<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>CircleID: Policy &amp; Regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Latest Policy & Regulation related postings on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-12-04T14:13:00-08:00</dc:date>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Fiber to the Home: Ideal Economic Stimulus?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081204_fiber_home_ideal_economic_stimulus/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081204_fiber_home_ideal_economic_stimulus/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This week, the headlines seem to be full of fresh doom and gloom for wireline carriers, who employ people in every congressional district across America. Sooner or later, someone is going to call for Congress to tap some of the hundreds of billions in 2009 economic stimulus to help the LECs through troubled times, save lots of jobs, and preserve the way we do business in our critical last-mile communications infrastructure. Is this wise? Is there a better way? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081204_fiber_home_ideal_economic_stimulus/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-04T09:46:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>No Ifs, Ands or Butts, the New FCC Must Focus on Neutrality</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081203_no_ifs_ands_butts_fcc_neutrality/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081203_no_ifs_ands_butts_fcc_neutrality/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Denver Post today urged a new FCC to get its mind off of "buttocks" and onto more serious issues like Net Neutrality. The editorial board was referring to a case now before the U.S. Court of Appeals, in which the agency's top legal minds are trying to determine the appropriate definition for the human posterior to better guide efforts to fine ABC for a few errant cheeks featured on a 2003 episode of NYPD Blue. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081203_no_ifs_ands_butts_fcc_neutrality/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-03T16:11:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Lessons From the Hawaii Telcom Bankruptcy</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081202_lessons_from_hawaii_telcom_bankruptcy/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081202_lessons_from_hawaii_telcom_bankruptcy/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hawaii Telcom, the incumbent local exchange telephone company, has filed for bankruptcy protection. Press accounts attribute this outcome to increased competition, the company's struggle to finance capital spending while making debt payments, a significant downturn in the economy, as well as the difficulties in the transition following the leveraged buyout of the company from Verizon Communications Inc. I have a few other bogus and credible explanations that may offer greater insights. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081202_lessons_from_hawaii_telcom_bankruptcy/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-02T08:09:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Free, Slow, Censored Internet: A Bad Idea</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_free_slow_censored_internet_bad_idea/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_free_slow_censored_internet_bad_idea/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The FCC is looking for an organization to provide free, slow, and censored Internet access. The censorship apparently would include email as well as websites. According to an article in today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em>: "Outgoing Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin is pushing for action in December on a plan to offer free, pornography-free wireless Internet service to all Americans, despite objections from the wireless industry and some consumer groups [nb. and from me]... The winning bidder would be required to set aside a quarter of the airwaves for a free Internet service [nb. the WSJ hasn't got that part quite right]." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_free_slow_censored_internet_bad_idea/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-01T13:18:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>censorship</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>wireless</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>The Web&apos;s Benevolent Dictators</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_the_webs_benevolent_dictators/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_the_webs_benevolent_dictators/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Rosen has a great article in the <em>New York Times Magazine</em> this weekend titled Google's Gatekeepers. In it he deals with the question of whether we are becoming too overly dependent on a few big web companies like Google &ndash; and whether it's wise over the long run for us to trust their team of (currently) very nice, well-meaning people who are trying hard to do the right thing when faced with government censorship demands and surveillance pressures. He writes... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_the_webs_benevolent_dictators/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-01T11:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>privacy</category><category>web</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>FCC Pushing for Free Internet Plan, Called Most Controversial Issue in December</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_pushing_for_free_internet/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_pushing_for_free_internet/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Outgoing Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin is pushing for action in December on a plan to offer free, pornography-free wireless Internet service to all Americans, despite objections from the wireless industry and some consumer groups. The proposal to allow a no-smut, free wireless Internet service is part of a proposal to auction off a chunk of airwaves. The winning bidder would be required to set aside a quarter of the airwaves for a free Internet service. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_pushing_for_free_internet/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-01T10:16:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>wireless</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>The FCC White Space Regulations: Pretty Good at First Look</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081126_fcc_white_space_regulations/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081126_fcc_white_space_regulations/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My prediction is that LTE and WiMAX are toast. The new great thing will be WRANs (wireless regional area networks). WRAN's will extend and eventually subsume WiFi. The detailed regulations which implement the FCC decision to free the spectrum formerly known as TV white spaces have now been released. They look pretty good from the point of view of someone who believes the unlicensed use of this spectrum has the potential to make a huge difference in the way the world communicates. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081126_fcc_white_space_regulations/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-26T13:33:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>broadband</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>wireless</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>How Fast is Internet Traffic Growing?