<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>CircleID: Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Latest Censorship related postings on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-12-04T12:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>China Internet Cafes Forced to Switch Computers Running Microsoft to Chinese Operating System</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/china_internet_cafes_microsoft_to_chinese_os/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/china_internet_cafes_microsoft_to_chinese_os/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Authorities in the southeastern Chinese city of Nanchang are requiring all local Internet cafes to replace their Microsoft Windows XP operating systems with a Chinese-made system, Red Flag Linux, according to officials and Internet cafe owners. An official with the Nanchang Cultural Discipline Team, which oversees the roughly 600 Internet cafes operating in Nanchang city, said the new operating systems were mandatory. "We have already started installing the new software in all Internet cafes. All of them must have this new one," the official said. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/china_internet_cafes_microsoft_to_chinese_os/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-03T14:51:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>privacy</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Free, Slow, Censored Internet: A Bad Idea</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_free_slow_censored_internet_bad_idea/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_free_slow_censored_internet_bad_idea/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The FCC is looking for an organization to provide free, slow, and censored Internet access. The censorship apparently would include email as well as websites. According to an article in today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em>: "Outgoing Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin is pushing for action in December on a plan to offer free, pornography-free wireless Internet service to all Americans, despite objections from the wireless industry and some consumer groups [nb. and from me]... The winning bidder would be required to set aside a quarter of the airwaves for a free Internet service [nb. the WSJ hasn't got that part quite right]." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081201_free_slow_censored_internet_bad_idea/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-01T13:18:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>censorship</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>wireless</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>NTIA Seeks Nominations to Serve on the Online Safety and Technology Working Group</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081122_ntia_nominations_online_safetty/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081122_ntia_nominations_online_safetty/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the midst of the election season, Congress passed a plethora of Internet related laws. Most involved child protection. One involved webcaster protection. Wasting no time, the impact of the new laws is already being felt through federal agency implementation. On Friday, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) in the Department of Commerce released the following notice... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081122_ntia_nominations_online_safetty/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-22T13:23:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>censorship</category><category>law</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Government Net censorship Plan Facing Backlash in Australia</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/government_net_censorship_australia_backlash/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/government_net_censorship_australia_backlash/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As opposition grows against the Government's controversial plan to censor the internet, the head of one of Australia's largest ISPs has labeled the Communications Minister the worst we've had in the past 15 years. Despite significant opposition from internet providers, consumers, engineers, network administrators and online rights activists, the Government is pressing ahead with its election promise of protecting people from unwanted material, this week calling for expressions of interests from ISPs keen to participate in live trials of the proposed internet filtering system. Michael Malone, head of iiNet, Australia's largest ISP, said he would sign up to be involved in the "ridiculous" trials, just to show how impractical it is. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/government_net_censorship_australia_backlash/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-11T10:17:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>censorship</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>privacy</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>The Global Network Initiative</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_global_network_initiative/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_global_network_initiative/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[After more than two years of work behind closed doors, the Global Network Initiative is launching this week. That's the corporate code of conduct on free speech and privacy I've been talking about in generalities for quite some time. By midnight Tuesday U.S. East Coast time, the full set of documents and list of initial signatories will be made publicly available at globalnetworkinitiative.org. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081028_global_network_initiative/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-28T16:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>internet_protocol</category><category>privacy</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>New DPI Technology Allows ISPs to Inspect Every File, Image, and Movie Transmitted by Users</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/dpi_copyrouter_isp_inspect_every_file/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/dpi_copyrouter_isp_inspect_every_file/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[MSNBC reports that an Australian company, Brilliant Digital Entertainment Ltd., is marketing a new controversial deep packet inspection technology called CopyRouter in the U.S. cable of allowing ISPs to check every file passing through their network. More specifically, this technology can check "every image, every movie, every document attached to an email or found in a Web search," to see if it matches a list of illegal images from a law enforcement agency. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/dpi_copyrouter_isp_inspect_every_file/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-16T17:44:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>censorship</category><category>p2p</category><category>privacy</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Skype Messes Up, Badly</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081002_skype_messes_up_badly/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081002_skype_messes_up_badly/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Open Net Initiative's Information Warfare Monitor project has published a stunning report by "Hacktivist" Nart Villeneuve titled: "Breaching Trust: An analysis of surveillance and security practices on China's TOM-Skype platform." It has been covered by both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081002_skype_messes_up_badly/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-02T22:21:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>privacy</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Investigation Reveals Massive Security and Privacy Breaches Affecting Chinese Version of Skype</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081002_china_privacy_breach_tom_skype/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081002_china_privacy_breach_tom_skype/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Canadian human-rights activists and computer security researchers have released a report on the extensive surveillance system in China that monitors and archives text conversations that include politically charged words. The research group, called Information Warfare Monitor, is a joint project of The SecDev Group, and the <a href="http://www.citizenlab.org/">Citizen Lab</a>, at the Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto. The following are introductory excerpts from the study... