<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>CircleID: P2P</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Latest P2P related postings on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-10-15T17:47:00-08:00</dc:date>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Comcast is Right, the FCC is Wrong</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/2008928_comcast_right_fcc_wrong/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/2008928_comcast_right_fcc_wrong/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A fellow named Paul Korzeniowski has written a very good, concise piece on the Comcast action at the FCC for Forbes, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/entrepreneurs/2008/09/26/net-neutrality-comcast-ent-tech-cx_pk_0926bmightynetneutrality.html">Feds And Internet Service Providers Don't Mix.</a> He manages to describe the controversy in clear and unemotional language, which contrasts sharply with the neutralists who constantly use emotionally-charged terms such as "blocking," "Deep Packet Inspection," "forgery," and "monopoly" to describe their discomfort. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/2008928_comcast_right_fcc_wrong/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-28T15:49:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>law</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>RIAA Loses Again: No Legal Wins Against P2P File Sharers So Far</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/89251_riaa_p2p_file_sharers/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/89251_riaa_p2p_file_sharers/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has been taking a lot of people to court -- basically, harassing folks in an attempt to curb file-sharing. The $220,000 verdict against Jammy Thomas got a lot of news (and probably worried a lot of folks). However, on appeal (i.e., after a new court not cherry-picked by the RIAA to try the case looked things over), the RIAA lost... again. ...At its heart, the verdict reaffirms that simply making a copyrighted work available is not the same as actually distributing the work. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/89251_riaa_p2p_file_sharers/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-25T11:10:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>law</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comcast&apos;s Network Management Practices: A Brief Analysis</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/89238_comcast_network_management_practices_analysis/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/89238_comcast_network_management_practices_analysis/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Late last week, Comcast officially disclosed to the FCC details of its network management practices which have been a subject of considerable discussion here on CircleID. (My thanks to <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/09/comcast-disclos.html">Threat Level from Wired.com</a> for providing a convenient copy of Comcast's "Attachment A" in which this disclosure is made.) There's not a lot of startling disclosure in this document, but it does provide some useful concrete facts and figures. I'll quote the more interesting parts of the document here, and offer comment on it. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/89238_comcast_network_management_practices_analysis/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-23T07:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comcast Discloses Network Management Practices</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/comcast_network_management_practices/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/comcast_network_management_practices/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Comcast has provided U.S. regulators details of how it plans to change the way it manages Web traffic over its high speed Internet network without blocking any applications or content. The move comes after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88202_comcast_fcc_throttling_order/">voted last month</a> to uphold a complaint that Comcast had violated the regulator's open-Internet principles by hindering peer-to-peer traffic from applications such as BitTorrent. Comcast said on Friday that under the plan designed to give all users their "fair share" of bandwidth it would focus on managing the traffic of customers who are using most bandwidth when the network is congested. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/comcast_network_management_practices/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-20T09:08:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>law</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comcast Sues FCC, Says Net Neutrality Order Legally Inappropriate</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/comcast_sues_fcc/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/comcast_sues_fcc/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Comcast has filed suit against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) today in order to block <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_sanction_against_comcast_internet/">the agency's decision to sanction Comcast</a> for blocking certain Internet traffic. Comcast has released the following statement attributed to David L. Cohen, Executive Vice President of Comcast Corporation... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/comcast_sues_fcc/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-04T12:53:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>law</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>New gTLDs String Theory for Bidders</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtld_string_theory_for_bidders/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtld_string_theory_for_bidders/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The following is most of the generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) strings applied for in the 2000 and 2003 applications. Some are two, and even one character ASCII strings. Some have since been approved, or disapproved (which of course means nothing in the 2008 round). It is a universe of 180 strings. Enjoy. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtld_string_theory_for_bidders/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-03T20:55:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>p2p</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>P4P Aims to Solve Bandwidth Challenges</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88213_p4p_solving_bandwidth_challenges/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88213_p4p_solving_bandwidth_challenges/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Two professors from the University of Washington and Yale University, presenting at a conference in Seattle today, describe a new and faster data transfer technology across the Internet. Professors Arvind Krishnamurthy and Richard Yang believe their technology offers a better solution to current challenges facing broadband providers. Their algorithm, called P4P or "local file-sharing," finds the shortest path across the Internet by tracking users' locations -- improving both, download speeds by about 20% as well as bandwidth requirements. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88213_p4p_solving_bandwidth_challenges/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-21T15:09:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>p2p</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comcast Given 30 Days to Disclose Network Management Practices, Says FCC Order</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88202_comcast_fcc_throttling_order/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88202_comcast_fcc_throttling_order/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In follow up to <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_reprimands_comcast_internet_throttling/">August 1st ruling against Comcast</a>, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in a <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-183A1.pdf">67 page order</a> released today has given Comcast 30 days "to disclose the details of their unreasonable network management practices, submit a compliance plan describing how it intends to stop these unreasonable management practices by the end of the year, and disclose to both the Commission and the public the details of the network management practices that it intends to deploy following termination of its current practices." