:37 pm PDT

Caterpillar and HP are not so fortunate as to be able to ask the Chinese Government for a letter of approval.

Assuming Apple might consider filing for .MAC, I'd not intended to trivialize the application into simply requesting the approval from the Chinese government; rather I was identifying that they have an additional hurdle to leap were they to apply for it.

Antony identified above that Estee Lauder has a line called "Mac", and I can think of a place with a big yellow M logo (if that wasn't clear, think hamburger) as a wider list of people with opportunity to request the string themselves, and/or object to an application.

I was told Caterpiller actually was consulted by PuntCat for them to identify non-significance prior to doing the .CAT Top Level Domain 5 years ago during the purely sponsored round.

Additionally, Hewlett-Packard has some additional hurdles to leap to obtain .HP because two character combinations are reserved for the potential use as country codes against the 2 char ISO3166-1 and their 'exceptionally reserved' codes.

Add Your Comments

 To post your comments, please login or create an account.



Domain Names

Sponsored byVerisign

Brand Protection

Sponsored byAppdetex


Sponsored byVerisign

IPv4 Markets

Sponsored byIPXO

Threat Intelligence

Sponsored byWhoisXML API

Domain Management

Sponsored byMarkMonitor