<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Karl Auerbach &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Karl Auerbach on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2008, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2007-07-09T21:51:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> Google Buys VeriSign (not really) (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_buys_verisign_not</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_buys_verisign_not</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No that's not really happening, Google is not buying VeriSign. But given Google's ravenous appetite for data, it might find VeriSign quite attractive. VeriSign has both root domain name servers and servers for the .com and .net top level domains (TLDs). VeriSign could data mine the queries coming into those servers and produce a very valuable real-time stream of what users on the net are doing... Google just <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070709/ap_on_bi_ge/google_postini_4">bought</a> Postini -- and one would have to be fairly naive to believe that Google does not intend to dredge through all... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/google_buys_verisign_not">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-07-09T21:51:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Putting Some Circuit Breakers Into DNS to Protect The Net (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/circuit_breakers_dns_protect</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/circuit_breakers_dns_protect</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of bad, but smart, people out there on the net. They are quick to find and capitalize on vulnerabilities, particularly those vulnerabilities in mass market software. These bad folks are quite creative when it comes to making it hard to locate and shutdown the computers involved. For example, a virus that takes over a victim's computer might communicate with its control point, or send its captured/stolen information, by looking up a domain name. Normally domain names are somewhat static - the addresses they map to don't change very frequently - typically changes occur over periods measured in months or longer. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/circuit_breakers_dns_protect">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-04-03T08:41:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Are We Slowly Losing Control of the Internet? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/losing_control_of_the_internet</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/losing_control_of_the_internet</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have long been intrigued by the question of how do we turn the internet into a lifeline grade infrastructure... My hope that this will occur soon or even within decades is diminishing. Most of us observe, almost daily, how even well established infrastructures tend to crumble when stressed, even slightly... I was at the O'Reilly Etel conference last week. The content was impressive and the people there were frequently the primary actors in the creation and deployment of VOIP. However, not once during the three days did I hear a serious discussion by a speaker or in the hallways about how this evolving system would be managed, monitored, diagnosed, or repaired. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/losing_control_of_the_internet">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-03-09T12:47:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Internet Zombies (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_zombies</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_zombies</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Today on <a href="http://archives.listbox.com/247/">Dave Farber's IP list</a>, someone revived the ancient argument that ICANN imposes limits on the number of top level domains (TLDs) because to have more than a few will cause DNS to wobble and cause the internet to collapse. Although long discredited, that argument hangs around like a zombie. ICANN has never been able to adduce a shred of proof that there is anything to support that assertion... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_zombies">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2007-01-08T09:54:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Questioning "Net Neutrality" (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/questioning_net_neutrality</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/questioning_net_neutrality</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm kinda foxed by the some of the discussion going on about "Net Neutrality". The internet was designed from the outset <u><em>not</em></u> to be content neutral. Even before there was an IP protocol there were precedence flags in the NCP packet headers. And the IP (the <em>Internet Protocol</em>) has always had 8 bits that are there for the sole purpose of marking the precedence and type-of-service of each packet. It has been well known since the 1970's that certain classes of traffic -- particularly voice (and yes, there was voice on the internet even during the 1970's) -- need special handling... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/questioning_net_neutrality">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2006-02-10T13:04:53-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Europe is to the US Controlled GPS as Europe is to the US Controlled DNS Root? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/gps_as_europe_is_to_us_controlled_dns_root</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/gps_as_europe_is_to_us_controlled_dns_root</link>
			<description><![CDATA[An Analogy: Europe is to the US controlled GPS as Europe is to the US controlled DNS root? That's not a very good title is it? But it does express the point I want to make. This week the European Union launched the first satellite of its own global positioning system, Galileo. One has to wonder why the Europeans feel they need to do this. Isn't the GPS system run by the United States a perfectly good system? <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/gps_as_europe_is_to_us_controlled_dns_root">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-12-29T10:45:46-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> ICANN Does Something Technical! (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_does_something_technical</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_does_something_technical</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've often said that ICANN regulates the business of buying and selling of domain names and that ICANN's claim that it coordinates technical matters to preserve the stability of DNS is a fantasy. Well I am proven wrong. ICANN has done something technical. ICANN has issued <a href="http://www.icann.org/general/idn-guidelines-07nov05.pdf">Guidelines for the Implementation of Internationalized Domain Names, Draft Version 2</a> [PDF] (pending approval by the ICANN board.) It's only four pages long, but those few pages contain a lot of significant material. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_does_something_technical">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-11-08T20:04:44-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Forgotten Principles of Internet Governance (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/forgotten_principles_of_internet_governance</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/forgotten_principles_of_internet_governance</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Suddenly internet governance has become a hot topic. Words and phrases fly back and forth but minds rarely meet. We do not have discussion, we have chaos. We are not moving forwards towards a resolution. It's time to step back and review some basic principles. 