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88202_comcast_fcc_throttling_order/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-20T12:29:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>law</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Thousands of File Sharers Facing Lawsuits in UK</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/file_sharers_facing_lawsuits_in_uk/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/file_sharers_facing_lawsuits_in_uk/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Last month <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/six_largest_isps_uk_piracy_warning/">a government-backed deal was struck</a> between Britain's six biggest Internet service providers and the entertainment industry in order to send warning letters to file-sharers. Today it has been reported that thousands of people suspected of sharing music, films and games over the Internet are going to be facing legal action in UK for damages. One law firm, according to Reuters, is going to the High Court to force ISPs to release names and addresses of 7,000 suspected file-sharers and that they have already begun proceedings against several people in Britain. One British woman has been ordered to pay 16,000 pounds for downloading pinball game for free through a file-sharing site. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/file_sharers_facing_lawsuits_in_uk/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-20T11:03:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>law</category><category>p2p</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>FCC&apos;s Comcast Ruling Inconsistent and Incoherent</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88103_fcc_comcast_ruling_inconsistent_incoherent/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88103_fcc_comcast_ruling_inconsistent_incoherent/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[After voting on the Comcast order today, Kevin Martin and his Democratic Party colleagues issued press releases telling us how they saved the Internet from Comcast's discriminatory practices, but they've failed to release the actual order they adopted and subsequently re-wrote. Commissioner McDowell wasn't allowed to see the revised order until 7:00 PM the night before the meeting. Rumor has it that high-level spin doctors are still trying to remove all the rough edges, inconsistencies, and factual errors. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88103_fcc_comcast_ruling_inconsistent_incoherent/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-01T15:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>broadband</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>law</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>voip</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Another Wrong&#45;Headed WSJ Editorial</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87313_wrong_headed_wsj_editorial_fcc/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87313_wrong_headed_wsj_editorial_fcc/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Those wacky editorial writers at the Wall Street Journal just cannot seem to get the facts straight about network neutrality and what the FCC has done or can do on this matter. In the July 30, 2008 edition (Review and Outlook A14), the Journal vilifies FCC Chairman Kevin Martin for starting along the slippery slope of regulating Internet content. The Journal writers just seem to love hyperbole, and are not beyond ignoring the facts when they do not support a party line. Here are a few examples from the editorial... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87313_wrong_headed_wsj_editorial_fcc/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-31T13:44:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>wireless</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Six Largest ISPs in UK Agree to Send Warning Letters to Illegal Music, Movie Downloaders</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/six_largest_isps_uk_piracy_warning/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/six_largest_isps_uk_piracy_warning/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The music and film industries have launched a fight back against online piracy  today, persuading Britain's six biggest Internet providers, BT, Virgin Media, Orange, Tiscali, BSkyB and Carphone Warehouse, to send warning letters to those suspected of illegal file-sharing. The plan is aimed at an estimated 6.5 million Britons who have downloaded files illegally over the past year. ISPs had previously argued they were mere conduits and not responsible for content. But they agreed to the deal after the government said it would impose legislation if they did not work to curb illegal file-sharing. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/six_largest_isps_uk_piracy_warning/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-24T09:37:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>law</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>European Researchers Introduce Live BitTorrent Streaming, Aim to Replace Traditional Broadcasting</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87182_p2p_next_live_bittorrent_streaming/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87182_p2p_next_live_bittorrent_streaming/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[European researchers have launched a beta version of a peer-to-peer streaming video service that is intended to eventually replace traditional broadcasts. This is the latest development from the <a href="http://www.p2p-next.org/">P2P-Next</a> project which has announced its <a href="http://trial.p2p-next.org/">trial program</a> for streaming live video in true 4th generation P2P system using a zero-server approach. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87182_p2p_next_live_bittorrent_streaming/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-18T14:49:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>p2p</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>FCC and Comcast: Reasonably Vague</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/891411_fcc_comcast_reasonably_vague/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/891411_fcc_comcast_reasonably_vague/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So, the FCC will recommend that Comcast be "punished" or receive "sanctions" for its peer-to-peer throttling practice. And the network neutrality debate goes on, as does its ambiguities and vagueness. Even if you hate Comcast and agree with the net neutrality argument and the FCC's decision, one thing Comcast is correct in saying is that "reasonable network management" specified by the FCC in network neutrality policy set in 2005 is vague. Actually, the term "network management" by itself is broad before you even try to interpret what is meant by "reasonable", and it is not exactly correct in its application here... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/891411_fcc_comcast_reasonably_vague/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-14T11:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>No Fines for Comcast</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87113_no_fines_for_comcast/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87113_no_fines_for_comcast/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Note: this is an update on my earlier story, which incorrectly said that the AP reported that Chairman Martin was seeking to impose "fines" on Comcast. In fact, the story used the word "punish" rather than "fine," and a headline writer at the New York Times added "penalty" to it <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/technology/11fcc.html">"F.C.C. Chairman Favors Penalty on Comcast"</a> (I won't quote the story because I'm a blogger and the AP is the AP, so click through.) Much of the initial reaction to the story was obviously colored by the headline. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87113_no_fines_for_comcast/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-12T14:50:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>law</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>