<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Konstantinos Komaitis &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Konstantinos Komaitis on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2006-10-16T11:03:01-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> JPA Agreement: Will it Change the Problems With the UDRP? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/jpa_agreement_problems_with_udrp</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/jpa_agreement_problems_with_udrp</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It was rather interesting to read this new agreement between the USDoC and ICANN talking about the mechanisms, methods and procedures necessary to effect the transition of Internet domain name and addressing system (DNS) to the private sector. What was more interesting though was to read in this very agreement the following: "...the Department continues to support the work of ICANN as the coordinator for the technical functions related to the management of the Internet DNS". OK, let's be honest! Technical? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/jpa_agreement_problems_with_udrp">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-10-16T11:03:01-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Why We Need to Find Solutions on Internet Governance As Soon As Possible (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/solution_internet_governance_as_soon_as_possible</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/solution_internet_governance_as_soon_as_possible</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Internet Governance is the buzzword, especially over the past couple of years, with debates and negotiations taking place almost with the same intensity and pathos of delicate issues, such as terrorism. But Internet Governance is a delicate issue. At the beginning, there was the web that made everything better... Life was good and exciting. That was Internet 1.0. But consider Internet 2.0, currently in development. No longer an egalitarian utopia, it has become much like the rest of our society -- divided by class, geography, culture, religion and politics. And its growing fragmentation threatens us all -- because we will be asked to take sides. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/solution_internet_governance_as_soon_as_possible">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-08-29T06:12:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>