1. Principle: The internet is here to serve the needs of people (and organizations of people); people are not here to serve the internet. Corollary: If internet technology does not meet the needs of users and organizations than it is technology that should be the first to flex and change. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/forgotten_principles_of_internet_governance">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-10-22T09:45:10-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> About Those Root Servers (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/about_those_root_servers</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/about_those_root_servers</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting note on the ITU Strategy and Policy Unit Newslog about [url=http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/newslog/Root+Servers+Anycast+DNSSEC+WGIG+And+WSIS.aspx]Root Servers, Anycast, DNSSEC, WGIG and WSIS[/url] about a presentation to ICANN's GAC. (The GAC website appears to be offline or inaccessible today.) The interesting sentence is this: Lack of formal relationship with root server operators is a public policy issue relevant to Internet governance. It is stated that this is "wrong" and "not a way to solve the issues about who edits the [root] zone file." Let's look at that lack of a formal relationship... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/about_those_root_servers">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-08-01T12:33:01-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> The Power of Google (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_power_of_google</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_power_of_google</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The other night I was chatting with my wife about things and I mentioned a TV show that I saw back in the 1980's about a home-brew nuclear device in which the bomb-squad person who cuts the cliche red or green wire makes the wrong choice. So I went to Google to find the movie. I had a hard time finding it. (I eventually did - it was the 1983 show Special Bulletin.) But along the way I more than once wondered whether my memory was playing games on me. The meta-thought that came about was this... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_power_of_google">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-07-26T14:14:58-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> An Infrastructure TLD: Avoiding the Side Effects of Today's .Net (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/an_infrastructure_tld_avoiding_the_side_effects_of_todays_net</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/an_infrastructure_tld_avoiding_the_side_effects_of_todays_net</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've mentioned before that [url=http://www.cavebear.com/cbblog-archives/000138.html]there is something special about the .net top level domain[/url] - in particular [i].net[/i] is the place where the legacy root DNS servers and most of the TLD servers are to be found. Thus, if [i].net[/i] were to wobble there is more than a strong chance that the DNS root and other TLDs would also begin to wobble. This kind of cross-dependency is something that A) is a risk to overall internet stability and B) is something that ICANN seems utterly unable to perceive. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/an_infrastructure_tld_avoiding_the_side_effects_of_todays_net">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-06-01T10:38:29-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Protecting the Internet: Certified Attachments and Reverse Firewalls? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/protecting_the_internet_certified_attachments_and_reverse_firewalls</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/protecting_the_internet_certified_attachments_and_reverse_firewalls</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In many respects the internet is going to hell in a hand basket. Spam, phishing, DNS poisoning, DDoS attacks, viruses, worms, and the like make the net a sick place. It is bad enough that bad folks are doing this. But it is worse that just about every user computer on the net offers a nice fertile place for such ill behavior to be secretly planted and operated as a zombie under the control of a distant and unknown zombie farmer. ...Some of us are coming to the converse point of view that the net is being endangered by the masses of ill-protected machines operated by users. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/protecting_the_internet_certified_attachments_and_reverse_firewalls">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-03-16T13:50:24-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> The .net Top Level Domain and Cross-Coupled Failures (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_net_top_level_domain_and_cross_coupled_failures</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_net_top_level_domain_and_cross_coupled_failures</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The .net Top Level Domain (TLD) contains the names of the main group of DNS root servers as well as the names of the servers for several other large TLDs, such as .com, .org, .arpa and .mil. Most of the focus about the .net redelegation has concerned the quality of the registration systems. But that is a minor matter next to the quality of the name server operation.  <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/the_net_top_level_domain_and_cross_coupled_failures">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2005-01-21T12:00:23-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Are We Attending the Right ICANN Meeting? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/are_we_attending_the_right_icann_meeting</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/are_we_attending_the_right_icann_meeting</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have no idea who wrote that wonderful piece, Time for Reformation of the Internet, posted by Susan Crawford. (It wasn't me - I never use the word "netizen".) Elliot Noss of Tucows wrote a partial rebuttal, I must be attending the wrong ICANN meetings. Elliot's company, Tucows, has been a leader in registrar innovation and competition. And Tucows has constantly been among the most imaginative, progressive, responsible, and socially engaged companies engaged in these debates. ...But the points made by Time for Reformation of the Internet go far beyond registries and registrars. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/are_we_attending_the_right_icann_meeting">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2004-12-06T09:12:31-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> An Open Letter to NTIA, ICANN, and IANA (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/an_open_letter_to_ntia_icann_and_iana</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/an_open_letter_to_ntia_icann_and_iana</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am writing this note in order to express my concern about an impending change in the root of the Domain Name System (DNS) and two of the largest Top Level Domains (TLDs). I am concerned that there is a risk of disruption to the net that has not been adequately evaluated and I am concerned that this change is being deployed without adequate monitoring or safeguards. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/an_open_letter_to_ntia_icann_and_iana">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2004-10-10T17:00:58-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>