<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>CircleID: Domain Names</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Latest Domain Names related postings on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-08-29T10:37:00-08:00</dc:date>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>How Rise in Nationalism and Industry&apos;s Lack of Foresight Could Mean a Fragmented and Isolated Web</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88267_nationalism_internationalized_domain_names/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88267_nationalism_internationalized_domain_names/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have been thinking a lot lately on the topic of the free flow of information on the internet -- what kinds of tools are available now and in the future for governments (especially repressive ones) to control content, isolate their people and keep any contrary viewpoints censored. I had an interesting conversation with a Practice Lead from IFTF.org. <a href="http://iftf.org/">The Institute for the Future</a> (IFTF) is a California based independent, nonprofit research group with 40 years of experience in identifying emerging trends that will transform global society... Turns out they are quite concerned about the fragmentation and control of the Internet as well. But will it be an inevitability? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88267_nationalism_internationalized_domain_names/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-26T07:07:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>domain_names</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>multilinguism</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>.ORG Domain Name Registrations Pass 7 Million</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88259_org_domain_name_registrations/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88259_org_domain_name_registrations/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[.ORG, The Public Interest Registry, the registry behind the global .ORG domain name, announced today that more than 7 million domain names are now registered as .ORG, making it the third largest generic domain (after .com and .net). Since management of the registry was assumed by Public Interest Registry in 2003, .ORG registrations have increased more than 250%. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88259_org_domain_name_registrations/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-25T09:10:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Did We Miss ICANN&apos;s Reply?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/idn_org_did_we_miss_icann_reply/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/idn_org_did_we_miss_icann_reply/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On July 29, the Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) and Public Interest Registry (PIR) sent out a joint letter to <a href="http://www.icann.org">ICANN</a> asking it to consider the interests of the end-users as core to its policies in Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) implementation... As of today's date, August 21, 2008, we have yet to receive even an acknowledgement of receipt of our letter... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/idn_org_did_we_miss_icann_reply/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-21T12:56:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>multilinguism</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>dotMobi Builds on Breakthough DeviceAtlas Mobile Development Tool</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88214_dotmobi_deviceatlas_mobile_development_tool/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88214_dotmobi_deviceatlas_mobile_development_tool/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[dotMobi, the company behind .mobi - the only ICANN-approved Internet address designed specifically for helping consumers find mobile content - today announced the inclusion of Mobizoft video content adaptation data into the award-winning DeviceAtlas, the definitive source of mobile handset information for mobile content developers. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88214_dotmobi_deviceatlas_mobile_development_tool/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-21T02:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>mobile</category><category>top_level_domains</category><category>wireless</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Will .cn Become the New .com?</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88203_will_cn_become_the_new_com/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88203_will_cn_become_the_new_com/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I recently came across a chart of the most popular top-level domains (TLDs), compiled by <a href="http://www.domainesinfo.fr/statistiques.php">Stephane Van Gelder</a>. Although I keep track of country code TLD registrations for the <a href="http://bytelevel.com/map/ccTLD.html">Country Codes of the World</a> map (see also <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/710110_cctld_map_country_code_top_level_domains/">related CircleID post</a>), Stephane tracks all domains, including .com, .net., etc. And when I saw it I got to thinking... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88203_will_cn_become_the_new_com/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-20T14:11:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Hostway Announces &quot;The .Pro Red Carpet VIP Affair&quot; Domain Reservation Period</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/pro_domain_reservation_period/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/pro_domain_reservation_period/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hostway Corporation, the global Web solutions leader, announced it is now taking reservations for the .Pro Top Level Domain (TLD) through August 31, 2008. Hostway's wholly owned subsidiary, <a href="http://www.registry.pro/">RegistryPro</a>, is the exclusive Internet registry for .Pro, a TLD for licensed professionals and entities. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/pro_domain_reservation_period/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-19T16:58:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>top_level_domains</category><category>web</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>dotMobi Premium Domain Name Now Supports Independent and Established Music Acts</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88182_dotmobi_domain_name_music_acts/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88182_dotmobi_domain_name_music_acts/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[dotMobi, the consortium behind .mobi, the only Internet address created specifically for finding Web sites that work on mobile phones, today announced the launch of ringtones.mobi, a site that makes it easier for music fans to buy ringtones and mobile-friendly wallpaper images from independent and established music acts. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88182_dotmobi_domain_name_music_acts/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-18T13:27:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>mobile</category><category>top_level_domains</category><category>web</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ICANN&apos;s Allocation Method for New TLDs</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/icanns_allocation_method_for_new_tlds/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/icanns_allocation_method_for_new_tlds/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ICANN recently commissioned <a href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-08aug08-en.htm">a report</a> from <a href="http://powerauction.com/">Power Auctions LLC</a> to investigate the merits of auctioning new Top-Level Domains (TLDs). Below I outline some of the issues related to stakeholder interests and mechanism design... Successfully managing the design of an allocation mechanism for new TLDs will entail coordinating functions across various competencies. To rely on a standard auction mechanism for the allocations would be a historic setback for the domain name industry, as successful allocation design is all in the details. