<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Adrian Kinderis &#45; CircleID</title>
		<link>http://www.circleid.com/</link>
		<description>Postings from Adrian Kinderis on CircleID</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2012, unless where otherwise noted.</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2011-10-18T14:47:00-08:00</dc:date>
		

		
		<item>
			<title> New TLD Applicants: Read This Before Selecting a Registry Provider (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/new_tld_applicants_read_this_before_selecting_a_registry_provider</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/new_tld_applicants_read_this_before_selecting_a_registry_provider</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As each day passes, I spend more time immersing myself with prospective clients who are weighing up our offering over those of alternative providers. The more I become entrenched in this competitive process, the more it becomes increasingly clear that many of the competing RSPs pitching their wares to hopeful applicants are misleading them by hiding critically important information in fine print disclaimers or feeding them rubbish in order to whittle down the competition. Competition is a great thing; it just needs to be on the same playing field. Make sure you are comparing apples with apples. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/new_tld_applicants_read_this_before_selecting_a_registry_provider">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-10-18T14:47:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Who is Wagging Who? Same Dog, New Tale. (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110504_who_is_wagging_who_same_dog_new_tale</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110504_who_is_wagging_who_same_dog_new_tale</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Today, my company AusRegistry International signed an open letter to the United States House Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet as a show of support for ICANN and its new Top-Level Domain program. I'm disappointed by the nature of the oversight hearing the Subcommittee has called and I believe it will only be a distraction. Let's not kid ourselves; the reason for this hearing is to beat up ICANN over the new TLD program. I think this is unfair and unjustified... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110504_who_is_wagging_who_same_dog_new_tale">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2011-05-04T07:34:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> Another Big Step Forward for New TLDs (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20101210_another_big_step_forward_for_new_tlds</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20101210_another_big_step_forward_for_new_tlds</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So after the initial reaction and "over-reaction" by some folks in the audience, I have been thinking about the implications of the ICANN resolution on new gTLDs at its Board meeting in Cartagena, Colombia. In short, the resolution and subsequent comments by the chair, Peter Dengate-Thrush have shown that there is positive momentum with respect to the program overall. "We have reached a turning point in the new gTLD program" he said. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20101210_another_big_step_forward_for_new_tlds">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2010-12-10T18:29:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> ICANN May Not Be Perfect, But It Is Working (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_may_not_be_perfect_but_it_is_working</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_may_not_be_perfect_but_it_is_working</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Though I have been critical of some of ICANN's shortcomings, I remain a strong supporter of ICANN's role as a private sector-led, multi-stakeholder global regulator for the Internet's core addressing systems. My recent blog post about my concerns with the communications processes relating to the addition of the first Arabic script IDN ccTLDs has been quoted in an ITU Staff Paper prepared for the ITU Council Working Group on the World Summit on the Information Society, to be held in Geneva tomorrow. This document seems to suggest... <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_may_not_be_perfect_but_it_is_working">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2010-06-13T08:50:01-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> By the way... Your IDN is Live. (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/by_the_way_your_idn_is_live</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/by_the_way_your_idn_is_live</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just when you think ICANN has got it right, it shoots itself in the foot as only ICANN can. Unfortunately it seems this is yet another case of one step forward and two steps back. While we should be celebrating the fact that Internationalised Domain Names (IDN's) have finally been entered into the Root Zone, we are instead left shaking our heads at the seemingly nonexistent process lines nor communication lines between ICANN and its technical off-shoot IANA. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/by_the_way_your_idn_is_live">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2010-05-07T07:18:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title> gTLDs: Why Are Your Overarching Issues Not Relevant In IDN ccTLDs? (Featured Blog)</title>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtlds_why_are_your_overarching_issues_not_relevant_in_idn_cctlds</guid>
			<link>http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtlds_why_are_your_overarching_issues_not_relevant_in_idn_cctlds</link>
			<description><![CDATA["If I would have a voting right, I would vote like this" said Janis Karklins, chair of the Government Advisory Committee (GAC) as he empathically raised two arms in the air. He was showing his, and the GAC's, overwhelming support for the ICANN Board unanimously (barring one abstention) passing the resolution that ratified the IDN ccTLD Fast Track process, propelling it toward an imminent release. A standing ovation was given from a grateful and exuberant audience and everyone seemed pleased with this momentous decision. <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/gtlds_why_are_your_overarching_issues_not_relevant_in_idn_cctlds">More...</a>]]></description>
			<dc:date>2009-11-25T00:28:00-08:00</dc:date>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
