<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Mark Foster &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Mark Foster on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2004-01-14T10:56:36-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> TLD Operators: Cleaning Up Lame Delegations (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/tld_operators_cleaning_up_lame_delegations</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/tld_operators_cleaning_up_lame_delegations</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ICANN's Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SECSAC) recently released some recommendations regarding the DNS infrastructure, specifying among other things, that sub-zone delegation be kept up-to-date. ...The SECSAC report doesn't mention, but I believe is trying to address, is the alarming fact that nearly 10% of the name servers listed in the root zone are lame, either they aren't authoritative for the zones they are supposed to be, or they are unreachable much of the time.
 <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/tld_operators_cleaning_up_lame_delegations">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2004-01-14T10:56:36-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>