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/icanns_allocation_method_for_new_tlds/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-15T09:56:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Domain Name Lessons From iTunes</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_name_lessons_from_itunes/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_name_lessons_from_itunes/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What do <a href="http://itunes.com/">iTunes</a> and a <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/typosquatting_a_solution/">cooperative domain-name Intellectual Property (IP) regime</a> have in common? They are market solutions to illegal activity: free downloading of music and free use of brands in domain names, respectively. The music industry tried to fight the free downloading of copyright-protected music by taking legal action against free downloaders under the pretext that their activity siphons industry revenue... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/domain_name_lessons_from_itunes/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-11T13:32:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>law</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Moniker.com Offers Premium Search&#45;focused Domains for its Live Auction at Search Engine Strategies</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/moniker_search_focused_domain/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/moniker_search_focused_domain/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Moniker an Oversee.net company and provider of Domain Asset Management services, revealed today the premium domain names available at for its exclusive live and extended online auction at the Search Engine Strategies (SES), the high-tech and internet company event of the year. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/moniker_search_focused_domain/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-11T12:44:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>top_level_domains</category><category>web</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ICANN Paints Itself Into a Corner</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88117_icann_paints_itself_into_corner/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88117_icann_paints_itself_into_corner/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ICANN recently commissioned <a href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-08aug08-en.htm">a report</a> from a domain auction company to see whether it would be a good idea to auction Top-Level Domains (TLDs) that have multiple applicants. Remarkably, the domain auctioneers came to the conclusion that auctions are a great idea, which they surely are for some people. But are they a good idea for ICANN? And if ICANN admits they can't evaluate competing applications on their merits, how can they keep the process from turning into another speculative land grab? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88117_icann_paints_itself_into_corner/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-11T07:16:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ICANN to Auction New Generic Top Level Domains</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88984_icann_auction_new_top_level_domains/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88984_icann_auction_new_top_level_domains/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.icann.org">ICANN</a> has just <a href="http://icann.org/en/topics/economic-case-auctions-08aug08-en.pdf" >published a paper</a> from its contractor PowerAuctions LLC, regarding the use of auctions to award new Top Level Domains (TLD) strings in case of contention. I can understand what ICANN wants to avoid. In the past, it has been criticized for using the "beauty contest" model with the redelegation of the .net TLD... However, the auction model is based on the idea that whoever wins the auction will be able to recoup its investment on the sale... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88984_icann_auction_new_top_level_domains/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-09T08:44:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>DomainPeople Launches &quot;The .Pro Red Carpet VIP Affair&quot; Domain Reservation Period</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88734_domainpeople_launches_pro_domain_reservation/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88734_domainpeople_launches_pro_domain_reservation/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[DomainPeople, the eighth official domain name registrar accredited by the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), announced today it will be accepting reservations for .Pro domain names from new registrants through August 31, 2008. The highly-anticipated relaunch date for .Pro has now been confirmed for September 8, 2008. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88734_domainpeople_launches_pro_domain_reservation/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T15:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>.ORG &amp;amp; NCUC Joint Letter to ICANN on Internationalized Domain Names</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88710_org_ncuc_internationalized_domain_names/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88710_org_ncuc_internationalized_domain_names/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Recently we teamed up with the Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) to express our concern to ICANN that the rights and needs of end-users are taken into account in the discussion of Internationalized Domain Names (IDN). <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88710_org_ncuc_internationalized_domain_names/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T10:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>multilinguism</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ICANN Highlights DNS Vulnerability, Releases Domain Testing Tool</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_dns_domain_testing_tool/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_dns_domain_testing_tool/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In response to the DNS vulnerability issue, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has announced the release of an <a href="http://www.iana.org/reports/2008/cross-pollination-faq.html">FAQ</a> and a web based <a href="http://recursive.iana.org/">domain testing tool</a>. From ICANN's announcement: "Due to the distributed nature of the DNS, no one organization can implement a fix for this vulnerability. It requires the cooperation of all name server operators and DNS software vendors. However, ICANN sees an important goal in spreading awareness of the need to update Internet infrastructure to cope with the threat. The organization has been undertaking significant outreach efforts to top-level domain operators to advise them on the issue." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_dns_domain_testing_tool/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T09:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>