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081002_china_privacy_breach_tom_skype/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-02T10:26:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>privacy</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Supposedly Private Meeting of China&apos;s Censorship Division and Wikipedia Founder</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081001_china_censorship_wikipedia_wales/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081001_china_censorship_wikipedia_wales/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has met with the Chinese government body in charge of censoring online content in the country. Cai Mingzhao, Vice Director of China's State Council Information Office in charge of China's "Internet Management Division" (censorship division), discussed Wales' concerns regarding censorship. Although no deals or agreements where made, it has been reported that the meeting has "opened a channel of communication and dialogue between the Wikipedia community and the Chinese government." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081001_china_censorship_wikipedia_wales/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-10-01T09:56:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>web</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>How Rise in Nationalism and Industry&apos;s Lack of Foresight Could Mean a Fragmented and Isolated Web</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88267_nationalism_internationalized_domain_names/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88267_nationalism_internationalized_domain_names/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have been thinking a lot lately on the topic of the free flow of information on the internet -- what kinds of tools are available now and in the future for governments (especially repressive ones) to control content, isolate their people and keep any contrary viewpoints censored. I had an interesting conversation with a Practice Lead from IFTF.org. <a href="http://iftf.org/">The Institute for the Future</a> (IFTF) is a California based independent, nonprofit research group with 40 years of experience in identifying emerging trends that will transform global society... Turns out they are quite concerned about the fragmentation and control of the Internet as well. But will it be an inevitability? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88267_nationalism_internationalized_domain_names/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-26T07:07:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>domain_names</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>multilinguism</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Internet Companies in Negotiations for Agreement on Code of Conduct in China</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88664_internet_companies_code_of_conduct_china/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88664_internet_companies_code_of_conduct_china/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, in negotiations with other Internet companies and human rights organizations, have reached an agreement on a voluntary code of conduct for activities in China and other countries that censor the Internet. The participants are reviewing the agreement for final approval. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88664_internet_companies_code_of_conduct_china/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-06T06:53:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>web</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>GIFC Offers Software Tools to Overcome Internet Censorship in China</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/gifc_software_internet_censorship_china/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/gifc_software_internet_censorship_china/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Reporters covering the Beijing Olympics who are frustrated by Chinese Internet censorship can use free software tools developed to help Chinese users circumvent these controls, according to a representative of a group that develops such software (see related <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/global-internet-freedom-consortium-gifc/story.aspx?guid=%7BA4D04783-1E8B-4169-A7B1-AAB527517F55%7D&dist=hppr">press release</a>). "It's a very good time remind Western reporters that there are such tools," said Tao Wang, director of operations for the Global Internet Freedom Consortium (<a href="http://www.internetfreedom.org/">GIFC</a>), adding that some Western reporters based in China routinely use the group's tools. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/gifc_software_internet_censorship_china/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-04T10:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>International Olympic Committee Admits to Internet Censorship Deal with China</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ioc_internet_censorship_china/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ioc_internet_censorship_china/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In follow up to <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/china_internet_spying_olympics/">China's Internet spying and censorship during the Olympics</a>, today's reports indicate that some officials from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) had made prior arrangements to allow China block sensitive websites despite promises of unrestricted access. China had committed to providing media with the same freedom to report on the Games as they enjoyed at previous Olympics, but journalists have this week complained of finding access to sites deemed sensitive to its communist leadership blocked, Nick Mulvenney of Reuters reports. Updated 7/31/2008 <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ioc_internet_censorship_china/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-30T10:28:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>privacy</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ICANN Takes First Step to Becoming a Global Content Regulator</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86278_icann_global_content_regulator/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86278_icann_global_content_regulator/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There has been wide coverage of <a href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-4-26jun08-en.htm">ICANN's decision</a> this week to adopt a new process for creating new global Top Level Domains (gTLDs). Publishing a clear, transparent and objective process is thought likely to result in a considerable expansion of gTLDs -- although nobody really knows whether this means "quite a lot" or "<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/27/internet.digitalmedia">many thousands</a>"... Less attention has been given to one of the new tests ICANN will use when considering whether to approve a new gTLD, contained in GNSO's sixth recommendation... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86278_icann_global_content_regulator/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-27T08:28:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>The FCC Stumbles Into Internet Filtering</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86257_fcc_internet_filtering/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86257_fcc_internet_filtering/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What could be bad about free wireless Internet access? How about censorship by federally mandated filters that make it no longer "Internet." That's the effect of the FCC's proposed service rules for Advanced Wireless Service spectrum in the 2155-2180 MHz band, as set out in a July 20 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Acting on a request of M2Z Networks, which wants to provide "free, family-friendly wireless broadband," the FCC proposes to require licensees of this spectrum band to offer free two-way wireless broadband Internet service to the public, with least 25% of their network capacity. So far so good, but on the next page, the agency guts the meaning of "broadband Internet" with a content filtering requirement. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86257_fcc_internet_filtering/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-25T07:42:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>censorship</category><category>net_neutrality</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>wireless</category>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>