<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>CircleID:</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Latest  related postings on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-08-08T10:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>ACLU, Anti&#45;Spam Laws, and the First Amendment</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/aclu_anti_spam_laws_and_the_first_amendment/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/aclu_anti_spam_laws_and_the_first_amendment/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://techliberation.com/2008/08/07/anti-spam-laws-and-the-first-amendment/">an article published by the Technology Liberation Front</a>, Cato Institute adjunct scholar Tim Lee dissects a <a href="http://www.acluva.org/docket/jaynes.html">recent argument by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)</a> regarding free speech &amp; anti-spam laws. It's been interesting to watch the ACLU wrestle with anti-spam legislation. Their entire purpose is to work through the legal system to protect our civil rights, as defined in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights" >First Amendment</a> -- which is why I've been a card-carrying member since before I was old enough to vote... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/aclu_anti_spam_laws_and_the_first_amendment/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-08T10:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>law</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>spam</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Blocking or Metering Broadband Access is a False Choice, Says New Report</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88894_blocking_metering_broadband_false_choice/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88894_blocking_metering_broadband_false_choice/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[n a report released today by the Free Press, Derek Turner, Research Director argues that, in light of <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/fcc_reprimands_comcast_internet_throttling/">recent FCC ruling against Comcast</a>, it is a "false choice" to believe that "because application blocking is out of bounds, providers now will be forced to use some type of 'metering' to control network congestion." In other words, if ISPs are not allowed to block applications, then usage-based pricing is NOT their only other viable option, asserts Turner. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88894_blocking_metering_broadband_false_choice/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-08T09:40:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>access_providers</category><category>broadband</category><category>net_neutrality</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Meet the Feds: Recruiting Hackers</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/meet_the_feds_recruiting_hackers/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/meet_the_feds_recruiting_hackers/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Speaking before an overflowing ballroom at the Black Hat security conference, representatives from U.S. government and FBI made assertions regarding government's active involvement in the fight against Internet threats, terrorism, and cyber crime. They also made it clear that they want hackers to join the effort. "The reason why we come here is we hope to attract folks to government service. And if we can't get you in service, then we want partnerships on working on security issues... It's people like yourselves that understand the threat that need to come into the government and help us address this problem," said James Finch, assistant director of the FBI's cyber division. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/meet_the_feds_recruiting_hackers/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T16:29:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>DomainPeople Launches &quot;The .Pro Red Carpet VIP Affair&quot; Domain Reservation Period</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88734_domainpeople_launches_pro_domain_reservation/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88734_domainpeople_launches_pro_domain_reservation/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[DomainPeople, the eighth official domain name registrar accredited by the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), announced today it will be accepting reservations for .Pro domain names from new registrants through August 31, 2008. The highly-anticipated relaunch date for .Pro has now been confirmed for September 8, 2008. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88734_domainpeople_launches_pro_domain_reservation/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T15:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Cyber Security Commission Compiling Recommendations for the Next U.S. Presidency</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/csis_cyber_security_commission/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/csis_cyber_security_commission/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[During a panel discussion at the Black Hat conference, four members from a U.S. private organization called "<a href="http://www.csis.org/tech/cyber/">Commission on Cyber Security for the 44th Presidency</a>," established by Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), sought input from the security community as part of their <a href="http://www.csis.org/component/option,com_csis_progj/task,view/id,1154/">mandate</a> to "develop recommendations for a comprehensive strategy to improve cyber security in federal systems and in critical infrastructure". <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/csis_cyber_security_commission/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T15:14:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>cyberattack</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Technologists vs. Marketers: Talking Incompatible Talk Leads to Walking in the Wrong Direction</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88715_technologists_vs_marketers/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88715_technologists_vs_marketers/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As if conversations between technologists and marketers weren't already difficult enough, it appears that the Direct Marketing Association's (DMA) Email Experience Council <a href="http://blog.emailexperience.org/2008/07/make_it_pop_know_the_lingo_ema.html">wants to redefine</a> long-standardized terms such as "header" and "message." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88715_technologists_vs_marketers/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T13:49:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>spam</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Can ICANN Manage the DNS Root Zone by Itself? &quot;No!&quot; Says US Department of Commerce</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88712_icann_manage_dns_root_zone/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88712_icann_manage_dns_root_zone/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In a recent <a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/comments/2008/ICANN_080730.html">letter</a>, the US Department of Commerce NTIA strongly denied being engaged in discussions about a "root zone transition" from VeriSign to ICANN. The community, ICANN President Strategic Committee (PSC), and perhaps ICANN and IANA staff are suddenly informed that no transition of root zone management is going to occur. What happened? With the touted ICANN transparency and accountability principles, why such a shift in (perceived) ICANN strategic directions coming from its overseeing government department? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88712_icann_manage_dns_root_zone/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T12:16:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>internet_governance</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>If Thou Be&apos;st as Poor for a Subject as He&apos;s for a King&#8230;</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88711_spam_kings/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88711_spam_kings/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Way back in 1995, Wired reporter Simson Garfinkel <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.02/spam.king_pr.html">gave Jeff Slaton</a> the name "Spam King." Less than a year later, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanford_Wallace">Sanford Wallace</a> earned the title -- and soon had to share it (and his upstream provider) with Walt Rines. Others have come and gone; Sanford and Walt reappear every few years, together or separately, only to be <a href="http://boxofmeat.net/post/34718471/chicago-tribune-myspace-tells-ap-it-has-won-234m-spam">sued away again</a>... it seems as if any spammer noticed by law enforcement is immediately crowned "the Spam King," even when there are multiple such crownings happening at the same time. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88711_spam_kings/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T11:42:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>law</category><category>spam</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>IPv6 Considered a Problem by Some Users</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_considered_a_problem/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_considered_a_problem/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch_feeds?hl=en&q=IPv6&ie=utf-8&num=10&output=atom">Google Blog Search Alert</a> looking for posts over IPv6 in my RSS reader. What strikes me is the number of posts explaining how to disable IPv6 in Windows Vista, MacOSX, <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/">Ubuntu</a> and other flavours of Linux. It looks like disabling IPv6 makes web browsing faster for a lot of people, independently of which operating system is being used. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_considered_a_problem/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T11:18:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>ipv6</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>.ORG &amp;amp; NCUC Joint Letter to ICANN on Internationalized Domain Names</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88710_org_ncuc_internationalized_domain_names/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88710_org_ncuc_internationalized_domain_names/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Recently we teamed up with the Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) to express our concern to ICANN that the rights and needs of end-users are taken into account in the discussion of Internationalized Domain Names (IDN). <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88710_org_ncuc_internationalized_domain_names/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T10:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>multilinguism</category><category>policy_regulation</category><category>top_level_domains</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>ICANN Highlights DNS Vulnerability, Releases Domain Testing Tool</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_dns_domain_testing_tool/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_dns_domain_testing_tool/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In response to the DNS vulnerability issue, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has announced the release of an <a href="http://www.iana.org/reports/2008/cross-pollination-faq.html">FAQ</a> and a web based <a href="http://recursive.iana.org/">domain testing tool</a>. From ICANN's announcement: "Due to the distributed nature of the DNS, no one organization can implement a fix for this vulnerability. It requires the cooperation of all name server operators and DNS software vendors. However, ICANN sees an important goal in spreading awareness of the need to update Internet infrastructure to cope with the threat. The organization has been undertaking significant outreach efforts to top-level domain operators to advise them on the issue." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_dns_domain_testing_tool/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-07T09:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>domain_names</category><category>domain_registries</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Daily Search Engine Usage Reaching Email Usage</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88613_daily_search_usage_reaching_email/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88613_daily_search_usage_reaching_email/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Use of search engines on a daily bases has been steadily rising from about one-third in 2002 to current rate of just under 50% according to a recent report by Pew Internet & American Life Project. With this increase, the search engine use will soon be reaching that of email which is currently 60% of internet users. The study also points out that these "new figures propel search further out of the pack, well ahead of other popular internet activities, such as checking the news, which 39% of internet users do on a typical day, or checking the weather, which 30% do on a typical day." <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88613_daily_search_usage_reaching_email/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-06T22:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>web</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Day 30: Kaminsky DNS Bug Disclosure</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88670_kaminsky_dns_bug_disclosure/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88670_kaminsky_dns_bug_disclosure/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In a highly anticipated presentation, Internet security researcher Dan Kaminsky today gave details of the much talked about Domain Name System (DNS) vulnerability issue which has been intensely covered since it was publicly announced a month ago on Jul 8th. Although original plans entailed keeping the bug details undisclosed for 30 days in order to allow for necessary security patches to be implemented around the world, details of the bug were eventually leaked-and-confirmed 13 days after its public announcement. Even so, just hours ago in jam-packed ballroom during the Black Hat conference, Kaminsky delivered his 100-plus-slide presentation detailing the DNS flaw that, if exploited, could potentially "destroy the Web". <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88670_kaminsky_dns_bug_disclosure/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-06T19:06:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>dns</category><category>security</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Email Portability, DKIM, and Socio&#45;Political Implications on Tech Development</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88661_email_portability_dkim_socio_political_implications/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88661_email_portability_dkim_socio_political_implications/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, cell phone portability was introduced in the United States which caused a major shift in the market. The same thing happened this past year in Israel, following a major battle involving the cell carriers, consumer groups and the Israeli parliament (The Knesset). What if the same happened with email addresses? Ridiculous, you say? May be so, but there is chatter here in Israel to create a law which forces the local service providers hands to do just that. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88661_email_portability_dkim_socio_political_implications/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-06T18:11:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>law</category><category>policy_regulation</category>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Internet Companies in Negotiations for Agreement on Code of Conduct in China</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/88664_internet_companies_code_of_conduct_china/</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/88664_internet_companies_code_of_conduct_china/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, in negotiations with other Internet companies and human rights organizations, have reached an agreement on a voluntary code of conduct for activities in China and other countries that censor the Internet. The participants are reviewing the agreement for final approval. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88664_internet_companies_code_of_conduct_china/">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-08-06T06:53:00-08:00</dc:date>
			<category>internet</category><category>censorship</category><category>internet_governance</category><category>web</category>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>