<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>CircleID: Internet Protocol</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Latest Internet Protocol related postings on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-12-04T12:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>The Global Network Initiative</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_global_network_initiative/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_global_network_initiative/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[After more than two years of work behind closed doors, the Global Network Initiative is launching this week. That's the corporate code of conduct on free speech and privacy I've been talking about in generalities for quite some time. By midnight Tuesday U.S. East Coast time, the full set of documents and list of initial signatories will be made publicly available at globalnetworkinitiative.org. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_global_network_initiative/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-28T16:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>privacy</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Finnish Security Researchers Decide to Go Public With a TCP/IP Flaw</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/security_public_tcp_ip_flaw/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/security_public_tcp_ip_flaw/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Researchers at a Finnish security firm <a href="http://www.outpost24.com">Outpost 24</a> claim to have discovered a flaw in the Internet Protocol that can disrupt any computer or server. After keeping the flaw quiet for years, the researchers hope that going public will help accelerate the creation of a solution, according to PC World Australia. The flaw enables attackers to bring computers and servers to a halt by sending a few specially formed TCP/IP packets. The result can be compared to a denial of service attack (DDoS), in which networks are flooded with traffic. However in this case only minimal amount of traffic is required. "We're talking 10 packets per second to take down one service," Jack Lewis, a senior researcher with Outpost24. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/security_public_tcp_ip_flaw/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-01T09:03:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Do the IM Protocol Wars Even Matter?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/89249_im_protocol_wars/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/89249_im_protocol_wars/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Do you care any more about zillion different IM services? Do you care about the IM protocol wars that have plagued the usage of IM for the last years? Odds are that if you are an IM user like me, you probably don't. Why not? Simple... we've unified the IM services on the client side and basically stopped caring about the various services and protocols. I was reminded of this fact this morning when I received a message saying that an update was available for Adium on my Mac that solved a really annoying disconnection problem with Yahoo!Messenger. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/89249_im_protocol_wars/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-24T09:39:01-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>voip</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>New gTLDs String Theory for Bidders</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtld_string_theory_for_bidders/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtld_string_theory_for_bidders/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The following is most of the generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) strings applied for in the 2000 and 2003 applications. Some are two, and even one character ASCII strings. Some have since been approved, or disapproved (which of course means nothing in the 2008 round). It is a universe of 180 strings. Enjoy. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtld_string_theory_for_bidders/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-03T20:55:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>p2p</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Internet&apos;s Biggest Security Hole</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/internets_biggest_security_hole/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/internets_biggest_security_hole/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Kim Zetter reporting on Wired: Two security researchers have demonstrated a new technique to stealthily intercept internet traffic on a scale previously presumed to be unavailable to anyone outside of intelligence agencies like the National Security Agency. The tactic exploits the internet routing protocol BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) to let an attacker surreptitiously monitor unencrypted internet traffic anywhere in the world, and even modify it before it reaches its destination. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/internets_biggest_security_hole/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-27T09:30:01-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cyberattack</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>UK&apos;s Defense Group Warns Against Internet Protocol Security Challenges</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/cpni_internet_protocol_security_challenges/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/cpni_internet_protocol_security_challenges/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Recent report says many textbooks and articles have created the myth that the Internet Protocols (IP) were designed for warfare environments, while in reality they originally focused on operational aspects of the protocol and overlooked security implications. United Kingdom's Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI) has released a document raising awareness of the many security threats from attacks based on the Internet protocol. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/cpni_internet_protocol_security_challenges/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-21T09:33:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Manufacturers Urged to Upgrade Routers, Network Management Software Before End of Year</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/upgrade_routers_network_management_software_as/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/upgrade_routers_network_management_software_as/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Regional Internet Registries (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_Internet_Registry">RIRs</a>) have warned that routers and network management software should be upgraded ahead of the increased distribution of four-byte (also known as 32-bit) Autonomous System (AS) numbers. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/members/602/">Geoff Huston</a>, Chief Scientist at Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (<a href="http://www.apnic.net">APNIC</a> - Asia and the Pacific region RIR), expressed severe concerns over failure to prepare for four-byte AS numbers... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/upgrade_routers_network_management_software_as/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-28T12:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>regional_registries</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>NeuStar Names Alex Berry Head of Internet Infrastructure Services Group</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87232_neustar_alex_berry_head_internet_infrastructure/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87232_neustar_alex_berry_head_internet_infrastructure/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[NeuStar, Inc. today announced that it has appointed Alex Berry as senior vice president and general manager of NeuStar's Internet Infrastructure Services group, which includes domain name registry services as well as the UltraDNS and Webmetrics service lines. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87232_neustar_alex_berry_head_internet_infrastructure/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-23T12:46:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comcast Proposes Its IPv6 Transition Solution to IETF, Invites ISPs to Participate</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87214_comcast_ipv6_transition_solution_ietf/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87214_comcast_ipv6_transition_solution_ietf/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Comcast, the largest cable operator in the U.S., is reported to have developed an innovative approach for gradually migrating its customers to IPv6. The company has 24.7 million cable customers, 14.1 million broadband customers and 5.2 million voice customers. The solution dubbed Dual-Stack Lite, is backwards compatible with IPv4 and can be deployed incrementally according the company. Comcast has <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00">submitted this proposal</a> to the Internet standards body, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) which has scheduled a review during the upcoming IETF meeting in Dublin later this month. From the Comcast document submitted to IETF... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87214_comcast_ipv6_transition_solution_ietf/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-21T16:29:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Introductory Remarks from Innovation &apos;08</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86147_net_neutrality_innovation_081/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86147_net_neutrality_innovation_081/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's my opening remarks from <a href="http://www.mediaaccess.org/events/innovation-08s-second-forum-open-access-and-the-new-net-neutrality-on-june-12-at-santa-clara-university#body">Media Access Project's Innovation '08</a> in Santa Clara this morning. A DVD will be available shortly. This was a lively discussion, with Google and Vuze on the case. Good morning and welcome. My name is Richard Bennett and I'm a network engineer. I've built networking products for 30 years and contributed to a dozen networking standards, including Ethernet and Wi-Fi... I'm opposed to net neutrality regulations because they foreclose some engineering options that we're going to need for the Internet to become the one true general-purpose network that links all of us to each other, connects all our devices to all our information, and makes the world a better place. Let me explain. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86147_net_neutrality_innovation_081/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-14T19:36:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>broadband</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>iptv</category><category>law</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>p2p</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>voip</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Microsoft&apos;s Contribution Was TCP/IP</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84259_microsofts_contribution_tcp_ip/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84259_microsofts_contribution_tcp_ip/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There's a fascinating blog discussion going on <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/24/andreessen-msft-did-us-a-favour/">here</a>, <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/04/marc-andreessen.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/Battelle-Casts-But-Andreessen-Doesnt-Take-The-Bait/">here</a>. The conversation is around Marc Andreessen's refusal to trash Microsoft and Bill Gates on stage.  Andreessen points to the way in which the company drove the industry forward in the 1990's, and Mathew Ingram says "love them or hate them, at least Microsoft standardized the operating-system market"... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84259_microsofts_contribution_tcp_ip/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-25T09:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_protocol</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>The End of End&#45;to&#45;End?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_end_of_end_to_end/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_end_of_end_to_end/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[One of the major principles of the architecture of the Internet was encapsulated in a paper by Saltzer, Reed and Clark, "End-to-End Arguments in System Design". This paper, originally published in 1981, encapsulated very clearly the looming tension between the network and the application: "The function in question can completely and correctly be implemented only with the knowledge and help of the application standing at the end points of the communication system. Therefore, providing that questioned function as a feature of the communication system itself is not possible." At the time this end-to-end argument was akin to networking heresy! <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_end_of_end_to_end/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-24T09:27:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>p2p</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Cisco Speaks at FOSE on IPv6 Enterprise Architecture Transition</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/84410_cisco_ipv6_enterprise_architecture_transition/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/84410_cisco_ipv6_enterprise_architecture_transition/</link>
			<description><![CDATA["The world is flattening," says Dave Rubal at the FOSE Conference and Exhibition this week in Washington, DC. "The race for IT dominance is on, and it is coming west." Mr. Rubal, Cisco's Worldwide Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) Task Force Lead, spoke of the tremendous race in IT dominance that is occurring, stating that the "mainstay technologies at the Beijing Olympics will be IPv6-powered." IPv6 is in line to replace version 4, but Rubal hinted that China and other Far East countries may be adopting the new version faster than the United States... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/84410_cisco_ipv6_enterprise_architecture_transition/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-04T13:04:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>ipv6</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Hot Architectural Issues for the Internet</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/hot_architectural_issues_the_internet/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/hot_architectural_issues_the_internet/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Internet Architecture Board's (<a href="http://www.iab.org/">IAB</a>) chair, Olaf Kolkman, asked the members of the IAB to provide a statement paper each on what they believe the current most pressing issues in terms of Internet architecture are... I have thought about this for the past few days, and realised that it's hard to come up with overarching issues and even harder to come up with issues, where the IAB actually could make a difference. But I came with up with two issues. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/hot_architectural_issues_the_internet/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-02T08:28:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>ipv6</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>IPv6 in Slovak Academic Network</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_in_slovak_academic_network/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_in_slovak_academic_network/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The main reason for developing a new internet protocol was based on lack of address; however this was not the only reason. Unfortunately, many people think of IPv6 only as enormous address space, but there are a lot of other advantages, for example... authorizations and authentication function are implemented directly in the protocol and are mandatory... automatic configuration of network interfaces based on their physical address... protocol itself recognizes data streams which must be transmitted in real time, and the data must be processed with highest priority... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_in_slovak_academic_network/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-02-29T14:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>ip_addressing</category><category>ipv6</category><category>regional_registries</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>