<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Michael Geist &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Michael Geist on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2012, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2010-11-04T08:10:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Facing Up to the Generational Privacy Divide (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20101104_facing_up_to_the_generational_privacy_divide</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20101104_facing_up_to_the_generational_privacy_divide</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Last week hundreds of privacy regulators, corporate officers, and activists gathered in Jerusalem, Israel for the annual Data Protection and Privacy Commissioner Conference. ... Many acknowledged that longstanding privacy norms are being increasingly challenged by the massive popularity of social networks that encourage users to share information that in a previous generation would have never been made publicly available for all the world to see. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20101104_facing_up_to_the_generational_privacy_divide">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2010-11-04T08:10:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> U.S. Uses Domain Names As New Way to Regulate the Net (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100929_us_uses_domain_names_as_new_way_to_regulate_the_net</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100929_us_uses_domain_names_as_new_way_to_regulate_the_net</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Governments have long sought ways to regulate Internet activity, whether for the purposes of taxation, content regulation, or the application of national laws. Effective regulatory measures have often proven elusive, however, since, unlike the Internet, national laws typically end at the border. Earlier this month, the United States began to move aggressively toward a new way of confronting the Internet's jurisdictional limitations - the domain name system. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100929_us_uses_domain_names_as_new_way_to_regulate_the_net">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2010-09-29T10:28:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> European ACTA Document Leaks With New Details on Mexico Talks and Future Meetings (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/european_acta_document_leak_new_details_on_mexico_talks</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/european_acta_document_leak_new_details_on_mexico_talks</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A brief report from the European Commission authored by Pedro Velasco Martins (an EU negotiator) on the most recent round of ACTA negotiations in Guadalajara, Mexico has leaked, providing new information on the substance of the talks, how countries are addressing the transparency concerns, and plans for future negotiations. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/european_acta_document_leak_new_details_on_mexico_talks">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2010-02-17T12:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> New Zealand Releases Revamped Three Strikes Proposal (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091216_new_zealand_releases_revamped_three_strikes_proposal</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091216_new_zealand_releases_revamped_three_strikes_proposal</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The New Zealand government has released a revamped three strikes proposal that incorporates full court hearings and the possibility of financial penalties. A prior proposal, which would have resulted in subscriber access being terminated without court oversight, was dropped earlier this year following public protest. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091216_new_zealand_releases_revamped_three_strikes_proposal">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-12-16T11:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Opposition Mounts in Europe to Three-Strikes Proposals (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091124_opposition_mounts_in_europe_to_three_strikes_proposals</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091124_opposition_mounts_in_europe_to_three_strikes_proposals</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Multiple reports today indicate that opposition is growing in Europe to plans for three-strikes policies that could lead to the termination of Internet access for some subscribers. In the U.K., protests are mounting over those plans in the recently introduced Digital Economy Bill. The BBC reports that thousands of people have signed a petition urging the government to reconsider its approach, while the Open Rights Group says it has seen a big spike in membership. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091124_opposition_mounts_in_europe_to_three_strikes_proposals">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-11-24T12:12:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Canadian Marketing Association Attacks Anti-Spam Bill (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091016_canadian_marketing_association_attacks_anti_spam_bill</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091016_canadian_marketing_association_attacks_anti_spam_bill</link>
			<description><![CDATA[With the final Industry Committee review of C-27, Canada's anti-spam legislation, set for Monday afternoon, lobby groups have been increasing the pressure all week in an effort to water down many of the bill's key protections. Yesterday, the Canadian Marketing Association chimed in with an emergency bulletin to its members calling on them to lobby for changes to the bill. While the CMA was very supportive of the bill when it appeared before the committee in June, it now wants to kill the core protection in C-27 - a requirement for express opt-in consent. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20091016_canadian_marketing_association_attacks_anti_spam_bill">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-10-16T11:22:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Privacy Commissioner Finds Facebook Violating Canadian Privacy Law (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090716_facebook_violating_canadian_privacy_law</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090716_facebook_violating_canadian_privacy_law</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada has released its long-awaited finding in the complaint against Facebook on a variety of privacy grounds. The complaint was launched by CIPPIC in May 2008 (note that I am an advisor to CIPPIC but had no involvement in this complaint). The case marks an important step in assessing how Canadian privacy law addresses social media with the Commissioner identifying some significant concerns. Moreover, as the case potentially heads to court, it will be closely watched to see whether the findings can be enforced against a global social media power like Facebook. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090716_facebook_violating_canadian_privacy_law">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-07-16T09:01:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> When Did CIRA Become the Commercial Internet Registration Authority? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090324_when_did_cira_become_commercial_internet_registration_authority</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090324_when_did_cira_become_commercial_internet_registration_authority</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nearly ten years ago, the Government of Canada wrote a letter to the chair of the Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA) that set out the framework for the management of the dot-ca domain. The government articulated a vision of the dot-ca domain as a “key public resource” and called on CIRA to act in an open and transparent manner. CIRA has long sought to live up to those standards, but in recent months the organization has shown an unmistakable shift toward prioritizing commercial gain over the public interest along with a troubling move toward secret decision making... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090324_when_did_cira_become_commercial_internet_registration_authority">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-03-24T10:46:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> WIPO's Misleading Release (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090317_wipo_misleading_release_domain_disputes</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090317_wipo_misleading_release_domain_disputes</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The World Intellectual Property Organization put out a <a href="http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2009/article_0005.html">release</a> yesterday trumpeting an eight percent increase in domain name disputes handled by WIPO. In 2008 there were 2329 complaints filed with WIPO, the most ever. WIPO uses the increase to raise questions about the possible increase in the number of available generic top-level domains... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090317_wipo_misleading_release_domain_disputes">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-03-17T15:59:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Lawless Canada Emerging as a Spam Haven (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081203_lawless_canada_spam_haven</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081203_lawless_canada_spam_haven</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The recent Facebook case has placed the spotlight on Canada's ongoing failure to address its spam problem by introducing long overdue anti-spam legislation. The fact that organizations are forced to use U.S. courts and laws to deal with Canadian spammers points to an inconvenient truth &ndash; Canadian anti-spam laws are woefully inadequate and we are rapidly emerging as a haven for spammers eager exploit the weak legal framework. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081203_lawless_canada_spam_haven">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-12-03T08:09:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> CRTC Denies CAIP Application on Throttling, But Sets Net Neutrality Hearing (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081120_crtc_denies_throttling_net_neutrality</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081120_crtc_denies_throttling_net_neutrality</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This morning, the CRTC issued its much-anticipated ruling in the CAIP v. Bell case, the first major case to test the legality of Internet throttling. The Commission denied CAIP's application, ruling that Bell treated all of its customers (retail and wholesale) in the same throttled manner. This points to the challenge in this case -- it was not about discriminatory network practices per se, but rather about wholesale shaping in a specific context. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20081120_crtc_denies_throttling_net_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-11-20T13:26:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Coming to Grips with an Internet that Never Forgets (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_that_never_forgets</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_that_never_forgets</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My weekly technology law column discusses the implications of an Internet that never forgets. I note that the most significant Internet effect during the current election campaign in Canada has not been any particular online video, website or Facebook group. Instead, it has been the resignation of eight Canadian candidates based on embarrassing or controversial information unearthed online. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_that_never_forgets">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-09-30T14:26:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> CIRA Creates Backdoor WHOIS Exceptions for Police and IP Owners (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/86103_cira_backdoor_whois_police</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/86103_cira_backdoor_whois_police</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year, I wrote <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2897/135/">glowingly</a> about the new CIRA whois policy, which took effect today and which I described as striking the right balance between access and privacy. The policy was to have provided new privacy protection to individual registrants -- hundreds of thousands of Canadians -- by removing the public disclosure of their personal contact information... Apparently I spoke too soon. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/86103_cira_backdoor_whois_police">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-06-10T14:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> New CIRA Whois Policy Strikes Balance Between Privacy and Access (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My weekly technology law column focuses this week on the new <a href="http://www.cira.ca/en/Whois/whois_intro.html">CIRA whois policy</a> that is scheduled to take effect on June 10, 2008. The whois issue has attracted little public attention, yet it has been the subject of heated debate within the domain name community for many years. It revolves around the whois database, a publicly accessible, searchable list of domain name registrant information (as in "who is" the registrant of a particular domain name). <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/85210_cira_whois_policy_privacy_access">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-05-02T09:54:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Does Bell Really Have a P2P Bandwidth Problem? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/841710_bell_p2p_bandwidth_problem</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/841710_bell_p2p_bandwidth_problem</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bell filed its response to the Canadian Association Of Internet Providers (CAIP) submission to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) on its throttling practices yesterday, unsurprisingly arguing that its actions are justified and that there is no need to deal with the issue on an emergency basis. Several points stand out from the submission including its non-response to the privacy concerns with deep-packet inspection... and its inference that P2P usage could be deemed using a connection as a "server" and therefore outside the boundaries of "fair and proportionate use" under typical ISP terms of use. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/841710_bell_p2p_bandwidth_problem">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2008-04-17T10:17:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