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081125_how_fast_internet_traffic_growing/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081125_how_fast_internet_traffic_growing/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It depends on whose numbers you like. Andrew Odlyzko claims it's up 50-60% over last year, a slower rate of growth than we've seen in recent years. Odlyzko's method is flawed, however, as he only looks at public data, and there is good reason to believed that more and more traffic is moving off the public Internet and its public exchange points to private peering centers. Nemertes collects at least some data on private exchanges and claims a growth rate somewhere between 50-100%. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081125_how_fast_internet_traffic_growing/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-25T15:26:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Canadian Report Tells ISPs to Deal with Hate Sites</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081125_canadian_isps_to_deal_with_hate_sites/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081125_canadian_isps_to_deal_with_hate_sites/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A report calling for reforms to Canada's Human Rights Commission is calling for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to form their own monitoring body to more speedily deal with hate material hosted on their servers. The report calls for the Human Rights Act to be amended to remove provisions that have the government body censor hate speech, while at the same time calling for ISPs to invoke their terms of service to knock down hate websites. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081125_canadian_isps_to_deal_with_hate_sites/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-25T09:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Phishers Expand Number of Top Level Domains Abused, Policy Changes Found Effective in Prevention</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/phishers_expand_top_level_domains_abused/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/phishers_expand_top_level_domains_abused/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The new Global Phishing Survey released by the Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG) this month reveals that phishing gangs are concentrating their efforts within specific top level domains (TLDs), but also that anti-phishing policies and mitigation programs by domain name registrars and registries can have a significant and positive effect. The number of TLDs abused by phishers for their attacks expanded 7 percent from 145 in H2/2007 to 155 in H1/2008. The proportion of Internet-protocol (IP) number-based phishing sites decreased 35 percent in that same period, declining from 18 percent in the second half of 2007 to 13 percent in the first half of 2008. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/phishers_expand_top_level_domains_abused/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-24T08:35:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>security</category><category>spam</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>NTIA Seeks Nominations to Serve on the Online Safety and Technology Working Group</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081122_ntia_nominations_online_safetty/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081122_ntia_nominations_online_safetty/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the midst of the election season, Congress passed a plethora of Internet related laws. Most involved child protection. One involved webcaster protection. Wasting no time, the impact of the new laws is already being felt through federal agency implementation. On Friday, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) in the Department of Commerce released the following notice... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081122_ntia_nominations_online_safetty/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-22T13:23:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>censorship</category><category>law</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>CRTC Denies CAIP Application on Throttling, But Sets Net Neutrality Hearing</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081120_crtc_denies_throttling_net_neutrality/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081120_crtc_denies_throttling_net_neutrality/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This morning, the CRTC issued its much-anticipated ruling in the CAIP v. Bell case, the first major case to test the legality of Internet throttling. The Commission denied CAIP's application, ruling that Bell treated all of its customers (retail and wholesale) in the same throttled manner. This points to the challenge in this case -- it was not about discriminatory network practices per se, but rather about wholesale shaping in a specific context. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081120_crtc_denies_throttling_net_neutrality/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-20T13:26:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Canada&apos;s CRTC Sides with Bell on Internet &quot;Throttling&quot; Case, Regulating Traffic Flow OK</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/crtc_bell_internet_throttling/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/crtc_bell_internet_throttling/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Canada's telecoms watchdog has sided with Bell Canada Enterprises (BCE) in letting the company slow down certain file-sharing traffic on wholesale networks it leases to smaller, independent service providers. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) said today that BCE's main telecom unit, Bell Canada, can continue to "shape" traffic on the leased networks, but will now have to notify wholesale customers at least 30 days in advance of making performance-affecting changes. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/crtc_bell_internet_throttling/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-20T13:18:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Will Work for Bandwidth</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081119_will_work_for_bandwidth/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081119_will_work_for_bandwidth/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Internet is in for interesting times. Previously, on Renysys' blog I wrote about the engineering issues and the policy issues facing us over the next five years. But there is at least one large issue still lurking. Most of you will not be surprised to learn that almost all of these issues are outgrowths of a single factor: money. The core of the Internet still doesn't have a sustainable business model. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081119_will_work_for_bandwidth/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-20T07:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Google&apos;s Chief Suggests Applying Open Principles of Internet to Energy Infrastructure</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_chief_open_internet_energy_infrastructure/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_chief_open_internet_energy_infrastructure/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Google's Chief Executive Officer Eric Schmidt, a member of President-elect Barack Obama's Transition Economic Advisory Board, said the government needs to focus on the areas of broadband infrastructure, research and alternative energy in an effort to rebuild the nation's economy. Openness is critical for that, he argued. The end-to-end principle that underlies the Internet, the open network, is a must. "It is that openness, the ability that anyone can play ... that drives the modern economy... Why don't we do the same thing with the energy grid? ...isn't it obvious?" <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_chief_open_internet_energy_infrastructure/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-19T15:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>