<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Paul Stahura &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Paul Stahura on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2013, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2012-05-03T17:56:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Donuts and TAS: What We Really Care About (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20120503_donuts_and_tas_what_we_really_care_about</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20120503_donuts_and_tas_what_we_really_care_about</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Like everyone else applying for new gTLDs, the Donuts team thought it would now be poring over a list of applicant names and strings, nodding heads and at times raising eyebrows. The timing didn't work out that way. ICANN did the right thing by closing TAS temporarily in order to understand what it was dealing with. It's easy enough for applicants to get rattled by what they think may have happened... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20120503_donuts_and_tas_what_we_really_care_about">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2012-05-03T17:56:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> TLD Rights Protection Mechanisms (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/tld_rights_protection_mechanisms</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/tld_rights_protection_mechanisms</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Potential trademark Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPM) at the 2nd level can be divided into three main areas -- each defined by their time relative to Top-Level Domain (TLD) launch... Of these, we believe the third, "After Launch," is the most fruitful path to explore. We believe it offers the most potential to protect the rights of trademark holders, the best balance between TM rights and the legitimate rights of others who may want to register names , and the most benefit to the trademark community at the lowest cost to them... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/tld_rights_protection_mechanisms">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-04-08T17:12:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Analysis of Domain Names Registered Across Multiple Existing TLDs and Implications for New gTLDs (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090202_analysis_domain_names_registered_new_gtlds</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090202_analysis_domain_names_registered_new_gtlds</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The following is an analysis based on the hypothesis that trademark holders are not, in general, registering their trademarks as domain names across the existing top-level domain namespace. To determine if the hypothesis is true, we examine domain names registered in the popular generic top-level domains ("gTLDs" such as .com, .net and .info), also using other publicly available information such as the USPTO database of trademarks, the English dictionary, DNS entries, UDRP records and whois records. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090202_analysis_domain_names_registered_new_gtlds">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-02-02T09:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>