<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>CircleID: Regional Registries</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Latest Regional Registries related postings on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-12-04T12:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Which Region is Taking the Lead in IPv6 Deployment?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/2008929_region_leading_ipv6_deployment/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/2008929_region_leading_ipv6_deployment/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[IPv6 is in the news because the mainstream media have started to pick up the fact that IPv4 will be fully allocated in the next two or three years. And IPv6 deployment is important if we want to keep the Internet growing sustainably. So where is IPv6 deployment most evident? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/2008929_region_leading_ipv6_deployment/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-29T10:35:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>The McCain Campaign&apos;s &quot;Technology&quot; Message</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88178_mccain_campaign_technology_message/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88178_mccain_campaign_technology_message/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I look at this as the ideas of Mike Powell and Meg Whitman, and a lot of unimportant wordsmithing. Before the Dublin (Erie) IETF I wrote one for one of the top three DCCC targeted races. You, or One, or I (isn't voice fun) tries for ideas that matter, and then try to connect the dots, for the semi-literate staff of a candidate who needs clue, e.g., to make effective calls to the DNC's major contributor lists for area codes 415, 408, 650 and 831. I mention Dublin because ages ago Scott Bradner's plan for Harvard, decent bandwidth everywhere and location transparency was, in just a few pages, a revolutionary policy document then, and now, and I was happy to see Scott again and let him know that two decades later I still remembered seeing policy stated with confidence and clarity. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88178_mccain_campaign_technology_message/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-17T20:33:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Manufacturers Urged to Upgrade Routers, Network Management Software Before End of Year</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/upgrade_routers_network_management_software_as/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/upgrade_routers_network_management_software_as/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Regional Internet Registries (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_Internet_Registry">RIRs</a>) have warned that routers and network management software should be upgraded ahead of the increased distribution of four-byte (also known as 32-bit) Autonomous System (AS) numbers. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/members/602/">Geoff Huston</a>, Chief Scientist at Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (<a href="http://www.apnic.net">APNIC</a> - Asia and the Pacific region RIR), expressed severe concerns over failure to prepare for four-byte AS numbers... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/upgrade_routers_network_management_software_as/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-28T12:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Is It Time to Create a Market for IPv4 Addresses?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/is_it_time_market_ipv4_addresses/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/is_it_time_market_ipv4_addresses/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's fascinating to watch the Internet technical community grapple with policy economics as they face the problems creating by the growing scarcity of IPv4 addresses. The Internet Governance Project (IGP) is analyzing the innovative policies that <a href="http://www.arin.net">ARIN</a>, <a href="http://www.ripe.net">RIPE</a> and <a href="http://www.apnic.net">APNIC</a> are considering as a response to the depletion of IPv4 addresses. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/is_it_time_market_ipv4_addresses/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-13T20:54:01-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>No Fines for Comcast</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87113_no_fines_for_comcast/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87113_no_fines_for_comcast/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Note: this is an update on my earlier story, which incorrectly said that the AP reported that Chairman Martin was seeking to impose "fines" on Comcast. In fact, the story used the word "punish" rather than "fine," and a headline writer at the New York Times added "penalty" to it <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/technology/11fcc.html">"F.C.C. Chairman Favors Penalty on Comcast"</a> (I won't quote the story because I'm a blogger and the AP is the AP, so click through.) Much of the initial reaction to the story was obviously colored by the headline. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87113_no_fines_for_comcast/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-12T14:50:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>law</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Regional Internet Registries Appeal for IPv6 Investment at OECD Conference</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86179_rir_appeal_ipv6_investment_oecd/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86179_rir_appeal_ipv6_investment_oecd/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ministers from more than 40 countries are discussing the future of Internet economy at <a href="http://www.oecd.org/FutureInternet">OECD meeting</a> in Seol, Korea, 17-18 Jun. Discussions include security, competition, and strengthening the role of the Internet economy in enhancing social and economic development as well as agreement on new ways to improve global co-ordination and co-operation. The Number Resource Organization (<a href="http://www.nro.net/">NRO</a>) today issued an appeal for investment in IPv6 infrastructure. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86179_rir_appeal_ipv6_investment_oecd/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-17T21:32:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>IPv6 and Airline Tickets&#8230; Tales of Two Transitions</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86270_ipv6_and_airline_tickets/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86270_ipv6_and_airline_tickets/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The internet bus continues to accelerate straight into the IPv4 address depletion wall with spirited discussions continuing on how to divvy up the remnants of the address space. Obviously all five Regional Internet Registries (RIR's) want to make sure they get their fair share from IANA but what is a fair share remains the subject of interpretation. In the mean time, scenarios of a speculative land rush and auctions of ever smaller address blocks abound with unattractive consequences such as an explosion of the size of the routing table and a stunted growth of the global internet economy... In the meantime, the airline industry completed a rather significant migration of their own... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86270_ipv6_and_airline_tickets/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-02T18:25:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>IPv4 Shortage and Trading Concerns as Hot Marketable Goods</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[With IPv4 addresses in short supply, they could become increasingly interesting and marketable goods. This is a concern for Regional Internet Registries (RIR) that are in charge of managing IP address allocations. Heise Online reports: "If they officially permit transfers or sales in the future, they will be implicitly accepting commercialization and privatization. Any attempt to insist on the return of addresses to the RIRs could drive trading, which is probably inevitable, underground..." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv4_shortage_trading_hot_goods/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-09T06:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>CAIDA and ARIN Release IPv6 Survey</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84136_caida_arin_ipv6_survey/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84136_caida_arin_ipv6_survey/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA) and the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) presented the <a href="http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XXI/PDF/monday/IPv6_Survey_KC.pdf">results</a> [PDF] of a recent IPv6 survey at the ARIN XXI Public Policy Meeting in Denver on April 7th. The survey involved over 200 respondents from a blend of Government, commercial organizations (including ISPs and end users), educational institutions, associations, and other profit and non-profit entities. The purpose of the survey, conducted between March 10th and 24th, was to capture IPv6 penetration data in the ARIN region... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84136_caida_arin_ipv6_survey/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-13T18:33:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Domain Name Price Jump: Moore&apos;s Law or Parkinson&apos;s Laws?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_price_jump_moores_law/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_price_jump_moores_law/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As expected, <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2008/03/24/daily57.html">VeriSign raised the price of domain names</a>, effective in October. New prices wholesale prices (to the registrar) for .com domain names are going from $6.42 to $6.86, while .net will increase from $3.85 to $4.23. This news came a few days ago in a <a href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/registries/big-shocker-verisign-raises-prices-again/1492">letter to registrars</a>. (Hint to consumers: renew your domains now.) ...So, basically, many if not most of VeriSign's registry costs have been falling at an exponential rate. Hard disk storage, computing performance, bandwidth, RAM storage... yet the cost is going up. How is this justified? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_price_jump_moores_law/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-03T09:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>dnssec</category><category>domain_names</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>regional_registries</category><category>security</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>IPv6 Deployment: Just Where Are We?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_deployment_where_are_we/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_deployment_where_are_we/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this article we'd like to look at some measures of the use of IPv4 and IPv6 protocols in today's Internet and see if we can draw any conclusions about just how far down the track we are with the IPv6 part of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#Dual_stack">dual stack</a> deployment. We'll use a number of measurements that have been made consistently since 1 January 2004 to the present, where we can distinguish between the relative levels of IPv4 and IPv6 use in various ways. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_deployment_where_are_we/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-03-31T08:42:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>IPv6&#8230; A Pre&#45;Game Show in Denver and Featured at the Geneva Auto Show</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/832911_ipv6_denver_geneva_auto_show/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/832911_ipv6_denver_geneva_auto_show/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We saw it in San Jose, then in Taipei and in Philadelphia and now it is about to happen in Denver Colorado! Yes, the IPv6 hour is about to occur a fourth and even a fifth time! The <a href="http://www.arin.net/ARIN-XXI/v6_pregame.html">upcoming ARIN XXI</a> will have a pre-game and a main event IPv6 hour with technical staff to assist the neophytes on their first dive into the IPv6 only world... In the meantime in the Geneva Auto show, impact of IPv6 on ITS (Intelligent Transport Systems/Services) was a topic on its own with a revealing and well timed presentation by Thierry Ernst of Inria, the French Institute of Research in Informatics and Automation. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/832911_ipv6_denver_geneva_auto_show/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-03-29T11:13:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>IPv6 in Slovak Academic Network</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_in_slovak_academic_network/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_in_slovak_academic_network/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The main reason for developing a new internet protocol was based on lack of address; however this was not the only reason. Unfortunately, many people think of IPv6 only as enormous address space, but there are a lot of other advantages, for example... authorizations and authentication function are implemented directly in the protocol and are mandatory... automatic configuration of network interfaces based on their physical address... protocol itself recognizes data streams which must be transmitted in real time, and the data must be processed with highest priority... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_in_slovak_academic_network/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-02-29T14:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>RIPE NCC Publishes Case Study of youtube.com Hijack</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/822811_ripe_ncc_case_study_youtube_hijack/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/822811_ripe_ncc_case_study_youtube_hijack/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As you may be aware from recent news reports, traffic to the youtube.com website was 'hijacked' on a global scale on Sunday, 24 February 2008. The incident was a result of the unauthorised announcement of the prefix 208.65.153.0/24 and caused the popular video sharing website to become unreachable from most, if not all, of the Internet. The RIPE NCC conducted an analysis into how this incident was seen and tracked by the RIPE NCC's Routing Information Service (RIS) and has published a case study... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/822811_ripe_ncc_case_study_youtube_hijack/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-02-28T10:52:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>regional_registries</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comments on an IP Address Trading Market</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/82159_ip_address_trading_market/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/82159_ip_address_trading_market/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[With IPv4 addresses becoming scarcer, there has been talk that a trading market will develop. The idea is that those holding addresses they do not really need will sell them for a profit. More alarming is that there have been a few <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/021308-ipv6-delay.html">articles</a> about how the Regional Internet Registries (RIR) are contemplating creating such a market so that they can regulate it, conceding that it will happen anyway and taking the "if you can't be 'em, join 'em" attitude. This is all a bit disturbing. Maybe I'm naïve, but it's a little unclear to me how an unsanctioned trading market could really operate without the RIRs at least being aware... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/82159_ip_address_trading_market/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-02-15T09:38:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category><category>spam</category>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>