<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Daniel J. Weitzner &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Daniel J. Weitzner on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2008-07-03T20:51:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Google, Viacom, Privacy and Copyright Meet the Social Web (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/87390_google_viacom_privacy_copyright</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/87390_google_viacom_privacy_copyright</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In all the recent uproar (New York Times, "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/04/technology/04youtube.html">Google Told to Turn Over User Data of YouTube</a>," Michael Helft, 4 July 2008) about the fact that Google has been forced to turn over a large pile of personally-identifiable information to Viacom as part of a copyright dispute (<a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/viacom_youtube.PDF">Opinion</a>), there is a really interesting angle pointed out by Dan Brickley (co-creator of FOAF and general Semantic Web troublemaker)... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/87390_google_viacom_privacy_copyright">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-07-03T20:51:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Important New Jersey Supreme Court Decision in Internet Privacy (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/842310_new_jersey_court_internet_privacy</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/842310_new_jersey_court_internet_privacy</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey Supreme Court has issued an important decision on Internet users' right to privacy. The case involves a dispute about whether an ISP violated a user's privacy rights by turning over subscriber information (name, address, billing details) associated with a particular IP address. It ends up that the subpoena served on the ISP was invalid for a variety of reasons. As the user had a 'reasonable expectation of privacy' in her Internet activities and identifying information, and because the subpoena served on the ISP was invalid, the New Jersey court determined that the ISP should not have turned over the personal data... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/842310_new_jersey_court_internet_privacy">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-23T10:27:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Governments and Governance (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/governments_and_governance</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/governments_and_governance</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A United Nations task force recently held a two-day workshop on the question of who governs the Internet. U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan challenged those of us present to ensure that the Internet and the World Wide Web support "the cause of human development." 
Following in the long-standing tradition of skepticism about governments in the Internet community, some in the technical community and the Internet's chattering classes view the concerns expressed by the United Nations and countries such as Brazil, India and others, as a threat to the operation of the Internet itself. [i]This article was originally published at CNET News.Com on April 6, 2004.[/i] <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/governments_and_governance">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2004-04-09T12:06:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>